沃尔泽军事干预理论的自助测验

Miguel Paradela López
{"title":"沃尔泽军事干预理论的自助测验","authors":"Miguel Paradela López","doi":"10.17230/CO-HERENCIA.16.30.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the importance of Michael Walzer’s self-help test and discusses its importance as a link between a community’s internal conflict and foreign military intervention. After a brief introduction to self-determination theory in Walzer’s philosophical thought –describing self-determination and non-intervention principles within the presumption of state legitimacy–, the paper examines the concept of self-help. Also, it addresses the particular features of this mechanism, examining the two levels of this test as well as the consequences of passing both. Then, the study discusses the importance of military intervention –either counter-intervention or intervention in contexts of secession – as a guarantor of self-determination in the international realm. Finally, the paper challenges the philosophical connection established by Walzer between military victory and national representativeness through the study of the Syrian Civil War. The article concludes that the self-help test is a controversial yet interesting proposal combining the respect for self-determination commitment with military intervention in the protection of international stability","PeriodicalId":142373,"journal":{"name":"Mundos distópicos en la literatura","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-help Test on Michael Walzer’s military intervention theory\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Paradela López\",\"doi\":\"10.17230/CO-HERENCIA.16.30.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the importance of Michael Walzer’s self-help test and discusses its importance as a link between a community’s internal conflict and foreign military intervention. After a brief introduction to self-determination theory in Walzer’s philosophical thought –describing self-determination and non-intervention principles within the presumption of state legitimacy–, the paper examines the concept of self-help. Also, it addresses the particular features of this mechanism, examining the two levels of this test as well as the consequences of passing both. Then, the study discusses the importance of military intervention –either counter-intervention or intervention in contexts of secession – as a guarantor of self-determination in the international realm. Finally, the paper challenges the philosophical connection established by Walzer between military victory and national representativeness through the study of the Syrian Civil War. The article concludes that the self-help test is a controversial yet interesting proposal combining the respect for self-determination commitment with military intervention in the protection of international stability\",\"PeriodicalId\":142373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mundos distópicos en la literatura\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mundos distópicos en la literatura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17230/CO-HERENCIA.16.30.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mundos distópicos en la literatura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17230/CO-HERENCIA.16.30.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文分析了迈克尔·沃尔泽的自助测试的重要性,并讨论了它作为一个社区内部冲突和外国军事干预之间的纽带的重要性。在简要介绍了沃尔泽哲学思想中的自决理论——在假定国家合法性的前提下描述自决和不干涉原则——之后,本文考察了自助的概念。此外,本文还讨论了该机制的特定特性,检查了该测试的两个级别以及通过这两个级别的结果。然后,该研究讨论了军事干预的重要性-无论是反干预还是在分裂背景下的干预-作为国际领域自决的保证。最后,本文通过对叙利亚内战的研究,对沃尔泽在军事胜利与民族代表性之间建立的哲学联系提出了挑战。文章的结论是,自助测试是一个有争议但有趣的建议,将尊重自决承诺与保护国际稳定的军事干预结合起来
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-help Test on Michael Walzer’s military intervention theory
This paper analyzes the importance of Michael Walzer’s self-help test and discusses its importance as a link between a community’s internal conflict and foreign military intervention. After a brief introduction to self-determination theory in Walzer’s philosophical thought –describing self-determination and non-intervention principles within the presumption of state legitimacy–, the paper examines the concept of self-help. Also, it addresses the particular features of this mechanism, examining the two levels of this test as well as the consequences of passing both. Then, the study discusses the importance of military intervention –either counter-intervention or intervention in contexts of secession – as a guarantor of self-determination in the international realm. Finally, the paper challenges the philosophical connection established by Walzer between military victory and national representativeness through the study of the Syrian Civil War. The article concludes that the self-help test is a controversial yet interesting proposal combining the respect for self-determination commitment with military intervention in the protection of international stability
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信