实时三维超声心动图定量左心室容积:多中心磁共振成像验证研究

V. Mor-Avi, C. Jenkins, H. Kühl, H. Nesser, T. Marwick, A. Franke, C. Ebner, B. Freed, R. Steringer‐Mascherbauer, H. Pollard, L. Weinert, J. Niel, L. Sugeng, R. Lang
{"title":"实时三维超声心动图定量左心室容积:多中心磁共振成像验证研究","authors":"V. Mor-Avi, C. Jenkins, H. Kühl, H. Nesser, T. Marwick, A. Franke, C. Ebner, B. Freed, R. Steringer‐Mascherbauer, H. Pollard, L. Weinert, J. Niel, L. Sugeng, R. Lang","doi":"10.1109/CIC.2008.4748968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained from RT3DE datasets are underestimated compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We sought to study the accuracy and reproducibility of this technique in a multicenter setting, the inter-institutional differences in these variables in relationship with investigatorspsila experience, and the potential sources of underestimation. 92 patients underwent CMR and RT3DE imaging at 4 different institutions. End-systolic and end-diastolic LV volumes correlated highly with CMR values (EDV: r=0.91; ESV: r=0.93), but were 29 and 26% lower. This finding was consistent across participating institutions, with the magnitude of bias being related to experience. Exclusion of trabeculae and mitral valve plane from the CMR reference essentially eliminated the inter-modality bias. In conclusion, LV volumes are underestimated in most patients because RT3DE imaging cannot differentiate between the myocardium and trabeculae.","PeriodicalId":194782,"journal":{"name":"2008 Computers in Cardiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"284","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: Multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging\",\"authors\":\"V. Mor-Avi, C. Jenkins, H. Kühl, H. Nesser, T. Marwick, A. Franke, C. Ebner, B. Freed, R. Steringer‐Mascherbauer, H. Pollard, L. Weinert, J. Niel, L. Sugeng, R. Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIC.2008.4748968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained from RT3DE datasets are underestimated compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We sought to study the accuracy and reproducibility of this technique in a multicenter setting, the inter-institutional differences in these variables in relationship with investigatorspsila experience, and the potential sources of underestimation. 92 patients underwent CMR and RT3DE imaging at 4 different institutions. End-systolic and end-diastolic LV volumes correlated highly with CMR values (EDV: r=0.91; ESV: r=0.93), but were 29 and 26% lower. This finding was consistent across participating institutions, with the magnitude of bias being related to experience. Exclusion of trabeculae and mitral valve plane from the CMR reference essentially eliminated the inter-modality bias. In conclusion, LV volumes are underestimated in most patients because RT3DE imaging cannot differentiate between the myocardium and trabeculae.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Computers in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"284\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Computers in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2008.4748968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Computers in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2008.4748968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 284

摘要

与心脏磁共振(CMR)相比,RT3DE数据集获得的左心室(LV)体积被低估了。我们试图研究该技术在多中心环境下的准确性和可重复性,这些变量的机构间差异与研究者的经验之间的关系,以及低估的潜在来源。92例患者在4个不同的机构接受了CMR和RT3DE成像。收缩期末和舒张期末左室容积与CMR值高度相关(EDV: r=0.91;ESV: r=0.93),但分别降低了29%和26%。这一发现在参与研究的机构中是一致的,偏见的程度与经验有关。从CMR参考资料中排除小梁和二尖瓣平面基本上消除了模态间偏差。总之,由于RT3DE成像不能区分心肌和小梁,大多数患者的左室体积被低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: Multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging
Left ventricular (LV) volumes obtained from RT3DE datasets are underestimated compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We sought to study the accuracy and reproducibility of this technique in a multicenter setting, the inter-institutional differences in these variables in relationship with investigatorspsila experience, and the potential sources of underestimation. 92 patients underwent CMR and RT3DE imaging at 4 different institutions. End-systolic and end-diastolic LV volumes correlated highly with CMR values (EDV: r=0.91; ESV: r=0.93), but were 29 and 26% lower. This finding was consistent across participating institutions, with the magnitude of bias being related to experience. Exclusion of trabeculae and mitral valve plane from the CMR reference essentially eliminated the inter-modality bias. In conclusion, LV volumes are underestimated in most patients because RT3DE imaging cannot differentiate between the myocardium and trabeculae.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信