国际供应合同争议解决条款的实证研究

J. Coyle, C. R. Drahozal
{"title":"国际供应合同争议解决条款的实证研究","authors":"J. Coyle, C. R. Drahozal","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3206695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International transactions present unique legal risks. When a contract touches several different nations, a party may not know where it will be called upon to defend a lawsuit or, alternatively, which nation’s law will be applied to resolve that dispute. To mitigate these risks, parties will often write dispute resolution provisions into their contracts. Arbitration clauses and forum selection clauses help to reduce uncertainty relating to forum. Choice-of-law clauses help to reduce uncertainty as to governing law. Over the past few decades, such provisions have become commonplace in international contracting. And yet there exist vanishingly few empirical studies exploring the use of these provisions in international commercial agreements. \n \nThis Article aspires to help fill this gap. Drawing upon a hand-collected dataset of 157 international supply agreements, it describes the ways in which large corporations seek to mitigate their risk in international transactions via dispute resolution clauses. The Article first provides a thick descriptive account of choice-of-law clauses in these agreements to illustrate the myriad ways these clauses do (and do not) mitigate legal risk. It then undertakes the same project with respect to arbitration clauses and forum selection clauses, paying careful attention to the ways in which actual practice deviates from the model forms promulgated by arbitration groups, to show how these clauses mitigate forum risk. \n \nWhile the primary object of the Article is descriptive rather than normative — it seeks to describe the contents of agreements that have heretofore been largely ignored by legal scholars — it also discusses the normative implications of its descriptive account for three groups. First, legal scholars may draw upon this account to better understand how contract boilerplate evolves and changes over time. Second, judges called upon to interpret a contract may utilize this account to determine whether a phrase is typically included in clauses of a given type. Third, and finally, contract drafters may glean useful insights into how to craft dispute resolution provisions that maximize the reduction in uncertainty in international contracting.","PeriodicalId":439669,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Study of Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Supply Contracts\",\"authors\":\"J. Coyle, C. R. Drahozal\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3206695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International transactions present unique legal risks. When a contract touches several different nations, a party may not know where it will be called upon to defend a lawsuit or, alternatively, which nation’s law will be applied to resolve that dispute. To mitigate these risks, parties will often write dispute resolution provisions into their contracts. Arbitration clauses and forum selection clauses help to reduce uncertainty relating to forum. Choice-of-law clauses help to reduce uncertainty as to governing law. Over the past few decades, such provisions have become commonplace in international contracting. And yet there exist vanishingly few empirical studies exploring the use of these provisions in international commercial agreements. \\n \\nThis Article aspires to help fill this gap. Drawing upon a hand-collected dataset of 157 international supply agreements, it describes the ways in which large corporations seek to mitigate their risk in international transactions via dispute resolution clauses. The Article first provides a thick descriptive account of choice-of-law clauses in these agreements to illustrate the myriad ways these clauses do (and do not) mitigate legal risk. It then undertakes the same project with respect to arbitration clauses and forum selection clauses, paying careful attention to the ways in which actual practice deviates from the model forms promulgated by arbitration groups, to show how these clauses mitigate forum risk. \\n \\nWhile the primary object of the Article is descriptive rather than normative — it seeks to describe the contents of agreements that have heretofore been largely ignored by legal scholars — it also discusses the normative implications of its descriptive account for three groups. First, legal scholars may draw upon this account to better understand how contract boilerplate evolves and changes over time. Second, judges called upon to interpret a contract may utilize this account to determine whether a phrase is typically included in clauses of a given type. Third, and finally, contract drafters may glean useful insights into how to craft dispute resolution provisions that maximize the reduction in uncertainty in international contracting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3206695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3206695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

国际交易具有独特的法律风险。当一份合同涉及几个不同的国家时,一方可能不知道自己将被要求在哪里为诉讼辩护,或者,哪一个国家的法律将适用于解决该争议。为了减轻这些风险,双方通常会在合同中写入争议解决条款。仲裁条款和论坛选择条款有助于减少与论坛有关的不确定性。法律选择条款有助于减少适用法律的不确定性。在过去的几十年里,这样的条款在国际合同中已经司空见惯。然而,探索在国际商业协议中使用这些条款的实证研究却寥寥无几。本文旨在帮助填补这一空白。根据一份手工收集的157份国际供应协议数据集,报告描述了大公司如何通过争议解决条款降低其在国际交易中的风险。本文首先对这些协议中的法律选择条款进行了详尽的描述,以说明这些条款减轻(或不减轻)法律风险的无数方式。然后,本文对仲裁条款和仲裁地选择条款进行了同样的研究,仔细关注实际实践与仲裁团体颁布的示范形式的偏离,以展示这些条款如何降低仲裁地风险。虽然该条的主要目的是描述性的而不是规范性的- -它试图描述迄今为止在很大程度上被法律学者所忽视的协议的内容- -它也讨论了其描述性说明对三个群体的规范性影响。首先,法律学者可以利用这一解释来更好地理解合同模板是如何随着时间的推移而演变和变化的。其次,被要求解释合同的法官可以利用这种解释来确定一个短语是否典型地包括在特定类型的条款中。第三,也是最后一点,合同起草者可以收集有用的见解,了解如何起草争议解决条款,最大限度地减少国际合同中的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Study of Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Supply Contracts
International transactions present unique legal risks. When a contract touches several different nations, a party may not know where it will be called upon to defend a lawsuit or, alternatively, which nation’s law will be applied to resolve that dispute. To mitigate these risks, parties will often write dispute resolution provisions into their contracts. Arbitration clauses and forum selection clauses help to reduce uncertainty relating to forum. Choice-of-law clauses help to reduce uncertainty as to governing law. Over the past few decades, such provisions have become commonplace in international contracting. And yet there exist vanishingly few empirical studies exploring the use of these provisions in international commercial agreements. This Article aspires to help fill this gap. Drawing upon a hand-collected dataset of 157 international supply agreements, it describes the ways in which large corporations seek to mitigate their risk in international transactions via dispute resolution clauses. The Article first provides a thick descriptive account of choice-of-law clauses in these agreements to illustrate the myriad ways these clauses do (and do not) mitigate legal risk. It then undertakes the same project with respect to arbitration clauses and forum selection clauses, paying careful attention to the ways in which actual practice deviates from the model forms promulgated by arbitration groups, to show how these clauses mitigate forum risk. While the primary object of the Article is descriptive rather than normative — it seeks to describe the contents of agreements that have heretofore been largely ignored by legal scholars — it also discusses the normative implications of its descriptive account for three groups. First, legal scholars may draw upon this account to better understand how contract boilerplate evolves and changes over time. Second, judges called upon to interpret a contract may utilize this account to determine whether a phrase is typically included in clauses of a given type. Third, and finally, contract drafters may glean useful insights into how to craft dispute resolution provisions that maximize the reduction in uncertainty in international contracting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信