柏拉图宇宙的几何学

M. Sutton
{"title":"柏拉图宇宙的几何学","authors":"M. Sutton","doi":"10.46472/cc.0223.0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current understanding of astronomy attributes the earliest geometric models to the Greeks. Yet there remains substantial uncertainty about the Mesopotamian origins of the classical Greek constellations. It is here shown how clues famously given by Plato in his Timaeus provide the key to understanding the original geometric design framework. Having allocated the four elements (Water, Earth, Fire and Air) to regular polyhedra, Plato assigned a fifth figure to the cosmos, traditionally identified as the dodecahedron. Based on geometrical and philosophical arguments, it is here proposed that Plato also had in mind the orbicular elevated dodecahedron, consisting of 360 fundamental Platonic scalene triangles. In mapping it out as a convenient approximation to the celestial sphere, we discover that it offers a geometric framework for the Paths of Anu, Enlil and Ea of Mesopotamian astronomy, while explaining the enigma of why the constellations of the zodiac are not equally distributed along the ecliptic. Three rings with partial ten-way rotational symmetry are also identified that appear to have been used in the design framework. The conclusions emphasize Plato’s debt to earlier astronomers, while transforming our understanding of the constellations so familiar today.","PeriodicalId":152044,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Cosmos","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Geometry of Plato’s Cosmos\",\"authors\":\"M. Sutton\",\"doi\":\"10.46472/cc.0223.0209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current understanding of astronomy attributes the earliest geometric models to the Greeks. Yet there remains substantial uncertainty about the Mesopotamian origins of the classical Greek constellations. It is here shown how clues famously given by Plato in his Timaeus provide the key to understanding the original geometric design framework. Having allocated the four elements (Water, Earth, Fire and Air) to regular polyhedra, Plato assigned a fifth figure to the cosmos, traditionally identified as the dodecahedron. Based on geometrical and philosophical arguments, it is here proposed that Plato also had in mind the orbicular elevated dodecahedron, consisting of 360 fundamental Platonic scalene triangles. In mapping it out as a convenient approximation to the celestial sphere, we discover that it offers a geometric framework for the Paths of Anu, Enlil and Ea of Mesopotamian astronomy, while explaining the enigma of why the constellations of the zodiac are not equally distributed along the ecliptic. Three rings with partial ten-way rotational symmetry are also identified that appear to have been used in the design framework. The conclusions emphasize Plato’s debt to earlier astronomers, while transforming our understanding of the constellations so familiar today.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture and Cosmos\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture and Cosmos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.0223.0209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Cosmos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46472/cc.0223.0209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前对天文学的理解将最早的几何模型归于希腊人。然而,关于古希腊星座起源于美索不达米亚的说法仍然存在很大的不确定性。这里展示了柏拉图在他的《蒂迈奥》中给出的著名线索是如何为理解原始几何设计框架提供关键的。在把四种元素(水、土、火、气)分配给正多面体之后,柏拉图给宇宙分配了第五个图形,传统上被认为是十二面体。基于几何和哲学的论证,这里提出柏拉图也想到了由360个基本的柏拉图不等边三角形组成的高圆形十二面体。在把它作为一个方便的天体近似图绘制出来的过程中,我们发现它为美索不达米亚天文学的阿努、恩利尔和伊亚之路提供了一个几何框架,同时解释了黄道上的星座为什么不是沿黄道均匀分布的谜团。三个环与部分十向旋转对称也被确定,似乎已在设计框架中使用。结论强调了柏拉图对早期天文学家的贡献,同时改变了我们今天对星座的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Geometry of Plato’s Cosmos
Current understanding of astronomy attributes the earliest geometric models to the Greeks. Yet there remains substantial uncertainty about the Mesopotamian origins of the classical Greek constellations. It is here shown how clues famously given by Plato in his Timaeus provide the key to understanding the original geometric design framework. Having allocated the four elements (Water, Earth, Fire and Air) to regular polyhedra, Plato assigned a fifth figure to the cosmos, traditionally identified as the dodecahedron. Based on geometrical and philosophical arguments, it is here proposed that Plato also had in mind the orbicular elevated dodecahedron, consisting of 360 fundamental Platonic scalene triangles. In mapping it out as a convenient approximation to the celestial sphere, we discover that it offers a geometric framework for the Paths of Anu, Enlil and Ea of Mesopotamian astronomy, while explaining the enigma of why the constellations of the zodiac are not equally distributed along the ecliptic. Three rings with partial ten-way rotational symmetry are also identified that appear to have been used in the design framework. The conclusions emphasize Plato’s debt to earlier astronomers, while transforming our understanding of the constellations so familiar today.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信