专有软件、开源软件和自由软件的比较分析

Abhineet Anand, Anand Krishna, Rajeev Tiwari, Robin Sharma
{"title":"专有软件、开源软件和自由软件的比较分析","authors":"Abhineet Anand, Anand Krishna, Rajeev Tiwari, Robin Sharma","doi":"10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This analysis mainly focuses on the domain of prime importance of Software which are more prominent for our system. It requires more attention of ours to switch over in Open-Source rather to invest and compete with proprietary software. In this model, we have considered a seesaw model which balances open-source software and proprietary software by a balance beam of free software. We have taken in consideration two fields (i.e) competition and investment to compare the consumer's interest areas and to know about their choices in current scenario. On putting loads of consumers on one side we can also recorded that the beam balance (free software) moves automatically towards the adjacent software and enrich the given software, in both fields whether it is related to competition or in terms of consumer's investment. This model analysis on points of fully covered market and partly covered market, which shows the current trends of consumer's interest and their profit maximization policies.","PeriodicalId":303401,"journal":{"name":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis between Proprietary Software VS. Open-Source Software VS. Free Software\",\"authors\":\"Abhineet Anand, Anand Krishna, Rajeev Tiwari, Robin Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This analysis mainly focuses on the domain of prime importance of Software which are more prominent for our system. It requires more attention of ours to switch over in Open-Source rather to invest and compete with proprietary software. In this model, we have considered a seesaw model which balances open-source software and proprietary software by a balance beam of free software. We have taken in consideration two fields (i.e) competition and investment to compare the consumer's interest areas and to know about their choices in current scenario. On putting loads of consumers on one side we can also recorded that the beam balance (free software) moves automatically towards the adjacent software and enrich the given software, in both fields whether it is related to competition or in terms of consumer's investment. This model analysis on points of fully covered market and partly covered market, which shows the current trends of consumer's interest and their profit maximization policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":303401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文的分析主要集中在对我们的系统更为突出的最重要的软件领域。这需要我们更多的关注转向开源,而不是投资并与专有软件竞争。在这个模型中,我们考虑了一个跷跷板模型,它通过自由软件的平衡木来平衡开源软件和专有软件。我们考虑了两个领域(即竞争和投资)来比较消费者的兴趣领域,并了解他们在当前情况下的选择。在将大量消费者放在一边时,我们还可以记录到平衡木(自由软件)自动向相邻软件移动并丰富给定软件,无论是与竞争有关还是与消费者投资有关。该模型分析了全覆盖市场和部分覆盖市场的点,显示了消费者利益的当前趋势和他们的利润最大化政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis between Proprietary Software VS. Open-Source Software VS. Free Software
This analysis mainly focuses on the domain of prime importance of Software which are more prominent for our system. It requires more attention of ours to switch over in Open-Source rather to invest and compete with proprietary software. In this model, we have considered a seesaw model which balances open-source software and proprietary software by a balance beam of free software. We have taken in consideration two fields (i.e) competition and investment to compare the consumer's interest areas and to know about their choices in current scenario. On putting loads of consumers on one side we can also recorded that the beam balance (free software) moves automatically towards the adjacent software and enrich the given software, in both fields whether it is related to competition or in terms of consumer's investment. This model analysis on points of fully covered market and partly covered market, which shows the current trends of consumer's interest and their profit maximization policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信