无出口:查尔斯·切斯纳特和欧内斯特·盖恩斯的混血角色和种族二元

K. Byerman
{"title":"无出口:查尔斯·切斯纳特和欧内斯特·盖恩斯的混血角色和种族二元","authors":"K. Byerman","doi":"10.1353/SLI.2016.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Ernest J. Gaines has generally emphasized the importance of white writers rather than black ones in his career, he shares with Charles Chesnutt an interest in the role of mixed-race characters in narrative. Repeatedly in his brief fiction-writing career, Chesnutt engaged with both the passing tradition and the status of those who were marked as black though they clearly had white ancestry. Similarly, Gaines, in both novels and short stories, depicted the social and racial pressures on light-skinned characters.1 The focus of this essay will be on narratives of those who have been clearly labeled black regardless of ancestry. While Gaines shows little interest in stories of passing, he shares with Chesnutt a concern for Black Creoles and for those who choose or are compelled to identify as black. The texts I will be examining are Chesnutt's Paul Marchand, F. M. C. and \"The Wife of His Youth\" and Gainess Catherine Carmier and \"Bloodline.\" The two novels treat Creole characters and their status within multiracial and multiethnic societies, while the two stories focus on light-skinned men and their relationships to other blacks as well as whites. Each of these works in one way or another signifies on the tradition of the tragic mulatto/a. For example, there is no deceit or confusion on the part of the central characters about their racial category, as there is in Chesnutts House Behind the Cedars. Nor is there the angst of white and mulatto romance such as we see between Robert and Mary Agnes in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman. Instead, we find a free man of color who turns out to be white, a \"black\" man who has the arrogance and racial superiority of his white father, a family of Black Creoles who are the only members of the community who define themselves as different from blacks, and a light-skinned man who at the end of the story may or may not identify with his black past. Both authors, in effect, depict complex performances of race along the socially constructed boundary that constitutes the color line. Thus, each of them rejects straightforward ideas of essentialism, but does so in the context of his particular historical moment. For Chesnutt, this moment of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is the time of retrenchment in civil rights, white racial terrorism, and the development of a racial \"science\" that sought to give a biological, social, and anthropological basis for essentialist thinking and policies. Gaines's moment came at the high point of the civil right movement, with the emergence of black nationalism and a reversed claim of essentialism that asserted black moral superiority. Thus, it can be argued that each writer uses mixed-race characters to subvert fixed notions of race while acknowledging the power of such notions in shaping the lives of their characters. It is also worth noting that all four works involve some moral violation that extends beyond white supremacy (which both writers see as a fixed aspect of the societies they depict) and the violations of black women's bodies that produced the mixed-race characters that are their subjects. Thus, the texts create an implicit link between such figures and the moral failure that is the nation's racial ideology. In \"The Wife of His Youth,\" Chesnutt can be seen as critiquing if not satirizing the pretensions of northern, middle-class, light-skinned blacks. (2) It is worth noting that this is Chesnutt's own social category, so the story may be read as self-criticism. The central character, Mr. Ryder, has become the leader of the Blue Vein Society, so called because its members are assumed to be light enough to have visibly blue veins. While the group denies such an exclusionary requirement, Ryder himself, though slightly darker than others, establishes a standard: \"I have no race prejudice,\" he would say, \"but we people of mixed blood are ground between the upper and the nether millstone. Our fate lies between absorption by the white race and extinction in the black. …","PeriodicalId":390916,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Exit: Mixed-Race Characters and the Racial Binary in Charles Chesnutt and Ernest J. Gaines\",\"authors\":\"K. Byerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/SLI.2016.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Ernest J. Gaines has generally emphasized the importance of white writers rather than black ones in his career, he shares with Charles Chesnutt an interest in the role of mixed-race characters in narrative. Repeatedly in his brief fiction-writing career, Chesnutt engaged with both the passing tradition and the status of those who were marked as black though they clearly had white ancestry. Similarly, Gaines, in both novels and short stories, depicted the social and racial pressures on light-skinned characters.1 The focus of this essay will be on narratives of those who have been clearly labeled black regardless of ancestry. While Gaines shows little interest in stories of passing, he shares with Chesnutt a concern for Black Creoles and for those who choose or are compelled to identify as black. The texts I will be examining are Chesnutt's Paul Marchand, F. M. C. and \\\"The Wife of His Youth\\\" and Gainess Catherine Carmier and \\\"Bloodline.\\\" The two novels treat Creole characters and their status within multiracial and multiethnic societies, while the two stories focus on light-skinned men and their relationships to other blacks as well as whites. Each of these works in one way or another signifies on the tradition of the tragic mulatto/a. For example, there is no deceit or confusion on the part of the central characters about their racial category, as there is in Chesnutts House Behind the Cedars. Nor is there the angst of white and mulatto romance such as we see between Robert and Mary Agnes in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman. Instead, we find a free man of color who turns out to be white, a \\\"black\\\" man who has the arrogance and racial superiority of his white father, a family of Black Creoles who are the only members of the community who define themselves as different from blacks, and a light-skinned man who at the end of the story may or may not identify with his black past. Both authors, in effect, depict complex performances of race along the socially constructed boundary that constitutes the color line. Thus, each of them rejects straightforward ideas of essentialism, but does so in the context of his particular historical moment. For Chesnutt, this moment of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is the time of retrenchment in civil rights, white racial terrorism, and the development of a racial \\\"science\\\" that sought to give a biological, social, and anthropological basis for essentialist thinking and policies. Gaines's moment came at the high point of the civil right movement, with the emergence of black nationalism and a reversed claim of essentialism that asserted black moral superiority. Thus, it can be argued that each writer uses mixed-race characters to subvert fixed notions of race while acknowledging the power of such notions in shaping the lives of their characters. It is also worth noting that all four works involve some moral violation that extends beyond white supremacy (which both writers see as a fixed aspect of the societies they depict) and the violations of black women's bodies that produced the mixed-race characters that are their subjects. Thus, the texts create an implicit link between such figures and the moral failure that is the nation's racial ideology. In \\\"The Wife of His Youth,\\\" Chesnutt can be seen as critiquing if not satirizing the pretensions of northern, middle-class, light-skinned blacks. (2) It is worth noting that this is Chesnutt's own social category, so the story may be read as self-criticism. The central character, Mr. Ryder, has become the leader of the Blue Vein Society, so called because its members are assumed to be light enough to have visibly blue veins. While the group denies such an exclusionary requirement, Ryder himself, though slightly darker than others, establishes a standard: \\\"I have no race prejudice,\\\" he would say, \\\"but we people of mixed blood are ground between the upper and the nether millstone. Our fate lies between absorption by the white race and extinction in the black. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":390916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in the Literary Imagination\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in the Literary Imagination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2016.0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2016.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然欧内斯特·j·盖恩斯在他的写作生涯中一直强调白人作家的重要性,而不是黑人作家,但他和查尔斯·切斯纳特一样,对混血人物在叙事中的作用很感兴趣。在他短暂的小说写作生涯中,切斯纳特反复与过去的传统和那些被标记为黑人的人的地位打交道,尽管他们显然有白人血统。同样,盖恩斯在小说和短篇小说中都描绘了浅色皮肤的人物所承受的社会和种族压力这篇文章的重点将放在那些被明确标记为黑人的人的叙述上,而不管他们的祖先是什么。虽然盖恩斯对逝去的故事没什么兴趣,但他和切斯纳特一样关心黑人克里奥尔人,以及那些选择或被迫认同为黑人的人。我要研究的文本是切斯纳特的《保罗·马尔尚》和《他年轻时的妻子》,以及盖内斯·凯瑟琳·卡米尔和《血统》。这两部小说都描写了克里奥尔人及其在多种族和多民族社会中的地位,而这两部小说则侧重于浅肤色的男性以及他们与其他黑人和白人的关系。这些作品都以这样或那样的方式体现了悲剧黑白混血儿的传统。例如,没有欺骗或混淆的部分中心人物对他们的种族类别,就像在Chesnutts房子后面的雪松。也没有像我们在《简·皮特曼小姐的自传》中看到的罗伯特和玛丽·阿格尼斯之间那种白人和混血之间的焦虑。相反,我们发现了一个有色人种的自由人,结果却是白人;一个“黑人”,他有着他白人父亲的傲慢和种族优越感;一个黑人克里奥尔人的家庭,他们是社区中唯一一个将自己定义为与黑人不同的成员;一个浅肤色的人,在故事的结尾可能会也可能不会认同他的黑人过去。实际上,两位作者都沿着构成肤色线的社会建构边界描绘了复杂的种族表现。因此,他们每个人都拒绝直接的本质主义思想,但在他特定的历史时刻的背景下这样做。对切斯纳特来说,19世纪末和20世纪初的这一时刻是民权紧缩、白人种族恐怖主义和种族“科学”发展的时期,这种“科学”试图为本质主义的思想和政策提供生物学、社会和人类学基础。盖恩斯的时刻正值民权运动的高潮,当时黑人民族主义和主张黑人道德优越感的本质主义出现了逆转。因此,可以说,每个作家都使用混血角色来颠覆固定的种族观念,同时承认这种观念在塑造人物生活中的力量。同样值得注意的是,所有四部作品都涉及一些超越白人至上主义的道德侵犯(两位作家都认为这是他们所描绘的社会的一个固定方面),以及对黑人女性身体的侵犯,这些侵犯产生了作为他们主题的混血儿角色。因此,这些文本在这些人物和道德失败(即国家的种族意识形态)之间建立了一种隐含的联系。在《年轻时的妻子》中,切斯纳特即使不是在讽刺北方中产阶级浅肤色黑人的自命不凡,也是在进行批判。(2)值得注意的是,这是切斯纳特自己的社会范畴,所以这个故事可以被理解为自我批评。主角赖德已经成为“蓝脉协会”(Blue Vein Society)的领袖,之所以叫这个名字,是因为该协会的成员都被认为很轻,身上有明显的蓝脉。虽然该组织否认这种排他性的要求,但莱德自己,尽管比其他人肤色稍深,却建立了一个标准:“我没有种族偏见,”他会说,“但我们这些混血儿被磨砺在上层和下层的磨石之间。”我们的命运在被白人吸收和被黑人灭绝之间。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Exit: Mixed-Race Characters and the Racial Binary in Charles Chesnutt and Ernest J. Gaines
While Ernest J. Gaines has generally emphasized the importance of white writers rather than black ones in his career, he shares with Charles Chesnutt an interest in the role of mixed-race characters in narrative. Repeatedly in his brief fiction-writing career, Chesnutt engaged with both the passing tradition and the status of those who were marked as black though they clearly had white ancestry. Similarly, Gaines, in both novels and short stories, depicted the social and racial pressures on light-skinned characters.1 The focus of this essay will be on narratives of those who have been clearly labeled black regardless of ancestry. While Gaines shows little interest in stories of passing, he shares with Chesnutt a concern for Black Creoles and for those who choose or are compelled to identify as black. The texts I will be examining are Chesnutt's Paul Marchand, F. M. C. and "The Wife of His Youth" and Gainess Catherine Carmier and "Bloodline." The two novels treat Creole characters and their status within multiracial and multiethnic societies, while the two stories focus on light-skinned men and their relationships to other blacks as well as whites. Each of these works in one way or another signifies on the tradition of the tragic mulatto/a. For example, there is no deceit or confusion on the part of the central characters about their racial category, as there is in Chesnutts House Behind the Cedars. Nor is there the angst of white and mulatto romance such as we see between Robert and Mary Agnes in The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman. Instead, we find a free man of color who turns out to be white, a "black" man who has the arrogance and racial superiority of his white father, a family of Black Creoles who are the only members of the community who define themselves as different from blacks, and a light-skinned man who at the end of the story may or may not identify with his black past. Both authors, in effect, depict complex performances of race along the socially constructed boundary that constitutes the color line. Thus, each of them rejects straightforward ideas of essentialism, but does so in the context of his particular historical moment. For Chesnutt, this moment of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is the time of retrenchment in civil rights, white racial terrorism, and the development of a racial "science" that sought to give a biological, social, and anthropological basis for essentialist thinking and policies. Gaines's moment came at the high point of the civil right movement, with the emergence of black nationalism and a reversed claim of essentialism that asserted black moral superiority. Thus, it can be argued that each writer uses mixed-race characters to subvert fixed notions of race while acknowledging the power of such notions in shaping the lives of their characters. It is also worth noting that all four works involve some moral violation that extends beyond white supremacy (which both writers see as a fixed aspect of the societies they depict) and the violations of black women's bodies that produced the mixed-race characters that are their subjects. Thus, the texts create an implicit link between such figures and the moral failure that is the nation's racial ideology. In "The Wife of His Youth," Chesnutt can be seen as critiquing if not satirizing the pretensions of northern, middle-class, light-skinned blacks. (2) It is worth noting that this is Chesnutt's own social category, so the story may be read as self-criticism. The central character, Mr. Ryder, has become the leader of the Blue Vein Society, so called because its members are assumed to be light enough to have visibly blue veins. While the group denies such an exclusionary requirement, Ryder himself, though slightly darker than others, establishes a standard: "I have no race prejudice," he would say, "but we people of mixed blood are ground between the upper and the nether millstone. Our fate lies between absorption by the white race and extinction in the black. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信