重新解释犹太人在大屠杀期间的请愿行为:争论、跨国空间和生存

T. Kaplan
{"title":"重新解释犹太人在大屠杀期间的请愿行为:争论、跨国空间和生存","authors":"T. Kaplan","doi":"10.1080/25785648.2021.1981727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT During the 1930s and early 1940s, members of the Jewish community, converts, and men and women of partial Jewish heritage across German-controlled Europe wrote tens of thousands of petitions. As tools to redress grievances and request support, these petitions ranged from rushed appeals for exemptions from deportations to elaborate protest entreaties to fascist officials. Too readily dismissed by scholars as ‘sham possibilities,’ petitioning practices and the question of their ‘success’ were multi-layered phenomena. Even petitioners who ultimately failed could use the often lengthy petitioning process to buy time and prepare other responses such as going into hiding. This rereading of entreaties submitted in Central Europe and occupied France reveals the widespread existence of trans-European networks that connected families and communities, created unique transnational spaces, and profoundly shaped reactions during the genocide. As part of integrated histories, these transnational petitions demonstrate the need to eschew oversimplified binaries of resistance versus collaboration in favor of more complex taxonomies.","PeriodicalId":422357,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinterpreting Jewish Petitioning Practices During the Shoah: Contestation, Transnational Space, and Survival\",\"authors\":\"T. Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25785648.2021.1981727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT During the 1930s and early 1940s, members of the Jewish community, converts, and men and women of partial Jewish heritage across German-controlled Europe wrote tens of thousands of petitions. As tools to redress grievances and request support, these petitions ranged from rushed appeals for exemptions from deportations to elaborate protest entreaties to fascist officials. Too readily dismissed by scholars as ‘sham possibilities,’ petitioning practices and the question of their ‘success’ were multi-layered phenomena. Even petitioners who ultimately failed could use the often lengthy petitioning process to buy time and prepare other responses such as going into hiding. This rereading of entreaties submitted in Central Europe and occupied France reveals the widespread existence of trans-European networks that connected families and communities, created unique transnational spaces, and profoundly shaped reactions during the genocide. As part of integrated histories, these transnational petitions demonstrate the need to eschew oversimplified binaries of resistance versus collaboration in favor of more complex taxonomies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Holocaust Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Holocaust Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.1981727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Holocaust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785648.2021.1981727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪30年代和40年代初,在德国控制的欧洲,犹太社区成员、皈依者和部分犹太血统的男女写了数万份请愿书。作为纠正不满和请求支持的工具,这些请愿书从要求豁免驱逐的匆忙呼吁到向法西斯官员提出的详细抗议恳求,不一而足。上访行为及其“成功与否”的问题是多层面的现象,很容易被学者们斥为“虚假的可能性”。即使是最终失败的上访者也可以利用通常漫长的上访过程来争取时间,并准备其他回应,比如躲藏起来。重读中欧和被占领的法国提出的恳求,揭示了跨欧洲网络的广泛存在,这些网络将家庭和社区联系起来,创造了独特的跨国空间,并深刻地影响了种族灭绝期间的反应。作为综合历史的一部分,这些跨国请愿表明需要避免过于简单的抵制与合作的二元对立,而支持更复杂的分类法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinterpreting Jewish Petitioning Practices During the Shoah: Contestation, Transnational Space, and Survival
ABSTRACT During the 1930s and early 1940s, members of the Jewish community, converts, and men and women of partial Jewish heritage across German-controlled Europe wrote tens of thousands of petitions. As tools to redress grievances and request support, these petitions ranged from rushed appeals for exemptions from deportations to elaborate protest entreaties to fascist officials. Too readily dismissed by scholars as ‘sham possibilities,’ petitioning practices and the question of their ‘success’ were multi-layered phenomena. Even petitioners who ultimately failed could use the often lengthy petitioning process to buy time and prepare other responses such as going into hiding. This rereading of entreaties submitted in Central Europe and occupied France reveals the widespread existence of trans-European networks that connected families and communities, created unique transnational spaces, and profoundly shaped reactions during the genocide. As part of integrated histories, these transnational petitions demonstrate the need to eschew oversimplified binaries of resistance versus collaboration in favor of more complex taxonomies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信