多媒体学习软件的评价方法

Stéphane Crozat, O. Hû, P. Trigano
{"title":"多媒体学习软件的评价方法","authors":"Stéphane Crozat, O. Hû, P. Trigano","doi":"10.1109/MMCS.1999.779287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We submit a method (EMPI: Evaluation of Multimedia, Pedagogical and Interactive software) to evaluate multimedia software used in an educational context. Our purpose is to help users (teachers or students) to decide in front of the large choice of software actually proposed. We structured a list of evaluation criteria, grouped through six approaches: the general feeling, the technical quality, the usability, the scenario, the multimedia documents, and the didactical aspects. A global questionnaire joins all these modules. We are also designing software that could make the method easier to use and more powerful. We present the list of the criteria we selected and organised, along with some examples of questions, and a brief description of the method and the linked software.","PeriodicalId":408680,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method for evaluating multimedia learning software\",\"authors\":\"Stéphane Crozat, O. Hû, P. Trigano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MMCS.1999.779287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We submit a method (EMPI: Evaluation of Multimedia, Pedagogical and Interactive software) to evaluate multimedia software used in an educational context. Our purpose is to help users (teachers or students) to decide in front of the large choice of software actually proposed. We structured a list of evaluation criteria, grouped through six approaches: the general feeling, the technical quality, the usability, the scenario, the multimedia documents, and the didactical aspects. A global questionnaire joins all these modules. We are also designing software that could make the method easier to use and more powerful. We present the list of the criteria we selected and organised, along with some examples of questions, and a brief description of the method and the linked software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMCS.1999.779287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MMCS.1999.779287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

我们提交了一种方法(EMPI:评估多媒体,教学和互动软件)来评估在教育环境中使用的多媒体软件。我们的目的是帮助用户(老师或学生)在实际提出的大量软件选择面前做出决定。我们构建了一个评估标准列表,通过六种方法进行分组:总体感觉、技术质量、可用性、场景、多媒体文档和教学方面。一个全局问卷将所有这些模块连接起来。我们还在设计软件,使这种方法更容易使用,功能更强大。我们列出了我们选择和组织的标准,以及一些问题的例子,以及对方法和相关软件的简要描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A method for evaluating multimedia learning software
We submit a method (EMPI: Evaluation of Multimedia, Pedagogical and Interactive software) to evaluate multimedia software used in an educational context. Our purpose is to help users (teachers or students) to decide in front of the large choice of software actually proposed. We structured a list of evaluation criteria, grouped through six approaches: the general feeling, the technical quality, the usability, the scenario, the multimedia documents, and the didactical aspects. A global questionnaire joins all these modules. We are also designing software that could make the method easier to use and more powerful. We present the list of the criteria we selected and organised, along with some examples of questions, and a brief description of the method and the linked software.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信