白质束状图监督分割距离的比较

E. Olivetti, Giulia Bertò, P. Gori, N. Sharmin, P. Avesani
{"title":"白质束状图监督分割距离的比较","authors":"E. Olivetti, Giulia Bertò, P. Gori, N. Sharmin, P. Avesani","doi":"10.1109/PRNI.2017.7981502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tractograms are mathematical representations of the main paths of axons within the white matter of the brain, from diffusion MRI data. Such representations are in the form of polylines, called streamlines, and one streamline approximates the common path of tens of thousands of axons. The analysis of tractograms is a task of interest in multiple fields, like neurosurgery and neurology. A basic building block of many pipelines of analysis is the definition of a distance function between streamlines. Multiple distance functions have been proposed in the literature, and different authors use different distances, usually without a specific reason other than invoking the “common practice”. To this end, in this work we want to test such common practices, in order to obtain factual reasons for choosing one distance over another. For these reason, in this work we compare many streamline distance functions available in the literature. We focus on the common task of automatic bundle segmentation and we adopt the recent approach of supervised segmentation from expert-based examples. Using the HCP dataset, we compare several distances obtaining guidelines on the choice of which distance function one should use for supervised bundle segmentation.","PeriodicalId":429199,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of distances for supervised segmentation of white matter tractography\",\"authors\":\"E. Olivetti, Giulia Bertò, P. Gori, N. Sharmin, P. Avesani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRNI.2017.7981502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tractograms are mathematical representations of the main paths of axons within the white matter of the brain, from diffusion MRI data. Such representations are in the form of polylines, called streamlines, and one streamline approximates the common path of tens of thousands of axons. The analysis of tractograms is a task of interest in multiple fields, like neurosurgery and neurology. A basic building block of many pipelines of analysis is the definition of a distance function between streamlines. Multiple distance functions have been proposed in the literature, and different authors use different distances, usually without a specific reason other than invoking the “common practice”. To this end, in this work we want to test such common practices, in order to obtain factual reasons for choosing one distance over another. For these reason, in this work we compare many streamline distance functions available in the literature. We focus on the common task of automatic bundle segmentation and we adopt the recent approach of supervised segmentation from expert-based examples. Using the HCP dataset, we compare several distances obtaining guidelines on the choice of which distance function one should use for supervised bundle segmentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2017.7981502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging (PRNI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2017.7981502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

束状图是脑白质内轴突主要路径的数学表示,来自扩散MRI数据。这种表现形式是折线的形式,称为流线,一条流线近似于成千上万个轴突的共同路径。束状图的分析是许多领域都感兴趣的任务,如神经外科和神经学。许多分析管道的基本构建块是流线之间距离函数的定义。文献中提出了多个距离函数,不同的作者使用不同的距离,通常没有特定的原因,只是援引“惯例”。为此,在这项工作中,我们想测试这些常见的做法,以便获得选择一种距离而不是另一种距离的事实理由。由于这些原因,在这项工作中,我们比较了文献中可用的许多流线距离函数。我们专注于自动束分割的常见任务,并采用最新的基于专家的监督分割方法。使用HCP数据集,我们比较了几个距离,获得了应该使用哪个距离函数进行监督束分割的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of distances for supervised segmentation of white matter tractography
Tractograms are mathematical representations of the main paths of axons within the white matter of the brain, from diffusion MRI data. Such representations are in the form of polylines, called streamlines, and one streamline approximates the common path of tens of thousands of axons. The analysis of tractograms is a task of interest in multiple fields, like neurosurgery and neurology. A basic building block of many pipelines of analysis is the definition of a distance function between streamlines. Multiple distance functions have been proposed in the literature, and different authors use different distances, usually without a specific reason other than invoking the “common practice”. To this end, in this work we want to test such common practices, in order to obtain factual reasons for choosing one distance over another. For these reason, in this work we compare many streamline distance functions available in the literature. We focus on the common task of automatic bundle segmentation and we adopt the recent approach of supervised segmentation from expert-based examples. Using the HCP dataset, we compare several distances obtaining guidelines on the choice of which distance function one should use for supervised bundle segmentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信