虚假陈述、非自愿退市与投资者保护——中国证券市场错位监管的困境

Haifan Hu
{"title":"虚假陈述、非自愿退市与投资者保护——中国证券市场错位监管的困境","authors":"Haifan Hu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3007037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 21 March 2016 the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued its first ever decision to compulsorily delist a company on the ground of seriously breaching the disclosure norms. It is the first case applying the China Securities Regulatory Commission’s 2015 delisting regulation and has substantial implications for the future operation of the delisting system in China. The effectiveness of the delisting system, particularly in regard to the issue of misrepresentation, largely depends on the functioning of the Supreme People’s Court’s Judicial Interpretation issued in 2003. By virtue of examining the legislative purpose in the context of specific procedural devices adopted in the 2003 Interpretation, this article identifies the unfortunate status of investors and the causes thereof under China’s political and economic circumstances. It argues that the delisting system, which is built upon the unsatisfactory regime of investor protection, has put investors in a more disadvantageous position facing increased uncertainty and unpredictability. By going through crucial statutory provisions in the 2003 Interpretation and the delisting regulation, this article illustrates how the judiciary, the administrative authorities and the investors interact on this uneven playing field of stock market.","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misrepresentation, Involuntary Delisting and Investor Protection - The Dilemma of Dislocated Regulation on Chinese Securities Market\",\"authors\":\"Haifan Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3007037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 21 March 2016 the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued its first ever decision to compulsorily delist a company on the ground of seriously breaching the disclosure norms. It is the first case applying the China Securities Regulatory Commission’s 2015 delisting regulation and has substantial implications for the future operation of the delisting system in China. The effectiveness of the delisting system, particularly in regard to the issue of misrepresentation, largely depends on the functioning of the Supreme People’s Court’s Judicial Interpretation issued in 2003. By virtue of examining the legislative purpose in the context of specific procedural devices adopted in the 2003 Interpretation, this article identifies the unfortunate status of investors and the causes thereof under China’s political and economic circumstances. It argues that the delisting system, which is built upon the unsatisfactory regime of investor protection, has put investors in a more disadvantageous position facing increased uncertainty and unpredictability. By going through crucial statutory provisions in the 2003 Interpretation and the delisting regulation, this article illustrates how the judiciary, the administrative authorities and the investors interact on this uneven playing field of stock market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3007037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3007037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年3月21日,上海证券交易所首次以严重违反信息披露规范为由强制退市。这是首例适用中国证监会2015年退市规定的案例,对中国退市制度的未来运作具有重大影响。除名制度的有效性,特别是在虚假陈述问题上的有效性,在很大程度上取决于2003年最高人民法院发布的司法解释的功能。本文通过考察2003年《解释》所采用的具体程序手段的立法目的,明确了投资者在中国政治经济环境下的不幸地位及其原因。它认为,退市制度建立在令人不满意的投资者保护制度之上,使投资者处于更加不利的地位,面临越来越多的不确定性和不可预测性。本文通过对2003年《解释》中的重要法律规定和退市规定的梳理,阐述了司法机关、行政机关和投资者在这个不公平的证券市场中是如何相互作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misrepresentation, Involuntary Delisting and Investor Protection - The Dilemma of Dislocated Regulation on Chinese Securities Market
On 21 March 2016 the Shanghai Stock Exchange issued its first ever decision to compulsorily delist a company on the ground of seriously breaching the disclosure norms. It is the first case applying the China Securities Regulatory Commission’s 2015 delisting regulation and has substantial implications for the future operation of the delisting system in China. The effectiveness of the delisting system, particularly in regard to the issue of misrepresentation, largely depends on the functioning of the Supreme People’s Court’s Judicial Interpretation issued in 2003. By virtue of examining the legislative purpose in the context of specific procedural devices adopted in the 2003 Interpretation, this article identifies the unfortunate status of investors and the causes thereof under China’s political and economic circumstances. It argues that the delisting system, which is built upon the unsatisfactory regime of investor protection, has put investors in a more disadvantageous position facing increased uncertainty and unpredictability. By going through crucial statutory provisions in the 2003 Interpretation and the delisting regulation, this article illustrates how the judiciary, the administrative authorities and the investors interact on this uneven playing field of stock market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信