上帝引导的契约和圣经的主权

Endre Sashalmi
{"title":"上帝引导的契约和圣经的主权","authors":"Endre Sashalmi","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study intends to examine the two related concepts of contract and sovereignty which (practically unknown in Muscovite Russia) are commonly referred to as proofs of dominance of western concepts in PVM. By examining these concepts in the text I try to point out the Muscovite legacy of the argumentation. I claim that the contract of government between the people and the ruler contains the Muscovite idea of God acting through the people (\"the will of the people is the will of God\" — the crucial premise legitimating succession both in 1598 and 1613 in official documents) while the concept of sovereignty is predominantly justified by traditional references to the Bible and not so much by arguments taken from western political theory.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"God-Guided Contract and Scriptural Sovereignty\",\"authors\":\"Endre Sashalmi\",\"doi\":\"10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study intends to examine the two related concepts of contract and sovereignty which (practically unknown in Muscovite Russia) are commonly referred to as proofs of dominance of western concepts in PVM. By examining these concepts in the text I try to point out the Muscovite legacy of the argumentation. I claim that the contract of government between the people and the ruler contains the Muscovite idea of God acting through the people (\\\"the will of the people is the will of God\\\" — the crucial premise legitimating succession both in 1598 and 1613 in official documents) while the concept of sovereignty is predominantly justified by traditional references to the Bible and not so much by arguments taken from western political theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在考察契约和主权这两个相关概念(在俄罗斯莫斯科几乎不为人知),这两个概念通常被认为是西方概念在PVM中占主导地位的证据。通过检查文本中的这些概念,我试图指出论证的莫斯科遗产。我认为,人民和统治者之间的政府契约包含了莫斯科人的观念,即上帝通过人民行事(“人民的意志就是上帝的意志”——这是1598年和1613年官方文件中确立继承权合法性的关键前提),而主权概念主要是通过传统的《圣经》来证明的,而不是通过西方政治理论来证明的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
God-Guided Contract and Scriptural Sovereignty
The study intends to examine the two related concepts of contract and sovereignty which (practically unknown in Muscovite Russia) are commonly referred to as proofs of dominance of western concepts in PVM. By examining these concepts in the text I try to point out the Muscovite legacy of the argumentation. I claim that the contract of government between the people and the ruler contains the Muscovite idea of God acting through the people ("the will of the people is the will of God" — the crucial premise legitimating succession both in 1598 and 1613 in official documents) while the concept of sovereignty is predominantly justified by traditional references to the Bible and not so much by arguments taken from western political theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信