在收入动态面板研究中衡量家庭财富:退休资产的作用

Daniel H. Cooper, Karen E. Dynan, Hannah Rhodenhiser
{"title":"在收入动态面板研究中衡量家庭财富:退休资产的作用","authors":"Daniel H. Cooper, Karen E. Dynan, Hannah Rhodenhiser","doi":"10.29412/RES.WP.2019.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) has much to offer researchers studying household behavior, one limitation is that its summary measure of wealth is not as broad as those of other commonly used surveys, such as the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), because it does not include the value of defined-contribution (DC) pensions. This paper describes the pension data available in the PSID and shows how they can be used to create a more comprehensive picture of household finances. We then compare various measures derived from these data with their counterparts from the SCF. Along a number of dimensions, the PSID data line up fairly well. Notably, an augmented summary measure of PSID wealth that includes the value of DC pensions is considerably closer to the SCF summary measure than to the standard measure for the median household. We conclude by presenting several examples of research areas where using a broader measure of wealth might be important.","PeriodicalId":430314,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","volume":"558 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Household Wealth in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: The Role of Retirement Assets\",\"authors\":\"Daniel H. Cooper, Karen E. Dynan, Hannah Rhodenhiser\",\"doi\":\"10.29412/RES.WP.2019.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) has much to offer researchers studying household behavior, one limitation is that its summary measure of wealth is not as broad as those of other commonly used surveys, such as the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), because it does not include the value of defined-contribution (DC) pensions. This paper describes the pension data available in the PSID and shows how they can be used to create a more comprehensive picture of household finances. We then compare various measures derived from these data with their counterparts from the SCF. Along a number of dimensions, the PSID data line up fairly well. Notably, an augmented summary measure of PSID wealth that includes the value of DC pensions is considerably closer to the SCF summary measure than to the standard measure for the median household. We conclude by presenting several examples of research areas where using a broader measure of wealth might be important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"558 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29412/RES.WP.2019.06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29412/RES.WP.2019.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然收入动态小组研究(PSID)为研究家庭行为的研究人员提供了很多东西,但它的一个局限性是,它对财富的总结衡量不像其他常用的调查(如消费者财务调查(SCF))那样广泛,因为它不包括固定缴款(DC)养老金的价值。本文介绍了PSID中可用的养老金数据,并展示了如何使用这些数据来更全面地了解家庭财务状况。然后,我们将从这些数据中得出的各种措施与SCF的对应措施进行比较。在许多维度上,PSID数据排列得相当好。值得注意的是,包括DC养老金价值在内的PSID财富的增强汇总衡量标准比中位数家庭的标准衡量标准更接近SCF汇总衡量标准。最后,我们提出了几个研究领域的例子,在这些领域中,使用更广泛的财富衡量标准可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Household Wealth in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: The Role of Retirement Assets
While the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) has much to offer researchers studying household behavior, one limitation is that its summary measure of wealth is not as broad as those of other commonly used surveys, such as the Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF), because it does not include the value of defined-contribution (DC) pensions. This paper describes the pension data available in the PSID and shows how they can be used to create a more comprehensive picture of household finances. We then compare various measures derived from these data with their counterparts from the SCF. Along a number of dimensions, the PSID data line up fairly well. Notably, an augmented summary measure of PSID wealth that includes the value of DC pensions is considerably closer to the SCF summary measure than to the standard measure for the median household. We conclude by presenting several examples of research areas where using a broader measure of wealth might be important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信