安乐死和协助自杀:痛苦中的甜蜜

Victoria Ajibola Adeleke
{"title":"安乐死和协助自杀:痛苦中的甜蜜","authors":"Victoria Ajibola Adeleke","doi":"10.19184/idj.v4i1.37343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a review of the concepts of euthanasia and assisted suicide is conducted. It begins by describing the historical trends from the beginning of the 20th century to the modern-day view. In doing this, some notable cases of these practices in the identified periods are discussed in a separate section. This qualitative study revealed that the doctrine of assisted suicide and the practice of euthanasia differ for different regions. This paper further analysed the argument for and against the doctrine of euthanasia. The theories and the school of thoughts on euthanasia are being examined. The study gives a clue to Nigeria legal perspective on euthanasia. The method of the study adopted was doctrinal in nature with the aid of textbooks, articles and internet sources. The research recommends among others, the improvement of Nigeria Constitution and legislation to promote and protect its citizen’s  basic right to human dignity, personal liberty, freedom of thought and right to life as embedded in Chapter IV of the Constitution and to support their health care right. It further notes that there is absolutely no evidence of harms to society or to vulnerable individuals as a result of legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia, rather than depriving competent adults who want to die sooner their freedom of choice. \nKeywords: Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, Human Rights, Medical Ethics","PeriodicalId":133876,"journal":{"name":"INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON LAW, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Sweetness in Bitterness\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Ajibola Adeleke\",\"doi\":\"10.19184/idj.v4i1.37343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a review of the concepts of euthanasia and assisted suicide is conducted. It begins by describing the historical trends from the beginning of the 20th century to the modern-day view. In doing this, some notable cases of these practices in the identified periods are discussed in a separate section. This qualitative study revealed that the doctrine of assisted suicide and the practice of euthanasia differ for different regions. This paper further analysed the argument for and against the doctrine of euthanasia. The theories and the school of thoughts on euthanasia are being examined. The study gives a clue to Nigeria legal perspective on euthanasia. The method of the study adopted was doctrinal in nature with the aid of textbooks, articles and internet sources. The research recommends among others, the improvement of Nigeria Constitution and legislation to promote and protect its citizen’s  basic right to human dignity, personal liberty, freedom of thought and right to life as embedded in Chapter IV of the Constitution and to support their health care right. It further notes that there is absolutely no evidence of harms to society or to vulnerable individuals as a result of legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia, rather than depriving competent adults who want to die sooner their freedom of choice. \\nKeywords: Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, Human Rights, Medical Ethics\",\"PeriodicalId\":133876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON LAW, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON LAW, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19184/idj.v4i1.37343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL ON LAW, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/idj.v4i1.37343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对安乐死和协助自杀的概念进行了综述。它首先描述了从20世纪初到现代观点的历史趋势。在这样做的过程中,在一个单独的部分中讨论了这些实践在确定时期的一些值得注意的案例。该定性研究揭示了不同地区对协助自杀的理论和安乐死的实践存在差异。本文进一步分析了赞成和反对安乐死学说的争论。有关安乐死的理论和思想流派正在接受审查。该研究为尼日利亚对安乐死的法律观点提供了线索。采用的研究方法本质上是理论性的,借助于教科书、文章和网络资源。除其他外,该研究建议改进尼日利亚宪法和立法,以促进和保护《宪法》第四章所载的公民享有人的尊严、人身自由、思想自由和生命权的基本权利,并支持他们的保健权。它进一步指出,绝对没有证据表明协助自杀和安乐死合法化会对社会或弱势个人造成伤害,而不是剥夺想要早死的有能力的成年人的选择自由。关键词:安乐死;医生协助自杀;人权
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Sweetness in Bitterness
In this paper, a review of the concepts of euthanasia and assisted suicide is conducted. It begins by describing the historical trends from the beginning of the 20th century to the modern-day view. In doing this, some notable cases of these practices in the identified periods are discussed in a separate section. This qualitative study revealed that the doctrine of assisted suicide and the practice of euthanasia differ for different regions. This paper further analysed the argument for and against the doctrine of euthanasia. The theories and the school of thoughts on euthanasia are being examined. The study gives a clue to Nigeria legal perspective on euthanasia. The method of the study adopted was doctrinal in nature with the aid of textbooks, articles and internet sources. The research recommends among others, the improvement of Nigeria Constitution and legislation to promote and protect its citizen’s  basic right to human dignity, personal liberty, freedom of thought and right to life as embedded in Chapter IV of the Constitution and to support their health care right. It further notes that there is absolutely no evidence of harms to society or to vulnerable individuals as a result of legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia, rather than depriving competent adults who want to die sooner their freedom of choice. Keywords: Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, Human Rights, Medical Ethics
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信