跨国收购中的政治敌意:发达市场中emnc的市场与非市场策略

Ru-Shiun Liou, L. Brown, Dinesh Hasija
{"title":"跨国收购中的政治敌意:发达市场中emnc的市场与非市场策略","authors":"Ru-Shiun Liou, L. Brown, Dinesh Hasija","doi":"10.1108/MBR-02-2020-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMany multinational corporations that originate from emerging economies (emerging market multinational corporations (EMNCs)) opt for acquiring a target firm in a developed market to expediently upgrade their strategic capabilities. To successfully achieve their strategic goals in the developed markets, EMNCs may use market actions and nonmarket actions to mitigate the potential risk derived from the national political differences between their home emerging economy and host developed economy. This paper aims to extend the legitimacy-based view of political risk to study the influence of political animosity – defined as misalignment of the host-home countries’ national interests – on the EMNCs’ market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this paper, we examine all EMNCs that made cross-border acquisitions of the USA targets from 2005 to 2011. The final sample consists of 252 acquisitions originating from 25 emerging markets. This paper used Tobit regression analysis to test the direct and moderating hypotheses.\n\n\nFindings\nFacing a high level of political animosity between their home country and the host developed economy, EMNCs use a market strategy by acquiring less ownership stake in the developed market, as well as engage in a nonmarket strategy by increasing lobbying activities. In addition, because of the heightened legitimacy concerns of developed market shareholders, cross-listed EMNCs have a greater tendency than non-cross-listed EMNCs to improve their legitimacy through their market and nonmarket strategy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe current paper sheds light on EMNCs’ international strategy in developed markets by examining both market and nonmarket actions. EMNCs are shown to be strongly motivated to engage in acquisitions in developed markets so they can acquire invaluable strategic resources, such as brands and distribution channels, to compete with the developed market multinationals. A sophisticated ownership strategy and corporate political activities are invaluable for EMNCs to catch up with developed market multinationals.\n","PeriodicalId":108650,"journal":{"name":"The Multinational Business Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political animosity in cross-border acquisitions: EMNCs’ market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market\",\"authors\":\"Ru-Shiun Liou, L. Brown, Dinesh Hasija\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/MBR-02-2020-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMany multinational corporations that originate from emerging economies (emerging market multinational corporations (EMNCs)) opt for acquiring a target firm in a developed market to expediently upgrade their strategic capabilities. To successfully achieve their strategic goals in the developed markets, EMNCs may use market actions and nonmarket actions to mitigate the potential risk derived from the national political differences between their home emerging economy and host developed economy. This paper aims to extend the legitimacy-based view of political risk to study the influence of political animosity – defined as misalignment of the host-home countries’ national interests – on the EMNCs’ market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn this paper, we examine all EMNCs that made cross-border acquisitions of the USA targets from 2005 to 2011. The final sample consists of 252 acquisitions originating from 25 emerging markets. This paper used Tobit regression analysis to test the direct and moderating hypotheses.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFacing a high level of political animosity between their home country and the host developed economy, EMNCs use a market strategy by acquiring less ownership stake in the developed market, as well as engage in a nonmarket strategy by increasing lobbying activities. In addition, because of the heightened legitimacy concerns of developed market shareholders, cross-listed EMNCs have a greater tendency than non-cross-listed EMNCs to improve their legitimacy through their market and nonmarket strategy.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe current paper sheds light on EMNCs’ international strategy in developed markets by examining both market and nonmarket actions. EMNCs are shown to be strongly motivated to engage in acquisitions in developed markets so they can acquire invaluable strategic resources, such as brands and distribution channels, to compete with the developed market multinationals. A sophisticated ownership strategy and corporate political activities are invaluable for EMNCs to catch up with developed market multinationals.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":108650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Multinational Business Review\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Multinational Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2020-0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Multinational Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2020-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

许多来自新兴经济体的跨国公司(新兴市场跨国公司(emnc))选择收购发达市场的目标公司,以方便地提升其战略能力。为了成功地实现其在发达市场的战略目标,新兴市场国家企业可以使用市场行动和非市场行动来减轻其母国新兴经济体和东道国发达经济体之间的国家政治差异所带来的潜在风险。本文旨在将基于合法性的政治风险观点扩展到研究政治敌意——定义为东道国与母国国家利益的错位——对新兴市场国家在发达市场的市场和非市场战略的影响。在本文中,我们研究了2005年至2011年间对美国目标进行跨境收购的所有emnc。最后的样本包括来自25个新兴市场的252笔收购。本文采用Tobit回归分析对直接假设和调节假设进行检验。面对母国与东道国发达经济体之间的高度政治敌意,新兴市场跨国公司采用市场战略,减少在发达市场的所有权份额,同时采用非市场战略,增加游说活动。此外,由于发达市场股东对合法性的担忧加剧,交叉上市的新兴市场企业比非交叉上市的新兴市场企业更倾向于通过市场和非市场战略来提高其合法性。原创性/价值本文通过分析市场和非市场行为,揭示了新兴市场公司在发达市场的国际战略。研究表明,新兴市场跨国公司有强烈的动机在发达市场进行收购,以便它们能够获得宝贵的战略资源,如品牌和分销渠道,以与发达市场的跨国公司竞争。复杂的所有权战略和公司政治活动对新兴市场跨国公司追赶发达市场跨国公司至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political animosity in cross-border acquisitions: EMNCs’ market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market
Purpose Many multinational corporations that originate from emerging economies (emerging market multinational corporations (EMNCs)) opt for acquiring a target firm in a developed market to expediently upgrade their strategic capabilities. To successfully achieve their strategic goals in the developed markets, EMNCs may use market actions and nonmarket actions to mitigate the potential risk derived from the national political differences between their home emerging economy and host developed economy. This paper aims to extend the legitimacy-based view of political risk to study the influence of political animosity – defined as misalignment of the host-home countries’ national interests – on the EMNCs’ market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, we examine all EMNCs that made cross-border acquisitions of the USA targets from 2005 to 2011. The final sample consists of 252 acquisitions originating from 25 emerging markets. This paper used Tobit regression analysis to test the direct and moderating hypotheses. Findings Facing a high level of political animosity between their home country and the host developed economy, EMNCs use a market strategy by acquiring less ownership stake in the developed market, as well as engage in a nonmarket strategy by increasing lobbying activities. In addition, because of the heightened legitimacy concerns of developed market shareholders, cross-listed EMNCs have a greater tendency than non-cross-listed EMNCs to improve their legitimacy through their market and nonmarket strategy. Originality/value The current paper sheds light on EMNCs’ international strategy in developed markets by examining both market and nonmarket actions. EMNCs are shown to be strongly motivated to engage in acquisitions in developed markets so they can acquire invaluable strategic resources, such as brands and distribution channels, to compete with the developed market multinationals. A sophisticated ownership strategy and corporate political activities are invaluable for EMNCs to catch up with developed market multinationals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信