{"title":"改进基于历史的分支预测器性能的方法","authors":"Tieling Xie, Y. Chu, J. H. Park","doi":"10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the aliasing problems in global-history-based and local-history-based branch predictors and presents two approaches to improve the performance of global-history-based branch predictors. Global-history-based predictors have more critical aliasing problems but show the better performance than local-history-based predictors. Therefore, our approaches mainly focus on alleviating the aliasing problems for global-history-based predictors. The performance of each approach is evaluated and compared by using the Simplescalar simulator with SPEC95CINT benchmark programs. Our experimental results show that the approaches outperform conventional global-history-based branch predictors.","PeriodicalId":346880,"journal":{"name":"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to improve performance for history-based branch predictors\",\"authors\":\"Tieling Xie, Y. Chu, J. H. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the aliasing problems in global-history-based and local-history-based branch predictors and presents two approaches to improve the performance of global-history-based branch predictors. Global-history-based predictors have more critical aliasing problems but show the better performance than local-history-based predictors. Therefore, our approaches mainly focus on alleviating the aliasing problems for global-history-based predictors. The performance of each approach is evaluated and compared by using the Simplescalar simulator with SPEC95CINT benchmark programs. Our experimental results show that the approaches outperform conventional global-history-based branch predictors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PACRIM. 2005 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and signal Processing, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACRIM.2005.1517240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Approaches to improve performance for history-based branch predictors
This paper investigates the aliasing problems in global-history-based and local-history-based branch predictors and presents two approaches to improve the performance of global-history-based branch predictors. Global-history-based predictors have more critical aliasing problems but show the better performance than local-history-based predictors. Therefore, our approaches mainly focus on alleviating the aliasing problems for global-history-based predictors. The performance of each approach is evaluated and compared by using the Simplescalar simulator with SPEC95CINT benchmark programs. Our experimental results show that the approaches outperform conventional global-history-based branch predictors.