苏格拉底与蒂迈奥:两个柏拉图式的哲学范式

Epoch Pub Date : 2011-10-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE201015232
C. Zuckert
{"title":"苏格拉底与蒂迈奥:两个柏拉图式的哲学范式","authors":"C. Zuckert","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE201015232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plato's Timaeus is usually taken to be a sequel to the Republic which shows the cosmological basis of Plato's politics. In this article I challenge the traditional understanding by arguing that neither Critias's nor Timaeus's speech performs the assigned function. The contrast between Timaeus's monologue and the silently listening Socrates dramatizes the philosophical differences between investigations of \"the human things\", like those conducted by Socrates, and attempts to demonstrate the intelligible, mathematically calculable order of the sensible natural world, like that of Timaeus.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socrates and Timaeus: Two Platonic Paradigms of Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"C. Zuckert\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE201015232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Plato's Timaeus is usually taken to be a sequel to the Republic which shows the cosmological basis of Plato's politics. In this article I challenge the traditional understanding by arguing that neither Critias's nor Timaeus's speech performs the assigned function. The contrast between Timaeus's monologue and the silently listening Socrates dramatizes the philosophical differences between investigations of \\\"the human things\\\", like those conducted by Socrates, and attempts to demonstrate the intelligible, mathematically calculable order of the sensible natural world, like that of Timaeus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

柏拉图的《蒂迈奥》通常被认为是《理想国》的续集,后者展示了柏拉图政治的宇宙学基础。在这篇文章中,我挑战了传统的理解,认为克里提亚和蒂迈奥的演讲都没有履行指定的功能。蒂迈乌斯的独白和苏格拉底的沉默倾听之间的对比,戏剧性地体现了哲学上的差异,对“人类事物”的研究,如苏格拉底所做的,和试图证明可理解的,数学上可计算的自然世界的秩序,如蒂迈乌斯的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socrates and Timaeus: Two Platonic Paradigms of Philosophy
Plato's Timaeus is usually taken to be a sequel to the Republic which shows the cosmological basis of Plato's politics. In this article I challenge the traditional understanding by arguing that neither Critias's nor Timaeus's speech performs the assigned function. The contrast between Timaeus's monologue and the silently listening Socrates dramatizes the philosophical differences between investigations of "the human things", like those conducted by Socrates, and attempts to demonstrate the intelligible, mathematically calculable order of the sensible natural world, like that of Timaeus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信