M. Machulda, Clinton E. Hagen, H. Wiste, M. Mielke, D. Knopman, R. Roberts, P. Vemuri, V. Lowe, C. Jack, R. Petersen
{"title":"临床正常老年人的练习效果和纵向认知变化因阿尔茨海默病成像生物标志物状态而异","authors":"M. Machulda, Clinton E. Hagen, H. Wiste, M. Mielke, D. Knopman, R. Roberts, P. Vemuri, V. Lowe, C. Jack, R. Petersen","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2016.1241303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to examine practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in 190 clinically normal elderly classified according to a two-feature biomarker model for Alzheimer’s disease.Methods: All participants completed neuropsychological testing, MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET at their baseline evaluation. We divided participants into four groups based on neuroimaging measures of amyloid (A+ or A−) and neurodegeneration (N+ or N−) and reexamined cognition at 15- and 30-month intervals.Results: The A−N− group showed significant improvements in the memory and global scores. The A+N− group also showed significant improvements in the memory and global scores as well as attention. The A−N+ group showed a significant decline in attention at 30 months. The A+N+ group showed significant improvements in memory and the global score at 15 months followed by a significant decline in the global score at 30 months.Conclusion: Amyloidosis in the absence of neurodegeneration did not have an adverse impact on practice effects or the 30-month cognitive trajectories. In contrast, participants with neurodegeneration (either A−N+ or A+N+) had worse performance at the 30-month follow-up. Our results show that neurodegeneration has a more deleterious effect on cognition than amyloidosis in clinically normal individuals.","PeriodicalId":197334,"journal":{"name":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in clinically normal older adults differ by Alzheimer imaging biomarker status\",\"authors\":\"M. Machulda, Clinton E. Hagen, H. Wiste, M. Mielke, D. Knopman, R. Roberts, P. Vemuri, V. Lowe, C. Jack, R. Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2016.1241303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to examine practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in 190 clinically normal elderly classified according to a two-feature biomarker model for Alzheimer’s disease.Methods: All participants completed neuropsychological testing, MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET at their baseline evaluation. We divided participants into four groups based on neuroimaging measures of amyloid (A+ or A−) and neurodegeneration (N+ or N−) and reexamined cognition at 15- and 30-month intervals.Results: The A−N− group showed significant improvements in the memory and global scores. The A+N− group also showed significant improvements in the memory and global scores as well as attention. The A−N+ group showed a significant decline in attention at 30 months. The A+N+ group showed significant improvements in memory and the global score at 15 months followed by a significant decline in the global score at 30 months.Conclusion: Amyloidosis in the absence of neurodegeneration did not have an adverse impact on practice effects or the 30-month cognitive trajectories. In contrast, participants with neurodegeneration (either A−N+ or A+N+) had worse performance at the 30-month follow-up. Our results show that neurodegeneration has a more deleterious effect on cognition than amyloidosis in clinically normal individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Clinical neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Clinical neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1241303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinical neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1241303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45
摘要
摘要目的:本研究的目的是研究190名临床正常老年人阿尔茨海默病双特征生物标志物模型的实践效果和纵向认知变化。方法:所有参与者在基线评估时完成神经心理测试、MRI、FDG-PET和PiB-PET。我们根据淀粉样蛋白(A+或A -)和神经退行性变(N+或N -)的神经影像学指标将参与者分为四组,并每隔15个月和30个月重新检查认知能力。结果:A - N -组在记忆和整体评分方面有显著改善。A+N -组在记忆力、整体得分和注意力方面也有显著改善。A−N+组在30个月时的注意力显著下降。A+N+组在15个月时表现出记忆力和整体得分的显著改善,随后在30个月时整体得分显著下降。结论:无神经退行性变的淀粉样变性对练习效果或30个月的认知轨迹没有不利影响。相比之下,神经退行性变(A−N+或A+N+)的参与者在30个月的随访中表现更差。我们的研究结果表明,在临床正常个体中,神经变性对认知的有害影响比淀粉样变更大。
Practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in clinically normal older adults differ by Alzheimer imaging biomarker status
Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to examine practice effects and longitudinal cognitive change in 190 clinically normal elderly classified according to a two-feature biomarker model for Alzheimer’s disease.Methods: All participants completed neuropsychological testing, MRI, FDG-PET, and PiB-PET at their baseline evaluation. We divided participants into four groups based on neuroimaging measures of amyloid (A+ or A−) and neurodegeneration (N+ or N−) and reexamined cognition at 15- and 30-month intervals.Results: The A−N− group showed significant improvements in the memory and global scores. The A+N− group also showed significant improvements in the memory and global scores as well as attention. The A−N+ group showed a significant decline in attention at 30 months. The A+N+ group showed significant improvements in memory and the global score at 15 months followed by a significant decline in the global score at 30 months.Conclusion: Amyloidosis in the absence of neurodegeneration did not have an adverse impact on practice effects or the 30-month cognitive trajectories. In contrast, participants with neurodegeneration (either A−N+ or A+N+) had worse performance at the 30-month follow-up. Our results show that neurodegeneration has a more deleterious effect on cognition than amyloidosis in clinically normal individuals.