上睑成形术中尖头电灼切口和冷刀切口的术后疗效和患者-外科医生满意度的比较:队列研究

A. Boz
{"title":"上睑成形术中尖头电灼切口和冷刀切口的术后疗效和患者-外科医生满意度的比较:队列研究","authors":"A. Boz","doi":"10.14744/eer.2023.28291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The objective of the study is to compare post-operative outcomes and patient-surgeon satisfaction between a needle-tipped electrocautery incision and a cold scalpel incision in upper eyelid blepharoplasty Methods: The data from 247 patients who underwent bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty with ptosis surgery or fat pad removal were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group 1 - needle-tipped electrocautery incision and Group 2 - a cold scalpel incision. Pre-operative skin types of the patients, perioperative hemorrhage, and surgical time were observed. Post-operative ecchymosis on days 1 and 7 and scar cosmesis at months 1 and 6 were evaluated. Patients were asked about the level of satisfaction at 6 months. Results: One hundred and fifty-five patients, 75 patients in Group 1 and 80 patients in Group 2, were included in the study. No statistical differences were detected between the two groups for age, sex, and skin type. No serious complications were recorded. For surgeon satisfaction, surgical time and hemorrhage amount were statistically significantly lower in Group 1. Post-operative ecchymosis on days 1 and 7, scar cosmesis at months 1 and 6, and patient satisfaction at 6 months, the scores were similar between the groups. Conclusion: The clinical difference between needle-tipped electrocautery and cold scalpel incision was not observed after upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Needle-tipped electrocautery should be used conveniently and reliably for skin incisions in upper eyelid blepharoplasty for good cosmetic results.","PeriodicalId":350672,"journal":{"name":"European Eye Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of post-operative outcomes and patient-surgeon satisfaction with a needle-tipped electrocautery incision and a cold scalpel incision in upper eyelid blepharoplasty: Cohort study\",\"authors\":\"A. Boz\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eer.2023.28291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The objective of the study is to compare post-operative outcomes and patient-surgeon satisfaction between a needle-tipped electrocautery incision and a cold scalpel incision in upper eyelid blepharoplasty Methods: The data from 247 patients who underwent bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty with ptosis surgery or fat pad removal were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group 1 - needle-tipped electrocautery incision and Group 2 - a cold scalpel incision. Pre-operative skin types of the patients, perioperative hemorrhage, and surgical time were observed. Post-operative ecchymosis on days 1 and 7 and scar cosmesis at months 1 and 6 were evaluated. Patients were asked about the level of satisfaction at 6 months. Results: One hundred and fifty-five patients, 75 patients in Group 1 and 80 patients in Group 2, were included in the study. No statistical differences were detected between the two groups for age, sex, and skin type. No serious complications were recorded. For surgeon satisfaction, surgical time and hemorrhage amount were statistically significantly lower in Group 1. Post-operative ecchymosis on days 1 and 7, scar cosmesis at months 1 and 6, and patient satisfaction at 6 months, the scores were similar between the groups. Conclusion: The clinical difference between needle-tipped electrocautery and cold scalpel incision was not observed after upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Needle-tipped electrocautery should be used conveniently and reliably for skin incisions in upper eyelid blepharoplasty for good cosmetic results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Eye Research\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2023.28291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2023.28291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较针刺式电灼切口和冷刀切口在上睑成形术中的术后效果和患者-外科医生满意度。方法:回顾性分析247例双侧上睑成形术患者的资料。接受上睑成形术、上睑下垂手术或脂肪垫去除的患者被排除在外。患者分为2组,1组为针尖电切切口,2组为冷手术刀切口。观察患者术前皮肤类型、围术期出血情况及手术时间。观察术后第1、7天淤血情况及第1、6个月疤痕修复情况。患者在6个月时被问及满意度。结果:共纳入155例患者,其中组1 75例,组2 80例。两组在年龄、性别和皮肤类型上没有统计学差异。无严重并发症记录。在外科医生满意度方面,第一组手术时间和出血量均显著低于对照组。术后第1、7天瘀斑、第1、6个月疤痕修复、6个月患者满意度评分,两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论:上睑成形术后,针刺式电灼与冷刀式切口无临床差异。在上睑睑成形术中,为获得良好的美容效果,应方便、可靠地使用针尖电切术治疗皮肤切口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of post-operative outcomes and patient-surgeon satisfaction with a needle-tipped electrocautery incision and a cold scalpel incision in upper eyelid blepharoplasty: Cohort study
Purpose: The objective of the study is to compare post-operative outcomes and patient-surgeon satisfaction between a needle-tipped electrocautery incision and a cold scalpel incision in upper eyelid blepharoplasty Methods: The data from 247 patients who underwent bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent upper eyelid blepharoplasty with ptosis surgery or fat pad removal were excluded. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group 1 - needle-tipped electrocautery incision and Group 2 - a cold scalpel incision. Pre-operative skin types of the patients, perioperative hemorrhage, and surgical time were observed. Post-operative ecchymosis on days 1 and 7 and scar cosmesis at months 1 and 6 were evaluated. Patients were asked about the level of satisfaction at 6 months. Results: One hundred and fifty-five patients, 75 patients in Group 1 and 80 patients in Group 2, were included in the study. No statistical differences were detected between the two groups for age, sex, and skin type. No serious complications were recorded. For surgeon satisfaction, surgical time and hemorrhage amount were statistically significantly lower in Group 1. Post-operative ecchymosis on days 1 and 7, scar cosmesis at months 1 and 6, and patient satisfaction at 6 months, the scores were similar between the groups. Conclusion: The clinical difference between needle-tipped electrocautery and cold scalpel incision was not observed after upper eyelid blepharoplasty. Needle-tipped electrocautery should be used conveniently and reliably for skin incisions in upper eyelid blepharoplasty for good cosmetic results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信