b谷歌课堂:定义其作为学习管理系统的角色

Kurt S Candilas, Melody R. Agcito, Kurt C., Casas, Stephen Cubar
{"title":"b谷歌课堂:定义其作为学习管理系统的角色","authors":"Kurt S Candilas, Melody R. Agcito, Kurt C., Casas, Stephen Cubar","doi":"10.37745/bjmas.2022.0278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Google Classroom (GC) is a platform used by schools to continue their delivery of instructional processes during the pandemic. This study identified the extent of students' and teachers' utilization of GC's features, their assessment as a learning management system, and their experiences using the platform. Concurrent-nested mixed method was employed. Purposive criterion and random sampling were used for the selection of the participants. Findings revealed significant difference in communication and task management in the features of GC. Ease of access, perceived usefulness, communication and interaction, and perceived instruction delivery demonstrated significant difference. This implies the beneficial use of GC for participants in achieving better results in their heutagogical practices in learning and teaching. Two themes emerged from their experiences of GC. Digital interdependence specifically classifies their experiences as adeptness and ease, effectiveness and efficiency, and engagement, while discomfort, lack of resources, connectivity, and academic honesty are their experiences of technological vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":421703,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Google Classroom: Defining its Role as Learning Management System\",\"authors\":\"Kurt S Candilas, Melody R. Agcito, Kurt C., Casas, Stephen Cubar\",\"doi\":\"10.37745/bjmas.2022.0278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Google Classroom (GC) is a platform used by schools to continue their delivery of instructional processes during the pandemic. This study identified the extent of students' and teachers' utilization of GC's features, their assessment as a learning management system, and their experiences using the platform. Concurrent-nested mixed method was employed. Purposive criterion and random sampling were used for the selection of the participants. Findings revealed significant difference in communication and task management in the features of GC. Ease of access, perceived usefulness, communication and interaction, and perceived instruction delivery demonstrated significant difference. This implies the beneficial use of GC for participants in achieving better results in their heutagogical practices in learning and teaching. Two themes emerged from their experiences of GC. Digital interdependence specifically classifies their experiences as adeptness and ease, effectiveness and efficiency, and engagement, while discomfort, lack of resources, connectivity, and academic honesty are their experiences of technological vulnerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谷歌课堂(GC)是学校在疫情期间继续提供教学过程的一个平台。本研究确定了学生和教师对GC功能的利用程度,他们作为学习管理系统的评估,以及他们使用平台的体验。采用并行嵌套混合方法。研究对象的选择采用目的性标准和随机抽样法。结果显示,GC的特征在沟通和任务管理方面存在显著差异。易得性、感知有用性、沟通与互动、感知教学传递存在显著差异。这意味着GC对参与者在学习和教学的神学实践中取得更好的结果是有益的。从他们的GC经历中产生了两个主题。数字相互依赖将他们的体验具体分为熟练和轻松、有效性和效率以及参与,而不适、缺乏资源、连通性和学术诚实则是他们对技术脆弱性的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Google Classroom: Defining its Role as Learning Management System
Google Classroom (GC) is a platform used by schools to continue their delivery of instructional processes during the pandemic. This study identified the extent of students' and teachers' utilization of GC's features, their assessment as a learning management system, and their experiences using the platform. Concurrent-nested mixed method was employed. Purposive criterion and random sampling were used for the selection of the participants. Findings revealed significant difference in communication and task management in the features of GC. Ease of access, perceived usefulness, communication and interaction, and perceived instruction delivery demonstrated significant difference. This implies the beneficial use of GC for participants in achieving better results in their heutagogical practices in learning and teaching. Two themes emerged from their experiences of GC. Digital interdependence specifically classifies their experiences as adeptness and ease, effectiveness and efficiency, and engagement, while discomfort, lack of resources, connectivity, and academic honesty are their experiences of technological vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信