亚马逊虚假评论者检测:大量用户的影响

Youssef Esseddiq Ouatiti, Noureddine Kerzazi
{"title":"亚马逊虚假评论者检测:大量用户的影响","authors":"Youssef Esseddiq Ouatiti, Noureddine Kerzazi","doi":"10.1145/3419604.3419800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online marketplaces such as Amazon allow people to share their experiences about purchased products using textual comments known as product reviews. These reviews have become a common tool that users rely on to get insights on the quality and functionality of products and services from online consumers. However, like any other online information, reviewers raise serious questions concerning the credibility and reliability, since anyone can post reviews, which might impact the reliability of the information. This paper tackles the phenomenon of Bulk reviewers. We first analyze a large dataset of reviews from Amazon aiming to spot bulk reviewers according to their behavior. We then apply a what-if analysis to assess the effect of bulk reviews on the online marketplaces using a metric called Net Promoter Score to measure the willingness of users to recommend products. Our Results reveal that bulk users (i.e., users that review multiple times) have same distribution of ratings as non-bulk users indicating that a bulk reviewer is not automatically a fake reviewer. Yet, we discover that bulk users do inflate NPS metric and thus contribute to overestimate the level of customer satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":250715,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Amazon Fake Reviewers Detection: The Effect of Bulk Users\",\"authors\":\"Youssef Esseddiq Ouatiti, Noureddine Kerzazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3419604.3419800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Online marketplaces such as Amazon allow people to share their experiences about purchased products using textual comments known as product reviews. These reviews have become a common tool that users rely on to get insights on the quality and functionality of products and services from online consumers. However, like any other online information, reviewers raise serious questions concerning the credibility and reliability, since anyone can post reviews, which might impact the reliability of the information. This paper tackles the phenomenon of Bulk reviewers. We first analyze a large dataset of reviews from Amazon aiming to spot bulk reviewers according to their behavior. We then apply a what-if analysis to assess the effect of bulk reviews on the online marketplaces using a metric called Net Promoter Score to measure the willingness of users to recommend products. Our Results reveal that bulk users (i.e., users that review multiple times) have same distribution of ratings as non-bulk users indicating that a bulk reviewer is not automatically a fake reviewer. Yet, we discover that bulk users do inflate NPS metric and thus contribute to overestimate the level of customer satisfaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419604.3419800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Systems: Theories and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3419604.3419800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

像亚马逊这样的在线市场允许人们使用被称为产品评论的文本评论来分享他们对购买产品的体验。这些评论已经成为用户从在线消费者那里了解产品和服务的质量和功能的常用工具。然而,像任何其他在线信息一样,评论者提出了关于可信度和可靠性的严重问题,因为任何人都可以发表评论,这可能会影响信息的可靠性。本文解决了批量审稿人现象。我们首先分析了来自亚马逊的大量评论数据集,目的是根据他们的行为发现大量的评论者。然后,我们应用假设分析来评估在线市场上大量评论的影响,使用一个称为净推荐值的指标来衡量用户推荐产品的意愿。我们的结果显示,批量用户(即多次评论的用户)与非批量用户具有相同的评分分布,这表明批量评论者不会自动成为虚假评论者。然而,我们发现大量用户确实夸大了NPS指标,从而导致高估了客户满意度水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Amazon Fake Reviewers Detection: The Effect of Bulk Users
Online marketplaces such as Amazon allow people to share their experiences about purchased products using textual comments known as product reviews. These reviews have become a common tool that users rely on to get insights on the quality and functionality of products and services from online consumers. However, like any other online information, reviewers raise serious questions concerning the credibility and reliability, since anyone can post reviews, which might impact the reliability of the information. This paper tackles the phenomenon of Bulk reviewers. We first analyze a large dataset of reviews from Amazon aiming to spot bulk reviewers according to their behavior. We then apply a what-if analysis to assess the effect of bulk reviews on the online marketplaces using a metric called Net Promoter Score to measure the willingness of users to recommend products. Our Results reveal that bulk users (i.e., users that review multiple times) have same distribution of ratings as non-bulk users indicating that a bulk reviewer is not automatically a fake reviewer. Yet, we discover that bulk users do inflate NPS metric and thus contribute to overestimate the level of customer satisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信