{"title":"估算劳动力市场摩擦中的贸易收益","authors":"Germán Pupato, Benjamin M. Sand, J. Tschopp","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3357662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a theory and an empirical strategy to estimate the welfare gains from trade in economies with frictional local labor markets. We obtain a welfare formula that nests previous results and features an additional adjustment margin, via the employment rate. To obtain causal estimates of two key parameters, the trade elasticity and the elasticity of substitution in consumption, we propose a theoretically-consistent identification strategy that exploits variation in industrial composition across local labor markets. We examine Germany's recent trade integration with China and Eastern Europe. Under monopolistic competition with free entry and firm heterogeneity, the welfare gains are 6\\% larger than in the frictionless setting. The relative welfare gains are more modest under alternative market structures.","PeriodicalId":391101,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: International Economics eJournal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the Gains From Trade in Frictional Labor Markets\",\"authors\":\"Germán Pupato, Benjamin M. Sand, J. Tschopp\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3357662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We develop a theory and an empirical strategy to estimate the welfare gains from trade in economies with frictional local labor markets. We obtain a welfare formula that nests previous results and features an additional adjustment margin, via the employment rate. To obtain causal estimates of two key parameters, the trade elasticity and the elasticity of substitution in consumption, we propose a theoretically-consistent identification strategy that exploits variation in industrial composition across local labor markets. We examine Germany's recent trade integration with China and Eastern Europe. Under monopolistic competition with free entry and firm heterogeneity, the welfare gains are 6\\\\% larger than in the frictionless setting. The relative welfare gains are more modest under alternative market structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: International Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: International Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: International Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating the Gains From Trade in Frictional Labor Markets
We develop a theory and an empirical strategy to estimate the welfare gains from trade in economies with frictional local labor markets. We obtain a welfare formula that nests previous results and features an additional adjustment margin, via the employment rate. To obtain causal estimates of two key parameters, the trade elasticity and the elasticity of substitution in consumption, we propose a theoretically-consistent identification strategy that exploits variation in industrial composition across local labor markets. We examine Germany's recent trade integration with China and Eastern Europe. Under monopolistic competition with free entry and firm heterogeneity, the welfare gains are 6\% larger than in the frictionless setting. The relative welfare gains are more modest under alternative market structures.