{"title":"DAPATKAH FINANCIAL LITERACY BERFUNGSI SEBAGAI MEDIASI YANG BAIK UNTUK FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENENTU FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DECISION","authors":"Ignatius Roni Setyawan, Margarita Ekadjaja, Alwina Salim","doi":"10.24912/jmieb.v6i1.16187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan memberikan jawaban terhadap kontradiksi dalam hasil penelitian sebelumnya, serta memberikan sudut pandang baru dengan membagi kelompok usia responden di bawah dan di atas 40 tahun. Pembedaan ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan bagaimana faktor usia berhubungan dengan tingkat kematangan berpikir dan bertindak seseorang, baik dalam pembuatan keputusan sehari-hari maupun financial management decision. Hal baru yang ditawarkan penelitian ini adalah mencari bukti efektivitas financial literacy sebagai mediasi yang baik untuk faktor-faktor penentu financial management decision seperti financial knowledge dan financial inclusion. Jika financial literacy memang diyakini memiliki arti penting maka financial literacy dapat berperan sebagai mediator. Penelitian ini telah memberikan jawaban yang jelas akan terdukungnya 3 hipotesis alternatif melalui signifikansi path coefficient yang dapat dilihat pada hasil uji bootstrapping level direct effect (H1 dan H2). Secara khusus, H3 yang juga terdukung pada hasil uji bootstrapping level indirect effect sekaligus membuktikan peran financial literacy sebagai mediator yang baik untuk mengintervensi pengaruh financial inclusion dan financial knowledge terhadap financial management decision. Temuan paling menarik dalam hasil uji bootstrapping level indirect effect adalah efek mediasi financial literacy pada pengaruh financial knowledge terhadap financial management decision ternyata lebih kuat daripada efek mediasi financial literacy pada pengaruh financial inclusion terhadap financial management decision. Efektivitas financial literacy sebagai mediator yang baik dalam mengintervensi pengaruh financial inclusion dan financial knowledge terhadap financial management decision dapat direalisasikan melalui model SEM yang ada. This study intends to provide answers to the contradictions in previous studies’ results, as well as provide a new perspective by dividing the age groups of respondents below and above 40 years. This distinction aims to show how the age factor is related to the level of maturity of one's thinking and acting, both in making daily decisions and financial management decisions. The new contribution which this research offers is to look for evidence of the effectiveness of financial literacy as a good mediator for the determinants of financial management decisions such as financial knowledge and financial inclusion. If financial literacy is believed to have an important meaning, then financial literacy can act as a mediation. This study has provided a clear answer to support the 3 alternative hypotheses through the significance of the path coefficient which can be seen in the results of the bootstrapping level direct effect test (H1 and H2). Specifically, the H3 hypotheses which is also supported by the results of the bootstrapping level indirect effect test also proves the role of financial literacy as a good mediator to intervene in the influence of financial inclusion and financial knowledge on financial management decisions. The most interesting finding in the results of the indirect effect bootstrapping level test is that the mediating effect of financial literacy on the influence of financial knowledge on financial management decisions is stronger than the mediating effect of financial literacy on the influence of financial inclusion on financial management decisions. The effectiveness of financial literacy as a good mediator in intervening the influence of financial inclusion and financial knowledge on financial management decisions can be realized through the existing SEM model.","PeriodicalId":102855,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v6i1.16187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在为先前研究结果的矛盾提供答案,并通过将受访者的年龄分成40岁以下和40岁以上,为他们提供一个新的视角。这种区别的目的是指出年龄因素如何与一个人在日常决策和金融管理决策中的思想和行为水平有关。这项研究提供的新证据是,作为财务管理决策因素(如金融知识和金融包括)的有效调解,寻求有力的证据。如果金融文学被认为是有意义的,那么金融文学可以作为调解人。本研究提供了一个明确的答案,可以通过在直接效果水平试验(H1和H2)的显著位置支持3种替代假设。具体来说,H3也支持直接效应测试,证明了金融扫盲在干预金融管理决策方面的良好调解人作用。最引人注目的内部作用是,金融知识产权对金融管理决策影响的调解效应比金融知识管理决策影响更强。金融扫盲作为一个有效的调解人,干预金融管理决策的影响可以通过现有模式实现。这项研究旨在为今后40年左右的重大责任提供新的答案。这种混乱让我们知道,一个人思考和行动的成熟程度与时代是如何相关的,两人都在制造每日的决定和财务管理决定。这项研究的最新结果表明,金融知识管理的决定性决定是这样一项财务知识和财务包括的一个很好的调解人。如果金融文学认为有一个重要的意义,那么金融文学可以作为一种媒体行为。这项研究提供了一个明确的答案,以支持在可能预见的引导效果级别(H1和H2)的残留试验中所观察到的3种替代水盲。具体地说,由直接影响水平的金融著作推荐的H3假设也证明了金融著作的影响和金融知识决定的一个良好调解人。results》最有趣的找到》间接效应bootstrapping.net上水平测试的就是那把financial literacy mediating效应》《金融知识的影响在金融管理的决定是比《financial literacy mediating效应强on The financial inclusion在金融管理决定的影响。金融文学的有效调解人对金融管理决策的影响可以通过存在模式实现。
DAPATKAH FINANCIAL LITERACY BERFUNGSI SEBAGAI MEDIASI YANG BAIK UNTUK FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENENTU FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DECISION
Penelitian ini bertujuan memberikan jawaban terhadap kontradiksi dalam hasil penelitian sebelumnya, serta memberikan sudut pandang baru dengan membagi kelompok usia responden di bawah dan di atas 40 tahun. Pembedaan ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan bagaimana faktor usia berhubungan dengan tingkat kematangan berpikir dan bertindak seseorang, baik dalam pembuatan keputusan sehari-hari maupun financial management decision. Hal baru yang ditawarkan penelitian ini adalah mencari bukti efektivitas financial literacy sebagai mediasi yang baik untuk faktor-faktor penentu financial management decision seperti financial knowledge dan financial inclusion. Jika financial literacy memang diyakini memiliki arti penting maka financial literacy dapat berperan sebagai mediator. Penelitian ini telah memberikan jawaban yang jelas akan terdukungnya 3 hipotesis alternatif melalui signifikansi path coefficient yang dapat dilihat pada hasil uji bootstrapping level direct effect (H1 dan H2). Secara khusus, H3 yang juga terdukung pada hasil uji bootstrapping level indirect effect sekaligus membuktikan peran financial literacy sebagai mediator yang baik untuk mengintervensi pengaruh financial inclusion dan financial knowledge terhadap financial management decision. Temuan paling menarik dalam hasil uji bootstrapping level indirect effect adalah efek mediasi financial literacy pada pengaruh financial knowledge terhadap financial management decision ternyata lebih kuat daripada efek mediasi financial literacy pada pengaruh financial inclusion terhadap financial management decision. Efektivitas financial literacy sebagai mediator yang baik dalam mengintervensi pengaruh financial inclusion dan financial knowledge terhadap financial management decision dapat direalisasikan melalui model SEM yang ada. This study intends to provide answers to the contradictions in previous studies’ results, as well as provide a new perspective by dividing the age groups of respondents below and above 40 years. This distinction aims to show how the age factor is related to the level of maturity of one's thinking and acting, both in making daily decisions and financial management decisions. The new contribution which this research offers is to look for evidence of the effectiveness of financial literacy as a good mediator for the determinants of financial management decisions such as financial knowledge and financial inclusion. If financial literacy is believed to have an important meaning, then financial literacy can act as a mediation. This study has provided a clear answer to support the 3 alternative hypotheses through the significance of the path coefficient which can be seen in the results of the bootstrapping level direct effect test (H1 and H2). Specifically, the H3 hypotheses which is also supported by the results of the bootstrapping level indirect effect test also proves the role of financial literacy as a good mediator to intervene in the influence of financial inclusion and financial knowledge on financial management decisions. The most interesting finding in the results of the indirect effect bootstrapping level test is that the mediating effect of financial literacy on the influence of financial knowledge on financial management decisions is stronger than the mediating effect of financial literacy on the influence of financial inclusion on financial management decisions. The effectiveness of financial literacy as a good mediator in intervening the influence of financial inclusion and financial knowledge on financial management decisions can be realized through the existing SEM model.