评价标准本体模块化工具

Sunju Oh, H. Yeom
{"title":"评价标准本体模块化工具","authors":"Sunju Oh, H. Yeom","doi":"10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Semantic Web and ontology have received increased attention in recent years. Various tools on modularization have been developed. However, selecting an appropriate ontology to fit a given context is difficult because assumptions for the approaches vary greatly. Therefore, a method that can compare modularization tools and help screen the most suitable approach is highly desired. In this research, a new set of evaluation criteria for selecting appropriate ontology modularization tools is proposed. Three aspects of tool evaluation, namely, tool performance, data performance, and usability are presented. This study is an empirical analysis of a number of modularization tools. Experimental results indicate that the proposed evaluation criteria for ontology modularization tools are valid and effective. It provides an evaluation method for ontology modularization, enabling ontology engineers to compare different modularization tools and easily choose the appropriate approach to produce quality ontology modules.","PeriodicalId":128421,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation Criteria Ontology Modularization Tools\",\"authors\":\"Sunju Oh, H. Yeom\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Semantic Web and ontology have received increased attention in recent years. Various tools on modularization have been developed. However, selecting an appropriate ontology to fit a given context is difficult because assumptions for the approaches vary greatly. Therefore, a method that can compare modularization tools and help screen the most suitable approach is highly desired. In this research, a new set of evaluation criteria for selecting appropriate ontology modularization tools is proposed. Three aspects of tool evaluation, namely, tool performance, data performance, and usability are presented. This study is an empirical analysis of a number of modularization tools. Experimental results indicate that the proposed evaluation criteria for ontology modularization tools are valid and effective. It provides an evaluation method for ontology modularization, enabling ontology engineers to compare different modularization tools and easily choose the appropriate approach to produce quality ontology modules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2011.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

语义网和本体近年来受到越来越多的关注。已经开发了各种模块化工具。然而,选择一个合适的本体来适应给定的上下文是困难的,因为方法的假设差异很大。因此,非常需要一种能够比较模块化工具并帮助筛选最合适方法的方法。在本研究中,提出了一套新的评价标准来选择合适的本体模块化工具。提出了工具评价的三个方面,即工具性能、数据性能和可用性。本研究是对一些模块化工具的实证分析。实验结果表明,本文提出的本体模块化工具评价标准是有效的。它为本体模块化提供了一种评价方法,使本体工程师能够比较不同的模块化工具,方便地选择合适的方法来生产高质量的本体模块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation Criteria Ontology Modularization Tools
Semantic Web and ontology have received increased attention in recent years. Various tools on modularization have been developed. However, selecting an appropriate ontology to fit a given context is difficult because assumptions for the approaches vary greatly. Therefore, a method that can compare modularization tools and help screen the most suitable approach is highly desired. In this research, a new set of evaluation criteria for selecting appropriate ontology modularization tools is proposed. Three aspects of tool evaluation, namely, tool performance, data performance, and usability are presented. This study is an empirical analysis of a number of modularization tools. Experimental results indicate that the proposed evaluation criteria for ontology modularization tools are valid and effective. It provides an evaluation method for ontology modularization, enabling ontology engineers to compare different modularization tools and easily choose the appropriate approach to produce quality ontology modules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信