社会生态系统方法对于理解和应对COVID-19对人类和环境的复杂影响至关重要

A. Kadykalo, C. Beaudoin, Diana M. Hackenburg, N. Young, S. Cooke
{"title":"社会生态系统方法对于理解和应对COVID-19对人类和环境的复杂影响至关重要","authors":"A. Kadykalo, C. Beaudoin, Diana M. Hackenburg, N. Young, S. Cooke","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment\",\"authors\":\"A. Kadykalo, C. Beaudoin, Diana M. Hackenburg, N. Young, S. Cooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对密不可分的地球和人类社会系统产生了巨大影响。COVID-19等人畜共患疾病揭示了人类福祉与环境以及其他(人类驱动的)社会生态危机(如生物多样性的急剧丧失、土地利用变化和气候变化)是如何密不可分的。我们认为,COVID-19本身就是一场社会生态危机,但迄今为止的应对措施并未包括生态弹性,部分原因是“人类暂停”的比喻创造了一种不切实际的舒适感,为不作为提供借口。人类暂停的说法掩盖了这样一个事实,即在大流行期间资源开采仍在继续,而一切照旧的商业活动继续造成广泛的生态系统退化,需要立即采取政策予以关注。在某些情况下,新冠肺炎政策措施进一步加剧了这一问题,如减少环境税或监管执法。虽然一些社会生态系统(SES)的影响正在减少,但其他系统正在经历我们所说的“人类挤压”,即更多的游客和更密集的使用。从社会生态的角度可以更好地理解这种流行病的各种原因和影响。社会生态洞察力对于规划和建立应对大流行病和未来社会生态危机所需的复原力是必要的。如果我们作为一个社会认真地想要更好地从大流行中恢复过来,我们就必须接受一套基于社会经济地位思维的研究和政策对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social–ecological systems approaches are essential for understanding and responding to the complex impacts of COVID-19 on people and the environment
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is dramatically impacting planetary and human societal systems that are inseparably linked. Zoonotic diseases like COVID-19 expose how human well-being is inextricably interconnected with the environment and to other converging (human driven) social–ecological crises, such as the dramatic losses of biodiversity, land use change, and climate change. We argue that COVID-19 is itself a social–ecological crisis, but responses so far have not been inclusive of ecological resiliency, in part because the “Anthropause” metaphor has created an unrealistic sense of comfort that excuses inaction. Anthropause narratives belie the fact that resource extraction has continued during the pandemic and that business-as-usual continues to cause widespread ecosystem degradation that requires immediate policy attention. In some cases, COVID-19 policy measures further contributed to the problem such as reducing environmental taxes or regulatory enforcement. While some social–ecological systems (SES) are experiencing reduced impacts, others are experiencing what we term an “Anthrocrush,” with more visitors and intensified use. The varied causes and impacts of the pandemic can be better understood with a social–ecological lens. Social–ecological insights are necessary to plan and build the resilience needed to tackle the pandemic and future social–ecological crises. If we as a society are serious about building back better from the pandemic, we must embrace a set of research and policy responses informed by SES thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信