covid - 19诊断:胸部x线与血液检查数据的比较方法

A. Öztaş, Dorukhan Boncukçu, Ege Özteke, M. Demir, A. Mirici, P. Mutlu
{"title":"covid - 19诊断:胸部x线与血液检查数据的比较方法","authors":"A. Öztaş, Dorukhan Boncukçu, Ege Özteke, M. Demir, A. Mirici, P. Mutlu","doi":"10.1109/UBMK52708.2021.9558969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 virus has made a major impact on the world and is still spreading rapidly. A reliable solution to prevent further damage, early diagnosis of coronavirus patients are incredibly important. While chest X-Ray diagnosis is the easiest and fastest solution for this, an average radiologist has only a 75% to 85% accuracy when evaluating X-Ray data, thus it is desirable to achieve an accurate artificial network for this. Throughout this study, chest X-Ray data and blood routine test data are utilised and compared. X-Ray data consists of 5000 chest X-Ray images which are gathered from an open-source research and from a local hospital in which both have anonymous data. The blood test results were also taken from the same hospital. For the chest X-Ray diagnosis we utilised two of the popular convolutional neural networks, which are Resnet18 and Squeezenet and concluded that Resnet18 provided slightly more accurate results, while both having almost 98% accuracy. For blood test diagnosis, a feed-forward multi layer neural network was used. Even though it was worked on an insufficient dataset, 72% accuracy was obtained, thus making it a feasible option for further research. Hence, we concluded that in general chest X-Ray diagnosis is preferable over routine blood test diagnosis and the usage of AI yields better approximate results than humans.","PeriodicalId":106516,"journal":{"name":"2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covid19 Diagnosis: Comparative Approach Between Chest X-Ray and Blood Test Data\",\"authors\":\"A. Öztaş, Dorukhan Boncukçu, Ege Özteke, M. Demir, A. Mirici, P. Mutlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UBMK52708.2021.9558969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Covid-19 virus has made a major impact on the world and is still spreading rapidly. A reliable solution to prevent further damage, early diagnosis of coronavirus patients are incredibly important. While chest X-Ray diagnosis is the easiest and fastest solution for this, an average radiologist has only a 75% to 85% accuracy when evaluating X-Ray data, thus it is desirable to achieve an accurate artificial network for this. Throughout this study, chest X-Ray data and blood routine test data are utilised and compared. X-Ray data consists of 5000 chest X-Ray images which are gathered from an open-source research and from a local hospital in which both have anonymous data. The blood test results were also taken from the same hospital. For the chest X-Ray diagnosis we utilised two of the popular convolutional neural networks, which are Resnet18 and Squeezenet and concluded that Resnet18 provided slightly more accurate results, while both having almost 98% accuracy. For blood test diagnosis, a feed-forward multi layer neural network was used. Even though it was worked on an insufficient dataset, 72% accuracy was obtained, thus making it a feasible option for further research. Hence, we concluded that in general chest X-Ray diagnosis is preferable over routine blood test diagnosis and the usage of AI yields better approximate results than humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK52708.2021.9558969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK52708.2021.9558969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情对世界造成重大影响,疫情仍在迅速蔓延。作为防止进一步损害的可靠解决方案,对冠状病毒患者的早期诊断非常重要。虽然胸部x线诊断是最简单和最快的解决方案,但放射科医生在评估x线数据时的平均准确率只有75%到85%,因此需要为此实现准确的人工网络。在整个研究中,胸部x线资料和血常规检查资料被利用和比较。x射线数据由5000张胸部x射线图像组成,这些图像来自一项开源研究和一家当地医院,两者都有匿名数据。血液检查结果也来自同一家医院。对于胸部x射线诊断,我们使用了两种流行的卷积神经网络,即Resnet18和Squeezenet,并得出结论,Resnet18提供的结果略准确,而两者的准确率都接近98%。在血液检测诊断中,采用前馈多层神经网络。尽管在一个不充分的数据集上工作,但获得了72%的准确率,从而使其成为进一步研究的可行选择。因此,我们得出结论,一般情况下,胸部x线诊断优于常规血液检查诊断,人工智能的使用比人类产生更好的近似结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Covid19 Diagnosis: Comparative Approach Between Chest X-Ray and Blood Test Data
The Covid-19 virus has made a major impact on the world and is still spreading rapidly. A reliable solution to prevent further damage, early diagnosis of coronavirus patients are incredibly important. While chest X-Ray diagnosis is the easiest and fastest solution for this, an average radiologist has only a 75% to 85% accuracy when evaluating X-Ray data, thus it is desirable to achieve an accurate artificial network for this. Throughout this study, chest X-Ray data and blood routine test data are utilised and compared. X-Ray data consists of 5000 chest X-Ray images which are gathered from an open-source research and from a local hospital in which both have anonymous data. The blood test results were also taken from the same hospital. For the chest X-Ray diagnosis we utilised two of the popular convolutional neural networks, which are Resnet18 and Squeezenet and concluded that Resnet18 provided slightly more accurate results, while both having almost 98% accuracy. For blood test diagnosis, a feed-forward multi layer neural network was used. Even though it was worked on an insufficient dataset, 72% accuracy was obtained, thus making it a feasible option for further research. Hence, we concluded that in general chest X-Ray diagnosis is preferable over routine blood test diagnosis and the usage of AI yields better approximate results than humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信