在El Manial大学医院接受咨询的妇女剖宫产后阴道分娩的发生率和结果

Samara Mohamed, Yousria A. Elsayed, G. Ghonemy, Marwa Sharaf
{"title":"在El Manial大学医院接受咨询的妇女剖宫产后阴道分娩的发生率和结果","authors":"Samara Mohamed, Yousria A. Elsayed, G. Ghonemy, Marwa Sharaf","doi":"10.4103/enj.enj_35_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Repeated cesarean section (CS) is the most significant factor contributing to overall increased CS rates. The primary indicator of repeated CS is a prior CS. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is a trial to reduce CS rates. Aim The aim of study was to examine the effect of counseling on the incidence, maternal, and neonatal outcomes of VBAC. Design A quasi-experimental one-group posttest-only design was adopted for this study. Setting The study was conducted at the Outpatient Clinic and Casualty Department at Manial University Hospital affiliated to Cairo University. Sample A purposive sample of pregnant women was recruited through a period of 6 months from July to December 2019 based on certain criteria; the most important one is to have a previous CS. Tool A structured interviewing tool, labor progress record (Partograph), and neonatal Apgar score were used to collect the data. Results A total of 90 participants were enrolled into study. A total of 79 (87.8%) women agreed to have VBAC after counseling compared with only 11 (12.2%), who refused to have VBAC and chose CS. The trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) rate was 40.5%. The rate of VBAC was 31.6%. Success rate of TOLAC was 78.1%, whereas failed TOLAC was 21.9% owing to lack of labor progress and fetal distress. Overall, 68.4% had CSs lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Among them, 37% had elective LSCS and 63% had emergency LSCS. Physician decision without any medical indication for CS was the most common indications of elective repeat CS, with a rate of 85%. Oligohydramnios was the most common cause for emergency CS delivery, with a rate of 44.5%. All women who delivered VBAC had normal progress of labor and their babies had normal Apgar score (8–10). No cases that underwent VBAC had any morbidity or mortality. Conclusion Counseling is needed for the selection of VBAC as a mode of delivery. Successful VBAC is associated with better fetomaternal and neonatal outcomes, so most women with one previous cesarean delivery with a low-transverse incision should be counseled and encouraged to undergo a trial of labor in her recurrent pregnancy. Recommendations A qualitative research study should be conducted to assess the satisfaction of women from VBAC and compare it with CS.","PeriodicalId":149497,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Nursing Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean among women receiving counseling at El Manial University Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Samara Mohamed, Yousria A. Elsayed, G. Ghonemy, Marwa Sharaf\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/enj.enj_35_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Repeated cesarean section (CS) is the most significant factor contributing to overall increased CS rates. The primary indicator of repeated CS is a prior CS. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is a trial to reduce CS rates. Aim The aim of study was to examine the effect of counseling on the incidence, maternal, and neonatal outcomes of VBAC. Design A quasi-experimental one-group posttest-only design was adopted for this study. Setting The study was conducted at the Outpatient Clinic and Casualty Department at Manial University Hospital affiliated to Cairo University. Sample A purposive sample of pregnant women was recruited through a period of 6 months from July to December 2019 based on certain criteria; the most important one is to have a previous CS. Tool A structured interviewing tool, labor progress record (Partograph), and neonatal Apgar score were used to collect the data. Results A total of 90 participants were enrolled into study. A total of 79 (87.8%) women agreed to have VBAC after counseling compared with only 11 (12.2%), who refused to have VBAC and chose CS. The trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) rate was 40.5%. The rate of VBAC was 31.6%. Success rate of TOLAC was 78.1%, whereas failed TOLAC was 21.9% owing to lack of labor progress and fetal distress. Overall, 68.4% had CSs lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Among them, 37% had elective LSCS and 63% had emergency LSCS. Physician decision without any medical indication for CS was the most common indications of elective repeat CS, with a rate of 85%. Oligohydramnios was the most common cause for emergency CS delivery, with a rate of 44.5%. All women who delivered VBAC had normal progress of labor and their babies had normal Apgar score (8–10). No cases that underwent VBAC had any morbidity or mortality. Conclusion Counseling is needed for the selection of VBAC as a mode of delivery. Successful VBAC is associated with better fetomaternal and neonatal outcomes, so most women with one previous cesarean delivery with a low-transverse incision should be counseled and encouraged to undergo a trial of labor in her recurrent pregnancy. Recommendations A qualitative research study should be conducted to assess the satisfaction of women from VBAC and compare it with CS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/enj.enj_35_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/enj.enj_35_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:重复剖宫产(CS)是导致剖宫产总发生率升高的最重要因素。重复CS的主要指标是既往CS。剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)是一项降低CS发生率的试验。目的本研究的目的是探讨咨询对VBAC的发生率、产妇和新生儿结局的影响。设计本研究采用准实验单组后验设计。本研究在开罗大学附属马尼亚大学医院门诊部和伤亡部进行。根据一定的标准,在2019年7月至12月的6个月内,有目的地招募孕妇样本;最重要的一点是要有前科。工具采用结构化访谈工具、产程记录(Partograph)和新生儿Apgar评分收集数据。结果共纳入90例受试者。79名(87.8%)女性在咨询后同意接受VBAC,而拒绝接受VBAC并选择CS的女性只有11名(12.2%)。剖宫产后试产率(TOLAC)为40.5%。VBAC发生率为31.6%。TOLAC的成功率为78.1%,而由于产程不足和胎儿窘迫导致的TOLAC失败率为21.9%。总体而言,68.4%的患者有CSs下段剖宫产(LSCS)。其中37%为选择性LSCS, 63%为紧急LSCS。医师决定无任何医学指征的CS是选择性重复CS最常见的指征,发生率为85%。羊水过少是紧急CS分娩最常见的原因,发生率为44.5%。所有分娩VBAC的妇女都有正常的分娩过程,她们的婴儿有正常的Apgar评分(8-10)。没有病例接受VBAC有任何发病率或死亡率。结论在选择VBAC作为分娩方式时需要进行咨询。成功的VBAC与更好的胎母和新生儿结局相关,因此大多数以前有过一次低横向切口剖宫产的妇女应该被建议并鼓励在她再次怀孕时进行分娩试验。建议应进行定性研究,评估VBAC妇女的满意度,并将其与CS进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence and outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean among women receiving counseling at El Manial University Hospital
Background Repeated cesarean section (CS) is the most significant factor contributing to overall increased CS rates. The primary indicator of repeated CS is a prior CS. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is a trial to reduce CS rates. Aim The aim of study was to examine the effect of counseling on the incidence, maternal, and neonatal outcomes of VBAC. Design A quasi-experimental one-group posttest-only design was adopted for this study. Setting The study was conducted at the Outpatient Clinic and Casualty Department at Manial University Hospital affiliated to Cairo University. Sample A purposive sample of pregnant women was recruited through a period of 6 months from July to December 2019 based on certain criteria; the most important one is to have a previous CS. Tool A structured interviewing tool, labor progress record (Partograph), and neonatal Apgar score were used to collect the data. Results A total of 90 participants were enrolled into study. A total of 79 (87.8%) women agreed to have VBAC after counseling compared with only 11 (12.2%), who refused to have VBAC and chose CS. The trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) rate was 40.5%. The rate of VBAC was 31.6%. Success rate of TOLAC was 78.1%, whereas failed TOLAC was 21.9% owing to lack of labor progress and fetal distress. Overall, 68.4% had CSs lower segment cesarean section (LSCS). Among them, 37% had elective LSCS and 63% had emergency LSCS. Physician decision without any medical indication for CS was the most common indications of elective repeat CS, with a rate of 85%. Oligohydramnios was the most common cause for emergency CS delivery, with a rate of 44.5%. All women who delivered VBAC had normal progress of labor and their babies had normal Apgar score (8–10). No cases that underwent VBAC had any morbidity or mortality. Conclusion Counseling is needed for the selection of VBAC as a mode of delivery. Successful VBAC is associated with better fetomaternal and neonatal outcomes, so most women with one previous cesarean delivery with a low-transverse incision should be counseled and encouraged to undergo a trial of labor in her recurrent pregnancy. Recommendations A qualitative research study should be conducted to assess the satisfaction of women from VBAC and compare it with CS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信