{"title":"“对我来说,识字就是权力”:在学科素养教师教育课程中阅读书籍长度的小说和非小说文本","authors":"M. Neville, R. Marlatt","doi":"10.1108/etpc-11-2021-0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to examine the reading of a book-length fiction or non-fiction text in one disciplinary literacy (DL) teacher education course. This paper considers how the assignment may help pre- and in-service teachers understand literacy as multifaceted and connected within and beyond their content areas (Moje, 2015). The research explores how reading a book-length text may help support DL, equity-oriented curricula that consider literacy as empowerment and connected to lived and communal experiences (González et al., 2005; Muhammad, 2020).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis work is grounded in a qualitative, humanizing methodology and thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006; Paris and Winn, 2014). This approach examines student work in one DL course, considering how teachers within and beyond English language arts (ELA) respond to the task of reading a book-length text.\n\n\nFindings\nFirst, the assignment offered space for participants to redefine literacy as empowerment and enjoyment. Second, the assignment helped participants connect literacy within and beyond their content areas and to see literacy as active and interdisciplinary. Third, the assignment includes clear limitations for a DL approach, particularly when participants focus mainly on connections to their content area. This sometimes obfuscated participants’ enjoyment of reading.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study offers a new perspective on a task that is often seen as specifically “ELA”: reading a book-length text. This project offers space for ELA educators to consider literacy from a DL, equity-oriented framework focused on enjoyment in literature within and beyond ELA classrooms.\n","PeriodicalId":428767,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Literacy to me is about power”: reading book-length fiction and non-fiction texts in a disciplinary literacy teacher education course\",\"authors\":\"M. Neville, R. Marlatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/etpc-11-2021-0146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to examine the reading of a book-length fiction or non-fiction text in one disciplinary literacy (DL) teacher education course. This paper considers how the assignment may help pre- and in-service teachers understand literacy as multifaceted and connected within and beyond their content areas (Moje, 2015). The research explores how reading a book-length text may help support DL, equity-oriented curricula that consider literacy as empowerment and connected to lived and communal experiences (González et al., 2005; Muhammad, 2020).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis work is grounded in a qualitative, humanizing methodology and thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006; Paris and Winn, 2014). This approach examines student work in one DL course, considering how teachers within and beyond English language arts (ELA) respond to the task of reading a book-length text.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFirst, the assignment offered space for participants to redefine literacy as empowerment and enjoyment. Second, the assignment helped participants connect literacy within and beyond their content areas and to see literacy as active and interdisciplinary. Third, the assignment includes clear limitations for a DL approach, particularly when participants focus mainly on connections to their content area. This sometimes obfuscated participants’ enjoyment of reading.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study offers a new perspective on a task that is often seen as specifically “ELA”: reading a book-length text. This project offers space for ELA educators to consider literacy from a DL, equity-oriented framework focused on enjoyment in literature within and beyond ELA classrooms.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":428767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Teaching: Practice & Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2021-0146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-11-2021-0146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:本研究旨在探讨一门学科素养(DL)教师教育课程中长篇小说或非小说文本的阅读情况。本文考虑了该作业如何帮助职前和在职教师理解读写能力是多方面的,并在其内容领域内外相互联系(Moje, 2015)。该研究探讨了阅读一本书长度的文本如何有助于支持DL,以公平为导向的课程,这些课程将扫盲视为赋权,并与生活和社区经验联系在一起(González等人,2005;默罕默德,2020)。设计/方法/方法这项工作是基于定性的、人性化的方法和主题分析方法(Braun和Clarke, 2006;Paris and Winn, 2014)。这种方法考察学生在DL课程中的作业,考虑英语语言艺术(ELA)内外的教师如何应对阅读一本书长度的文本的任务。首先,这项任务为参与者提供了将识字重新定义为赋权和享受的空间。其次,这项任务帮助参与者将读写能力与他们的内容领域内外联系起来,并将读写能力视为积极的、跨学科的。第三,作业包括DL方法的明确限制,特别是当参与者主要关注与其内容区域的连接时。这有时会影响参与者的阅读乐趣。独创性/价值这项研究提供了一种新的视角来看待一项通常被视为特别“ELA”的任务:阅读一本书长度的文本。该项目为ELA教育者提供了空间,让他们从DL、以公平为导向的框架出发,关注ELA课堂内外的文学享受。
“Literacy to me is about power”: reading book-length fiction and non-fiction texts in a disciplinary literacy teacher education course
Purpose
This paper aims to examine the reading of a book-length fiction or non-fiction text in one disciplinary literacy (DL) teacher education course. This paper considers how the assignment may help pre- and in-service teachers understand literacy as multifaceted and connected within and beyond their content areas (Moje, 2015). The research explores how reading a book-length text may help support DL, equity-oriented curricula that consider literacy as empowerment and connected to lived and communal experiences (González et al., 2005; Muhammad, 2020).
Design/methodology/approach
This work is grounded in a qualitative, humanizing methodology and thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006; Paris and Winn, 2014). This approach examines student work in one DL course, considering how teachers within and beyond English language arts (ELA) respond to the task of reading a book-length text.
Findings
First, the assignment offered space for participants to redefine literacy as empowerment and enjoyment. Second, the assignment helped participants connect literacy within and beyond their content areas and to see literacy as active and interdisciplinary. Third, the assignment includes clear limitations for a DL approach, particularly when participants focus mainly on connections to their content area. This sometimes obfuscated participants’ enjoyment of reading.
Originality/value
The study offers a new perspective on a task that is often seen as specifically “ELA”: reading a book-length text. This project offers space for ELA educators to consider literacy from a DL, equity-oriented framework focused on enjoyment in literature within and beyond ELA classrooms.