{"title":"互动对学生学习成绩的影响:以沙特公立大学为例","authors":"Ahmed Omer Ahmed Ismail, A. Mahmood","doi":"10.1109/ICCOINS.2018.8510577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the influence of interactions on students’ academic performance (SAP) in blended and traditional learning delivery. Its objective is to determine the effect of the three types of interactions on SAP in Saudi Public University. The method used was a survey study with a total sample size of 216 participants of experimental group and control group. The results have shown that the influence of interactions on SAP is significant. The predictors of interaction processes were contributed in improving SAP by explained variance of (BL=37% to TL=41%), (BL=83% to TL=66%) and (BL=53% to TL=41%) of student, instructor, and content interactions in blended learning compared to traditional learning respectively.","PeriodicalId":168165,"journal":{"name":"2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Interaction on Students Academic Performance: Case of Saudi Public University\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Omer Ahmed Ismail, A. Mahmood\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCOINS.2018.8510577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on the influence of interactions on students’ academic performance (SAP) in blended and traditional learning delivery. Its objective is to determine the effect of the three types of interactions on SAP in Saudi Public University. The method used was a survey study with a total sample size of 216 participants of experimental group and control group. The results have shown that the influence of interactions on SAP is significant. The predictors of interaction processes were contributed in improving SAP by explained variance of (BL=37% to TL=41%), (BL=83% to TL=66%) and (BL=53% to TL=41%) of student, instructor, and content interactions in blended learning compared to traditional learning respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCOINS.2018.8510577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCOINS.2018.8510577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Influence of Interaction on Students Academic Performance: Case of Saudi Public University
This paper focuses on the influence of interactions on students’ academic performance (SAP) in blended and traditional learning delivery. Its objective is to determine the effect of the three types of interactions on SAP in Saudi Public University. The method used was a survey study with a total sample size of 216 participants of experimental group and control group. The results have shown that the influence of interactions on SAP is significant. The predictors of interaction processes were contributed in improving SAP by explained variance of (BL=37% to TL=41%), (BL=83% to TL=66%) and (BL=53% to TL=41%) of student, instructor, and content interactions in blended learning compared to traditional learning respectively.