匿名反馈:实时反馈捕捉学生在学习过程中的参与

A. Shaheen, F. Azam, Khurram Irshad
{"title":"匿名反馈:实时反馈捕捉学生在学习过程中的参与","authors":"A. Shaheen, F. Azam, Khurram Irshad","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ evaluation plays a crucial role in strengthening the learning process and curriculum delivery. In some situations, because of the complicated structure of the feedback proformas or the fear of being identified students might not be able to express themselves honestly. Unstructured and anonymous feedback might help resolve the apprehensions and reluctance of students to give true feedback. We conducted a study to compare quantitative and qualitative data obtained through an anonymous and standardized official evaluation system. One hundred and ten medical students of Year III of Shifa College of Medicine participated in our study during an integrated module. We created an anonymous portal on the website www.freesuggestionbox.com and provided its link to the students. We encouraged students to reflect on their learning process throughout the module and provide quantitative feedback on the anonymous portal at the end of the module. Students also provided structured feedback on a standardized official evaluation questionnaire utilizing a 21-items questionnaire and optional comments as per routine for each faculty member. Quantitative and qualitative data of unstructured and anonymous feedback were analyzed and compared with the feedback provided on the official structures feedback proformas. Broad themes after being assessed by authors were assigned codes, commonalities in both feedbacks were analyzed and any new areas highlighted by students were identified. Quantitative data obtained through each feedback was statistically similar. Students provided more information about new learning strategies incorporated in the module on the anonymous portal in comparison to the official structured feedback portal. The total number of comments on the anonymous feedback portal was much higher than the official feedback portal. Anonymous and real-time feedback may influence the way the message is received and processed and may allow faculty to immediately resolve highlighted problems, ensure active participation and reduce insecurities of medical students.","PeriodicalId":239200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anonymous Feedback: A Real-time Feedback to Capture Students’ Engagement in Learning Process\",\"authors\":\"A. Shaheen, F. Azam, Khurram Irshad\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/assehr.k.210930.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teachers’ evaluation plays a crucial role in strengthening the learning process and curriculum delivery. In some situations, because of the complicated structure of the feedback proformas or the fear of being identified students might not be able to express themselves honestly. Unstructured and anonymous feedback might help resolve the apprehensions and reluctance of students to give true feedback. We conducted a study to compare quantitative and qualitative data obtained through an anonymous and standardized official evaluation system. One hundred and ten medical students of Year III of Shifa College of Medicine participated in our study during an integrated module. We created an anonymous portal on the website www.freesuggestionbox.com and provided its link to the students. We encouraged students to reflect on their learning process throughout the module and provide quantitative feedback on the anonymous portal at the end of the module. Students also provided structured feedback on a standardized official evaluation questionnaire utilizing a 21-items questionnaire and optional comments as per routine for each faculty member. Quantitative and qualitative data of unstructured and anonymous feedback were analyzed and compared with the feedback provided on the official structures feedback proformas. Broad themes after being assessed by authors were assigned codes, commonalities in both feedbacks were analyzed and any new areas highlighted by students were identified. Quantitative data obtained through each feedback was statistically similar. Students provided more information about new learning strategies incorporated in the module on the anonymous portal in comparison to the official structured feedback portal. The total number of comments on the anonymous feedback portal was much higher than the official feedback portal. Anonymous and real-time feedback may influence the way the message is received and processed and may allow faculty to immediately resolve highlighted problems, ensure active participation and reduce insecurities of medical students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education (ICME 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210930.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教师评价在加强学习过程和课程交付方面起着至关重要的作用。在某些情况下,由于反馈形式的复杂结构或害怕被认出,学生可能无法诚实地表达自己。非结构化和匿名的反馈可能有助于解决学生的担忧和不愿意给出真实的反馈。我们进行了一项研究,比较了通过匿名和标准化的官方评估系统获得的定量和定性数据。在一个集成模块中,有110名师法医学院三年级的医学生参与了我们的研究。我们在www.freesuggestionbox.com网站上创建了一个匿名门户,并将其链接提供给学生。我们鼓励学生在整个模块中反思他们的学习过程,并在模块结束时在匿名门户网站上提供定量反馈。学生们还在标准化的官方评估问卷上提供结构化的反馈,该问卷采用21项问卷,并根据每位教师的日常情况提供可选的评论。对非结构化和匿名反馈的定量和定性数据进行分析,并与官方结构反馈形式提供的反馈进行比较。作者评估后的广泛主题被分配代码,分析两种反馈中的共性,并确定学生强调的任何新领域。通过每次反馈得到的定量数据在统计学上相似。与正式的结构化反馈门户网站相比,学生们在匿名门户网站上提供了更多关于模块中包含的新学习策略的信息。匿名反馈门户上的评论总数远远高于官方反馈门户。匿名和实时反馈可能会影响信息的接收和处理方式,并可能使教师能够立即解决突出问题,确保积极参与并减少医学生的不安全感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anonymous Feedback: A Real-time Feedback to Capture Students’ Engagement in Learning Process
Teachers’ evaluation plays a crucial role in strengthening the learning process and curriculum delivery. In some situations, because of the complicated structure of the feedback proformas or the fear of being identified students might not be able to express themselves honestly. Unstructured and anonymous feedback might help resolve the apprehensions and reluctance of students to give true feedback. We conducted a study to compare quantitative and qualitative data obtained through an anonymous and standardized official evaluation system. One hundred and ten medical students of Year III of Shifa College of Medicine participated in our study during an integrated module. We created an anonymous portal on the website www.freesuggestionbox.com and provided its link to the students. We encouraged students to reflect on their learning process throughout the module and provide quantitative feedback on the anonymous portal at the end of the module. Students also provided structured feedback on a standardized official evaluation questionnaire utilizing a 21-items questionnaire and optional comments as per routine for each faculty member. Quantitative and qualitative data of unstructured and anonymous feedback were analyzed and compared with the feedback provided on the official structures feedback proformas. Broad themes after being assessed by authors were assigned codes, commonalities in both feedbacks were analyzed and any new areas highlighted by students were identified. Quantitative data obtained through each feedback was statistically similar. Students provided more information about new learning strategies incorporated in the module on the anonymous portal in comparison to the official structured feedback portal. The total number of comments on the anonymous feedback portal was much higher than the official feedback portal. Anonymous and real-time feedback may influence the way the message is received and processed and may allow faculty to immediately resolve highlighted problems, ensure active participation and reduce insecurities of medical students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信