{"title":"语音识别应用的基音提取算法","authors":"R. Sankar","doi":"10.1109/SSST.1988.17080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two computationally simple pitch-extraction algorithms based on the autocorrelation method of pitch determination are presented. Both algorithms have been implemented in software, and their performance has been evaluated. The first pitch-extraction algorithm (PEA Hash 1) uses center clipping and infinite peak dipping for time-domain preprocessing before computing autocorrelation while the second algorithm (PEA Hash 2) nonlinearly distorts the speech signal before center clipping and autocorrelation computation. PEA Hash 2 provides a better pitch detection estimate than PEA Hash 1 and also eliminates the need to adjust critically the clipping level threshold. The initial results obtained by comparing the average gross pitch error rate suggest that PEA Hash 2 is better (by a factor of two or more) than PEA Hash 1.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":345412,"journal":{"name":"[1988] Proceedings. The Twentieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pitch extraction algorithm for voice recognition applications\",\"authors\":\"R. Sankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SSST.1988.17080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two computationally simple pitch-extraction algorithms based on the autocorrelation method of pitch determination are presented. Both algorithms have been implemented in software, and their performance has been evaluated. The first pitch-extraction algorithm (PEA Hash 1) uses center clipping and infinite peak dipping for time-domain preprocessing before computing autocorrelation while the second algorithm (PEA Hash 2) nonlinearly distorts the speech signal before center clipping and autocorrelation computation. PEA Hash 2 provides a better pitch detection estimate than PEA Hash 1 and also eliminates the need to adjust critically the clipping level threshold. The initial results obtained by comparing the average gross pitch error rate suggest that PEA Hash 2 is better (by a factor of two or more) than PEA Hash 1.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":345412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1988] Proceedings. The Twentieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1988] Proceedings. The Twentieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSST.1988.17080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] Proceedings. The Twentieth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSST.1988.17080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pitch extraction algorithm for voice recognition applications
Two computationally simple pitch-extraction algorithms based on the autocorrelation method of pitch determination are presented. Both algorithms have been implemented in software, and their performance has been evaluated. The first pitch-extraction algorithm (PEA Hash 1) uses center clipping and infinite peak dipping for time-domain preprocessing before computing autocorrelation while the second algorithm (PEA Hash 2) nonlinearly distorts the speech signal before center clipping and autocorrelation computation. PEA Hash 2 provides a better pitch detection estimate than PEA Hash 1 and also eliminates the need to adjust critically the clipping level threshold. The initial results obtained by comparing the average gross pitch error rate suggest that PEA Hash 2 is better (by a factor of two or more) than PEA Hash 1.<>