Mohid Land -多孔介质——样地尺度和流域尺度土壤水文模拟工具

P. Chambel-Leitão, T. Ramos, T. Domingos, R. Neves
{"title":"Mohid Land -多孔介质——样地尺度和流域尺度土壤水文模拟工具","authors":"P. Chambel-Leitão, T. Ramos, T. Domingos, R. Neves","doi":"10.2174/1874378101509010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrological modeling is becoming more important in water management. Soil hydrological models are in- creasingly being used to provide services to farmers and to water supply managers. This study tests the stability and ad- equability of MOHID LAND-PM in modelling soil water dynamics. Soil water flow and content was simulated in five soils with different soil textures (sand, sandy loam, clay, loam, and silt). The results were then compared with HYDRUS- 1D simulations using the same input data. Soil domain was divided into 100 layers up to a depth of 2 m. Five additional simulations were carried out in MOHID LAND-PM in order to quantify the error of reducing the number of layers to 10 (instead of 100) when discretizing the soil profile. This is relevant in a watershed model like MOHID LAND-PM since the computing time is greatly reduced. MOHID LAND-PM results were compared with those of HYDRUS using Nash- Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) and Percent bias (PBIAS). Soil volumetric water content, pressure heads, and soil water velocity were compared for 4 depths. For the water contents, NSE was above 0.87 for sand and above 0.97 for all other soils and layers except for the clay soil (NSE≥0.01). For pressure heads, NSE >0.46 for sand and >0.98 for all other soils and layers except clay (NSE≥-23.95). Statistical analysis shows a soil water velocity of NSE below 0.0 for most sand and clay depths, and above 0.58 NSE for all other soils. PBias shows that in general, MOHID LAND-PM tends to underesti- mate HYDRUS soil water content and velocities.","PeriodicalId":247243,"journal":{"name":"The Open Hydrology Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mohid Land - Porous Media, a Tool for Modeling Soil Hydrology at PlotScale and Watershed Scale\",\"authors\":\"P. Chambel-Leitão, T. Ramos, T. Domingos, R. Neves\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874378101509010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hydrological modeling is becoming more important in water management. Soil hydrological models are in- creasingly being used to provide services to farmers and to water supply managers. This study tests the stability and ad- equability of MOHID LAND-PM in modelling soil water dynamics. Soil water flow and content was simulated in five soils with different soil textures (sand, sandy loam, clay, loam, and silt). The results were then compared with HYDRUS- 1D simulations using the same input data. Soil domain was divided into 100 layers up to a depth of 2 m. Five additional simulations were carried out in MOHID LAND-PM in order to quantify the error of reducing the number of layers to 10 (instead of 100) when discretizing the soil profile. This is relevant in a watershed model like MOHID LAND-PM since the computing time is greatly reduced. MOHID LAND-PM results were compared with those of HYDRUS using Nash- Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) and Percent bias (PBIAS). Soil volumetric water content, pressure heads, and soil water velocity were compared for 4 depths. For the water contents, NSE was above 0.87 for sand and above 0.97 for all other soils and layers except for the clay soil (NSE≥0.01). For pressure heads, NSE >0.46 for sand and >0.98 for all other soils and layers except clay (NSE≥-23.95). Statistical analysis shows a soil water velocity of NSE below 0.0 for most sand and clay depths, and above 0.58 NSE for all other soils. PBias shows that in general, MOHID LAND-PM tends to underesti- mate HYDRUS soil water content and velocities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Hydrology Journal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Hydrology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101509010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Hydrology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101509010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水文建模在水资源管理中变得越来越重要。土壤水文模型越来越多地被用于为农民和供水管理人员提供服务。本研究验证了MOHID LAND-PM模型在模拟土壤水动力学方面的稳定性和均衡性。模拟了5种不同质地土壤(砂土、砂壤土、粘土、壤土和粉土)的土壤水分流动和含量。然后将结果与使用相同输入数据的HYDRUS- 1D模拟结果进行比较。土壤区域被划分为100层,深度为2 m。为了量化将土壤剖面离散化时将层数减少到10层(而不是100层)的误差,在MOHID LAND-PM中进行了另外5次模拟。这在像MOHID LAND-PM这样的流域模型中是相关的,因为计算时间大大减少了。采用Nash- Sutcliffe模型效率(NSE)和百分比偏差(PBIAS)对MOHID LAND-PM结果与HYDRUS进行比较。比较了4个深度的土壤体积含水量、压头和土壤水速。砂土的NSE均在0.87以上,除粘土外其余各土层的NSE均在0.97以上(NSE≥0.01)。对于压头,砂的NSE >0.46,除粘土外的所有其他土壤和层的NSE >0.98 (NSE≥-23.95)。统计分析表明,大部分砂土和粘土土层的土壤水分流速NSE小于0.0,其余土层的土壤水分流速均大于0.58 NSE。PBias表明,在一般情况下,MOHID LAND-PM倾向于低估含水土壤含水量和流速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mohid Land - Porous Media, a Tool for Modeling Soil Hydrology at PlotScale and Watershed Scale
Hydrological modeling is becoming more important in water management. Soil hydrological models are in- creasingly being used to provide services to farmers and to water supply managers. This study tests the stability and ad- equability of MOHID LAND-PM in modelling soil water dynamics. Soil water flow and content was simulated in five soils with different soil textures (sand, sandy loam, clay, loam, and silt). The results were then compared with HYDRUS- 1D simulations using the same input data. Soil domain was divided into 100 layers up to a depth of 2 m. Five additional simulations were carried out in MOHID LAND-PM in order to quantify the error of reducing the number of layers to 10 (instead of 100) when discretizing the soil profile. This is relevant in a watershed model like MOHID LAND-PM since the computing time is greatly reduced. MOHID LAND-PM results were compared with those of HYDRUS using Nash- Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) and Percent bias (PBIAS). Soil volumetric water content, pressure heads, and soil water velocity were compared for 4 depths. For the water contents, NSE was above 0.87 for sand and above 0.97 for all other soils and layers except for the clay soil (NSE≥0.01). For pressure heads, NSE >0.46 for sand and >0.98 for all other soils and layers except clay (NSE≥-23.95). Statistical analysis shows a soil water velocity of NSE below 0.0 for most sand and clay depths, and above 0.58 NSE for all other soils. PBias shows that in general, MOHID LAND-PM tends to underesti- mate HYDRUS soil water content and velocities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信