仿射不变局部检测器与描述子的比较

K. Mikolajczyk, C. Schmid
{"title":"仿射不变局部检测器与描述子的比较","authors":"K. Mikolajczyk, C. Schmid","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.38605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we summarize recent progress on local photometric invariants. The photometric invariants can be used to find correspondences in the presence of significant viewpoint changes. We evaluate the performance of region detectors and descriptors. We compare several methods for detecting affine regions [4, 9, 11, 18, 17]. We evaluate the repeatability of the detected regions, the accuracy of the detectors and the invariance to geometric as well as photometric image transformations. Furthermore, we compare several local descriptors [3, 5, 8, 14, 19]. The local descriptors are evaluated in terms of two properties: robustness and distinctiveness. The evaluation is carried out for different image transformations and scene types. We observe that the ranking of the detectors and descriptors remains the same regardless the scene type or image transformation.","PeriodicalId":347658,"journal":{"name":"2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of affine-invariant local detectors and descriptors\",\"authors\":\"K. Mikolajczyk, C. Schmid\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.38605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we summarize recent progress on local photometric invariants. The photometric invariants can be used to find correspondences in the presence of significant viewpoint changes. We evaluate the performance of region detectors and descriptors. We compare several methods for detecting affine regions [4, 9, 11, 18, 17]. We evaluate the repeatability of the detected regions, the accuracy of the detectors and the invariance to geometric as well as photometric image transformations. Furthermore, we compare several local descriptors [3, 5, 8, 14, 19]. The local descriptors are evaluated in terms of two properties: robustness and distinctiveness. The evaluation is carried out for different image transformations and scene types. We observe that the ranking of the detectors and descriptors remains the same regardless the scene type or image transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.38605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2004 12th European Signal Processing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.38605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

本文综述了局部光度不变量的研究进展。光度不变量可用于发现存在显著视点变化的对应关系。我们评估了区域检测器和描述符的性能。我们比较了几种检测仿射区域的方法[4,9,11,18,17]。我们评估了检测区域的可重复性,检测器的准确性以及对几何和光度图像变换的不变性。此外,我们比较了几个局部描述符[3,5,8,14,19]。根据鲁棒性和显著性两个性质对局部描述符进行了评估。对不同的图像变换和场景类型进行了评价。我们观察到,无论场景类型或图像变换,检测器和描述符的排名都是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of affine-invariant local detectors and descriptors
In this paper we summarize recent progress on local photometric invariants. The photometric invariants can be used to find correspondences in the presence of significant viewpoint changes. We evaluate the performance of region detectors and descriptors. We compare several methods for detecting affine regions [4, 9, 11, 18, 17]. We evaluate the repeatability of the detected regions, the accuracy of the detectors and the invariance to geometric as well as photometric image transformations. Furthermore, we compare several local descriptors [3, 5, 8, 14, 19]. The local descriptors are evaluated in terms of two properties: robustness and distinctiveness. The evaluation is carried out for different image transformations and scene types. We observe that the ranking of the detectors and descriptors remains the same regardless the scene type or image transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信