女权主义=妇女运动?术语和性别对女权主义背书的影响

Christyn Wietholter, Amy L. Hillard
{"title":"女权主义=妇女运动?术语和性别对女权主义背书的影响","authors":"Christyn Wietholter, Amy L. Hillard","doi":"10.33921/ktzn7959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on past research, this study examined whether endorsement of feminism is still influenced by terminology used (i.e., feminism vs. women’s movement) and participant gender. One hundred undergraduates (36 men and 64 women) were randomly assigned to receive scale items that identified feminist values but used the terms feminism/feminist or women’s movement/women depending on the condition they were assigned. In addition, activism, acceptance of traditional gender roles, and feminist identification were measured. As expected, men endorsed feminism less than women overall, and participants in the women’s movement (vs. feminism) condition endorsed feminism more. When controlling for feminist identification, there was no gender difference in activism or acceptance of gender roles for participants in the feminism/feminist condition; however, women reported more activism and less acceptance of gender roles than men in the women’s movement/women condition. This study suggests that there is still a stigma surrounding feminism that influences its endorsement, especially among women.","PeriodicalId":419892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Relations, Intergroup Relations and Identity","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminism = Women’s Movement? The Effects of Terminology and Gender on Endorsement of Feminism\",\"authors\":\"Christyn Wietholter, Amy L. Hillard\",\"doi\":\"10.33921/ktzn7959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on past research, this study examined whether endorsement of feminism is still influenced by terminology used (i.e., feminism vs. women’s movement) and participant gender. One hundred undergraduates (36 men and 64 women) were randomly assigned to receive scale items that identified feminist values but used the terms feminism/feminist or women’s movement/women depending on the condition they were assigned. In addition, activism, acceptance of traditional gender roles, and feminist identification were measured. As expected, men endorsed feminism less than women overall, and participants in the women’s movement (vs. feminism) condition endorsed feminism more. When controlling for feminist identification, there was no gender difference in activism or acceptance of gender roles for participants in the feminism/feminist condition; however, women reported more activism and less acceptance of gender roles than men in the women’s movement/women condition. This study suggests that there is still a stigma surrounding feminism that influences its endorsement, especially among women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Relations, Intergroup Relations and Identity\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Relations, Intergroup Relations and Identity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33921/ktzn7959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Relations, Intergroup Relations and Identity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33921/ktzn7959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去研究的基础上,本研究考察了对女权主义的支持是否仍然受到所用术语(即女权主义与妇女运动)和参与者性别的影响。100名大学生(36名男性和64名女性)被随机分配,接受确定女权主义价值观的量表项目,但根据分配的条件使用女权主义/女权主义或妇女运动/妇女等术语。此外,还测量了行动主义、对传统性别角色的接受程度和女权主义认同。正如预期的那样,男性总体上比女性更不支持女权主义,而女性运动(相对于女权主义)的参与者更支持女权主义。在控制女性主义认同的条件下,女性主义/女权主义条件下的参与者在积极主义或性别角色接受方面没有性别差异;然而,在妇女运动/妇女条件下,女性比男性更积极,对性别角色的接受程度更低。这项研究表明,围绕女权主义的污名仍然影响着它的认可,尤其是在女性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feminism = Women’s Movement? The Effects of Terminology and Gender on Endorsement of Feminism
Building on past research, this study examined whether endorsement of feminism is still influenced by terminology used (i.e., feminism vs. women’s movement) and participant gender. One hundred undergraduates (36 men and 64 women) were randomly assigned to receive scale items that identified feminist values but used the terms feminism/feminist or women’s movement/women depending on the condition they were assigned. In addition, activism, acceptance of traditional gender roles, and feminist identification were measured. As expected, men endorsed feminism less than women overall, and participants in the women’s movement (vs. feminism) condition endorsed feminism more. When controlling for feminist identification, there was no gender difference in activism or acceptance of gender roles for participants in the feminism/feminist condition; however, women reported more activism and less acceptance of gender roles than men in the women’s movement/women condition. This study suggests that there is still a stigma surrounding feminism that influences its endorsement, especially among women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信