Joko Suntoro, Febrian Wahyu Christanto, Henny Indriyawati
{"title":"基于AWEIG+ADACOST贝叶斯算法的高维数据和类不平衡问题软件缺陷预测","authors":"Joko Suntoro, Febrian Wahyu Christanto, Henny Indriyawati","doi":"10.24246/IJITEB.112018.36-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most important part in software engineering is a software defect prediction. Software defect prediction is defined as a software prediction process from errors, failures, and system errors. Machine learning methods are used by researchers to predict software defects including estimation, association, classification, clustering, and datasets analysis. Datasets of NASA Metrics Data Program (NASA MDP) is one of the metric software that researchers use to predict software defects. NASA MDP datasets contain unbalanced classes and high dimensional data, so they will affect the classification evaluation results to be low. In this research, data with unbalanced classes will be solved by the AdaCost method and high dimensional data will be handled with the Average Weight Information Gain (AWEIG) method, while the classification method that will be used is the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The proposed method is named AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian. In this experiment, the AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian algorithm is compared to the Naïve Bayesian algorithm. The results showed the mean of Area Under the Curve (AUC) algorithm AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian yields better than just a Naïve Bayes algorithm with respectively mean of AUC values are 0.752 and 0.696.","PeriodicalId":249381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Technology and Business","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software Defect Prediction Using AWEIG+ADACOST Bayesian Algorithm for Handling High Dimensional Data and Class Imbalance Problem\",\"authors\":\"Joko Suntoro, Febrian Wahyu Christanto, Henny Indriyawati\",\"doi\":\"10.24246/IJITEB.112018.36-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most important part in software engineering is a software defect prediction. Software defect prediction is defined as a software prediction process from errors, failures, and system errors. Machine learning methods are used by researchers to predict software defects including estimation, association, classification, clustering, and datasets analysis. Datasets of NASA Metrics Data Program (NASA MDP) is one of the metric software that researchers use to predict software defects. NASA MDP datasets contain unbalanced classes and high dimensional data, so they will affect the classification evaluation results to be low. In this research, data with unbalanced classes will be solved by the AdaCost method and high dimensional data will be handled with the Average Weight Information Gain (AWEIG) method, while the classification method that will be used is the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The proposed method is named AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian. In this experiment, the AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian algorithm is compared to the Naïve Bayesian algorithm. The results showed the mean of Area Under the Curve (AUC) algorithm AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian yields better than just a Naïve Bayes algorithm with respectively mean of AUC values are 0.752 and 0.696.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information Technology and Business\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information Technology and Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24246/IJITEB.112018.36-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Technology and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24246/IJITEB.112018.36-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
软件工程中最重要的部分是软件缺陷预测。软件缺陷预测被定义为错误、故障和系统错误的软件预测过程。研究人员使用机器学习方法来预测软件缺陷,包括估计、关联、分类、聚类和数据集分析。NASA Metrics Data Program (NASA MDP)的数据集是研究人员用来预测软件缺陷的度量软件之一。NASA MDP数据集包含不平衡类和高维数据,因此会影响分类评价结果低。在本研究中,类不平衡的数据将使用AdaCost方法求解,高维数据将使用平均权重信息增益(Average Weight Information Gain, AWEIG)方法处理,而分类方法将使用Naïve Bayes算法。该方法被命名为AWEIG + AdaCost贝叶斯。本实验将AWEIG + AdaCost贝叶斯算法与Naïve贝叶斯算法进行对比。结果表明,AWEIG + AdaCost贝叶斯算法的AUC均值分别为0.752和0.696,优于单纯的Naïve贝叶斯算法。
Software Defect Prediction Using AWEIG+ADACOST Bayesian Algorithm for Handling High Dimensional Data and Class Imbalance Problem
The most important part in software engineering is a software defect prediction. Software defect prediction is defined as a software prediction process from errors, failures, and system errors. Machine learning methods are used by researchers to predict software defects including estimation, association, classification, clustering, and datasets analysis. Datasets of NASA Metrics Data Program (NASA MDP) is one of the metric software that researchers use to predict software defects. NASA MDP datasets contain unbalanced classes and high dimensional data, so they will affect the classification evaluation results to be low. In this research, data with unbalanced classes will be solved by the AdaCost method and high dimensional data will be handled with the Average Weight Information Gain (AWEIG) method, while the classification method that will be used is the Naïve Bayes algorithm. The proposed method is named AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian. In this experiment, the AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian algorithm is compared to the Naïve Bayesian algorithm. The results showed the mean of Area Under the Curve (AUC) algorithm AWEIG + AdaCost Bayesian yields better than just a Naïve Bayes algorithm with respectively mean of AUC values are 0.752 and 0.696.