设计个人破产制度:印度破产和破产法的基准框架

A. Feibelman, R. Sane
{"title":"设计个人破产制度:印度破产和破产法的基准框架","authors":"A. Feibelman, R. Sane","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3675810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In December 2019, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified provisions for insolvencies of personal guarantors to corporate debtors under that country’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, thereby putting those provisions into force. The IBBI has released regulations for cases involving guarantors and has indicated that it is moving toward notification of the provisions of the Code for other personal debtors. While the Code and regulations for personal guarantors set out a broad framework for the personal insolvency regime, it is still unclear whether there will be limits, requirements, or guidance for various aspects of repayment plans that debtors must propose in insolvency. \n \nThis article, forthcoming in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's publication, \"The Evolving Insolvency and Bankruptcy Regime in India: A Narrative,\" proposes that repayment plans and other aspects of the insolvency process should be standardized enough to ensure a baseline treatment of both debtors and creditors, subject to some flexibility for unique or exceptional circumstances. While a generally negotiated process may be appropriate for commercial debtors under the Code, there are good reasons to believe that the process for personal debtors should be significantly more rule-bound. If the basic design of repayment plans can be specified, it might be best to dispense with the need for creditors to vote to approve plans, except perhaps to approve plans with more generous relief to debtors, and the Board or the adjudicating authorities might also adopt an approach to ‘fast-track’ debtors to bankruptcy who are unlikely to be able to repay any significant amount to creditors in insolvency.","PeriodicalId":137765,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a Personal Insolvency Regime: A Baseline Framework for India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code\",\"authors\":\"A. Feibelman, R. Sane\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3675810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In December 2019, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified provisions for insolvencies of personal guarantors to corporate debtors under that country’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, thereby putting those provisions into force. The IBBI has released regulations for cases involving guarantors and has indicated that it is moving toward notification of the provisions of the Code for other personal debtors. While the Code and regulations for personal guarantors set out a broad framework for the personal insolvency regime, it is still unclear whether there will be limits, requirements, or guidance for various aspects of repayment plans that debtors must propose in insolvency. \\n \\nThis article, forthcoming in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's publication, \\\"The Evolving Insolvency and Bankruptcy Regime in India: A Narrative,\\\" proposes that repayment plans and other aspects of the insolvency process should be standardized enough to ensure a baseline treatment of both debtors and creditors, subject to some flexibility for unique or exceptional circumstances. While a generally negotiated process may be appropriate for commercial debtors under the Code, there are good reasons to believe that the process for personal debtors should be significantly more rule-bound. If the basic design of repayment plans can be specified, it might be best to dispense with the need for creditors to vote to approve plans, except perhaps to approve plans with more generous relief to debtors, and the Board or the adjudicating authorities might also adopt an approach to ‘fast-track’ debtors to bankruptcy who are unlikely to be able to repay any significant amount to creditors in insolvency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3675810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年12月,印度破产和破产委员会(IBBI)通知了根据该国《破产和破产法》对公司债务人的个人担保人破产的规定,从而使这些规定生效。IBBI已经发布了涉及担保人的案件的条例,并表示它正在向其他个人债务人通知《守则》的规定。虽然《守则》和个人担保人条例为个人破产制度制定了一个广泛的框架,但仍不清楚是否会对债务人在破产时必须提出的还款计划的各个方面有限制、要求或指导。这篇即将发表在印度破产和破产委员会出版物《印度不断发展的破产和破产制度:叙述》中的文章提出,偿还计划和破产程序的其他方面应该足够标准化,以确保对债务人和债权人都有一个基线处理,并在特殊或特殊情况下有一定的灵活性。虽然根据《治罪法》,一般谈判程序可能适合商业债务人,但有充分的理由认为,个人债务人的程序应该有更多的规则约束。如果还款计划的基本设计可以明确规定,最好是不需要债权人投票批准计划,除非批准对债务人提供更慷慨救济的计划,董事会或裁决当局也可以采取一种“快速通道”破产债务人的方法,这些债务人不太可能向破产债权人偿还任何大笔款项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing a Personal Insolvency Regime: A Baseline Framework for India’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
In December 2019, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) notified provisions for insolvencies of personal guarantors to corporate debtors under that country’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, thereby putting those provisions into force. The IBBI has released regulations for cases involving guarantors and has indicated that it is moving toward notification of the provisions of the Code for other personal debtors. While the Code and regulations for personal guarantors set out a broad framework for the personal insolvency regime, it is still unclear whether there will be limits, requirements, or guidance for various aspects of repayment plans that debtors must propose in insolvency. This article, forthcoming in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's publication, "The Evolving Insolvency and Bankruptcy Regime in India: A Narrative," proposes that repayment plans and other aspects of the insolvency process should be standardized enough to ensure a baseline treatment of both debtors and creditors, subject to some flexibility for unique or exceptional circumstances. While a generally negotiated process may be appropriate for commercial debtors under the Code, there are good reasons to believe that the process for personal debtors should be significantly more rule-bound. If the basic design of repayment plans can be specified, it might be best to dispense with the need for creditors to vote to approve plans, except perhaps to approve plans with more generous relief to debtors, and the Board or the adjudicating authorities might also adopt an approach to ‘fast-track’ debtors to bankruptcy who are unlikely to be able to repay any significant amount to creditors in insolvency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信