{"title":"球囊内金属异物1例报告","authors":"Maan Ali Almokdad, Ashraf Alakkad","doi":"10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries exhibit variations based on multiple factors, including size, composition, location, type, contamination, the extent of tissue damage, and potential complications that may arise. Case Presentation: This case study describes a 48-year-old male patient who presented to the outpatient clinic with a progressive decline in vision in the right eye lasting three weeks. The patient reported a history of redness in the affected eye, occurring for several days after performing maintenance work. Intraocular pressure measurements were normal for both eyes. The slit lamp examination revealed a corneal opacity near the limbus at the 2 o'clock position in the right eye, along with a small peripheral iris hole aligned with the corneal opacity. Additional diagnostic investigations, including a B-scan ultrasound and a CT scan of the orbit without contrast, were conducted. The B-scan ultrasound showed a clear vitreous and a flat retina, while the CT scan detected a metallic foreign body measuring 3x3 mm. The foreign body was found to be partially embedded in the lens and partially in the vitreous, as confirmed by the imaging. As a result, the patient was admitted to the hospital, and a comprehensive treatment plan was implemented. Topical antibiotics, steroids, cycloplegic, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops were prescribed. The patient underwent cataract surgery with sulcus intraocular lens implantation, combined with a pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign body. Additional procedures, such as 360 laser treatment, air-fluid exchange, and injection of SF6 gas, were performed. Conclusion: This case highlights the successful management of an intraocular foreign body injury, emphasizing the significance of prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical intervention in achieving positive visual outcomes.","PeriodicalId":193141,"journal":{"name":"SAS Journal of Medicine","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intralenticular Metallic Foreign Body: A Case Report\",\"authors\":\"Maan Ali Almokdad, Ashraf Alakkad\",\"doi\":\"10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries exhibit variations based on multiple factors, including size, composition, location, type, contamination, the extent of tissue damage, and potential complications that may arise. Case Presentation: This case study describes a 48-year-old male patient who presented to the outpatient clinic with a progressive decline in vision in the right eye lasting three weeks. The patient reported a history of redness in the affected eye, occurring for several days after performing maintenance work. Intraocular pressure measurements were normal for both eyes. The slit lamp examination revealed a corneal opacity near the limbus at the 2 o'clock position in the right eye, along with a small peripheral iris hole aligned with the corneal opacity. Additional diagnostic investigations, including a B-scan ultrasound and a CT scan of the orbit without contrast, were conducted. The B-scan ultrasound showed a clear vitreous and a flat retina, while the CT scan detected a metallic foreign body measuring 3x3 mm. The foreign body was found to be partially embedded in the lens and partially in the vitreous, as confirmed by the imaging. As a result, the patient was admitted to the hospital, and a comprehensive treatment plan was implemented. Topical antibiotics, steroids, cycloplegic, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops were prescribed. The patient underwent cataract surgery with sulcus intraocular lens implantation, combined with a pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign body. Additional procedures, such as 360 laser treatment, air-fluid exchange, and injection of SF6 gas, were performed. Conclusion: This case highlights the successful management of an intraocular foreign body injury, emphasizing the significance of prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical intervention in achieving positive visual outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAS Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAS Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sasjm.2023.v09i08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intralenticular Metallic Foreign Body: A Case Report
Background: Intraocular foreign body (IOFB) injuries exhibit variations based on multiple factors, including size, composition, location, type, contamination, the extent of tissue damage, and potential complications that may arise. Case Presentation: This case study describes a 48-year-old male patient who presented to the outpatient clinic with a progressive decline in vision in the right eye lasting three weeks. The patient reported a history of redness in the affected eye, occurring for several days after performing maintenance work. Intraocular pressure measurements were normal for both eyes. The slit lamp examination revealed a corneal opacity near the limbus at the 2 o'clock position in the right eye, along with a small peripheral iris hole aligned with the corneal opacity. Additional diagnostic investigations, including a B-scan ultrasound and a CT scan of the orbit without contrast, were conducted. The B-scan ultrasound showed a clear vitreous and a flat retina, while the CT scan detected a metallic foreign body measuring 3x3 mm. The foreign body was found to be partially embedded in the lens and partially in the vitreous, as confirmed by the imaging. As a result, the patient was admitted to the hospital, and a comprehensive treatment plan was implemented. Topical antibiotics, steroids, cycloplegic, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops were prescribed. The patient underwent cataract surgery with sulcus intraocular lens implantation, combined with a pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign body. Additional procedures, such as 360 laser treatment, air-fluid exchange, and injection of SF6 gas, were performed. Conclusion: This case highlights the successful management of an intraocular foreign body injury, emphasizing the significance of prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical intervention in achieving positive visual outcomes.