德国工业的技术决策:标准、方法和组织

Daniel Gerhard, K. Voigt
{"title":"德国工业的技术决策:标准、方法和组织","authors":"Daniel Gerhard, K. Voigt","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because of limited resources and inherent risks, companies tend to develop not all technologies by themselves. There are alternatives to internal development i.e. company acquisition or contract development. To have a decision basis for one of these alternatives it is necessary to evaluate those in the context of the company. The decision about internal or external acquisition of technologies is part of the technology strategy which is closely connected to the firm's competitive and market entry strategy. Our study addresses the connection between the technology acquisition decision and the company's technological market entry and competitive strategy. The quantitative explanatory study in the German industry shows that there are some notable differences between companies with cost leadership and differentiation strategy. Differentiators more often used joint research and patent or technology purchasing and involve more often the legal department in the decision process. Pioneers, compared to followers, involve more internal stakeholders in the decision process, e.g. corporate management, R&D and the legal department. Furthermore, they tend to source technology externally more often using joint research approaches.","PeriodicalId":185147,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology make-or-buy decisions in the german industry: Criteria, methods and organization\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Gerhard, K. Voigt\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Because of limited resources and inherent risks, companies tend to develop not all technologies by themselves. There are alternatives to internal development i.e. company acquisition or contract development. To have a decision basis for one of these alternatives it is necessary to evaluate those in the context of the company. The decision about internal or external acquisition of technologies is part of the technology strategy which is closely connected to the firm's competitive and market entry strategy. Our study addresses the connection between the technology acquisition decision and the company's technological market entry and competitive strategy. The quantitative explanatory study in the German industry shows that there are some notable differences between companies with cost leadership and differentiation strategy. Differentiators more often used joint research and patent or technology purchasing and involve more often the legal department in the decision process. Pioneers, compared to followers, involve more internal stakeholders in the decision process, e.g. corporate management, R&D and the legal department. Furthermore, they tend to source technology externally more often using joint research approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5262137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

由于有限的资源和固有的风险,公司往往不是自己开发所有的技术。除了内部开发,还有其他选择,如公司收购或合同开发。为了对其中一个选择有一个决策基础,有必要在公司的背景下评估这些选择。内部或外部获取技术的决策是技术战略的一部分,与企业的竞争战略和市场进入战略密切相关。本研究探讨技术收购决策与企业技术市场进入及竞争策略之间的关系。对德国行业的定量解释研究表明,采用成本领先战略的企业与采用差异化战略的企业之间存在显著差异。差异化企业更常采用联合研究和专利或技术采购,并在决策过程中更多地涉及法律部门。与跟随者相比,先行者会让更多的内部利益相关者参与决策过程,例如公司管理层、研发部门和法务部。此外,它们更倾向于使用联合研究方法从外部获取技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technology make-or-buy decisions in the german industry: Criteria, methods and organization
Because of limited resources and inherent risks, companies tend to develop not all technologies by themselves. There are alternatives to internal development i.e. company acquisition or contract development. To have a decision basis for one of these alternatives it is necessary to evaluate those in the context of the company. The decision about internal or external acquisition of technologies is part of the technology strategy which is closely connected to the firm's competitive and market entry strategy. Our study addresses the connection between the technology acquisition decision and the company's technological market entry and competitive strategy. The quantitative explanatory study in the German industry shows that there are some notable differences between companies with cost leadership and differentiation strategy. Differentiators more often used joint research and patent or technology purchasing and involve more often the legal department in the decision process. Pioneers, compared to followers, involve more internal stakeholders in the decision process, e.g. corporate management, R&D and the legal department. Furthermore, they tend to source technology externally more often using joint research approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信