关于“安全政策”这个流行词

D. Sterne
{"title":"关于“安全政策”这个流行词","authors":"D. Sterne","doi":"10.1109/RISP.1991.130789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is pointed out that, although the term 'security policy' is fundamental to computer security, its conflicting meanings have obscured important conceptual distinctions, especially where concerns other than confidentiality are involved. A clearer definition is needed to clarify routine technical discourse, facilitate resolution of key research issues, and establish the scope of security research and standardization efforts. The terms security policy objective, organization security policy, and automated security policy are proposed. These terms are based on simple generalizations of ideas that underlie the trusted computer system evaluation criteria (TCSEC). Yet, they describe a view of security that is more precise, more general, and different than 'confidentiality, integrity, and assured service'. Their usefulness in clarifying conceptual and terminological issues is illustrated through examples.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":445112,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the buzzword 'security policy'\",\"authors\":\"D. Sterne\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RISP.1991.130789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is pointed out that, although the term 'security policy' is fundamental to computer security, its conflicting meanings have obscured important conceptual distinctions, especially where concerns other than confidentiality are involved. A clearer definition is needed to clarify routine technical discourse, facilitate resolution of key research issues, and establish the scope of security research and standardization efforts. The terms security policy objective, organization security policy, and automated security policy are proposed. These terms are based on simple generalizations of ideas that underlie the trusted computer system evaluation criteria (TCSEC). Yet, they describe a view of security that is more precise, more general, and different than 'confidentiality, integrity, and assured service'. Their usefulness in clarifying conceptual and terminological issues is illustrated through examples.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":445112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RISP.1991.130789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RISP.1991.130789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

有人指出,虽然“安全政策”一词是计算机安全的基础,但其相互冲突的含义掩盖了重要的概念区别,特别是在涉及机密性以外的问题时。需要一个更清晰的定义来澄清常规的技术论述,促进关键研究问题的解决,并建立安全研究和标准化工作的范围。提出了安全策略目标、组织安全策略和自动化安全策略等术语。这些术语基于构成可信计算机系统评估标准(TCSEC)的思想的简单概括。然而,它们描述了一种更精确、更通用、不同于“保密性、完整性和有保证的服务”的安全观点。通过实例说明它们在澄清概念和术语问题方面的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the buzzword 'security policy'
It is pointed out that, although the term 'security policy' is fundamental to computer security, its conflicting meanings have obscured important conceptual distinctions, especially where concerns other than confidentiality are involved. A clearer definition is needed to clarify routine technical discourse, facilitate resolution of key research issues, and establish the scope of security research and standardization efforts. The terms security policy objective, organization security policy, and automated security policy are proposed. These terms are based on simple generalizations of ideas that underlie the trusted computer system evaluation criteria (TCSEC). Yet, they describe a view of security that is more precise, more general, and different than 'confidentiality, integrity, and assured service'. Their usefulness in clarifying conceptual and terminological issues is illustrated through examples.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信