{"title":"表示可能性理论中违约的优先级","authors":"C. Liau","doi":"10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is suggested by Yager (1987) that default knowledge can be represented in the framework of possibility theory. In this note, we show a potential application of the proposal. That is, the priorities of defaults can be encoded into the formalism naturally and the results produced by such encoded default theories reflect the strength of the conclusions.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":153967,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representing priorities of defaults in possibility theory\",\"authors\":\"C. Liau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is suggested by Yager (1987) that default knowledge can be represented in the framework of possibility theory. In this note, we show a potential application of the proposal. That is, the priorities of defaults can be encoded into the formalism naturally and the results produced by such encoded default theories reflect the strength of the conclusions.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":153967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 IEEE 3rd International Fuzzy Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Representing priorities of defaults in possibility theory
It is suggested by Yager (1987) that default knowledge can be represented in the framework of possibility theory. In this note, we show a potential application of the proposal. That is, the priorities of defaults can be encoded into the formalism naturally and the results produced by such encoded default theories reflect the strength of the conclusions.<>