伦理:巴西会议BRACIS的研究场景是什么?

L. Carvalho, Lucas Murakami, José Antonio Suzano, Jonice Oliveira, Kate Revoredo, F. Santoro
{"title":"伦理:巴西会议BRACIS的研究场景是什么?","authors":"L. Carvalho, Lucas Murakami, José Antonio Suzano, Jonice Oliveira, Kate Revoredo, F. Santoro","doi":"10.5753/eniac.2022.227590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents many ethical dilemmas, such as explainability, bias, military uses, surveillance capitalism, employment, and jobs. In the scientific context, AI can lead us to a crisis of reproducibility spread across several areas of knowledge and guide mathematicians to solve high complexity problems. Both companies and government forward their guidelines, recommendations, and materials combining Ethics and AI. In this paper, we investigate the involvement of the Brazilian academic-scientific community with moral or ethical aspects through its publications, covering the Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS) as the most prominent Brazilian AI conference. Through a Literature Systematic Review method, we answer the main research question: what is the panorama of the explicit occurrence of ethical aspects in the BRACIS, ENIAC, and STIL conference papers? The results indicate a low occurrence of ethical aspects and increasing behavior over the years. Ethical deliberation was fruitful, constructive, and critical among these few occurrences. Whether in the Brazilian or international context, there are spaces to be filled and open opportunities for exploration along this path.","PeriodicalId":165095,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics: What is the Research Scenario in the Brazilian Conference BRACIS?\",\"authors\":\"L. Carvalho, Lucas Murakami, José Antonio Suzano, Jonice Oliveira, Kate Revoredo, F. Santoro\",\"doi\":\"10.5753/eniac.2022.227590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents many ethical dilemmas, such as explainability, bias, military uses, surveillance capitalism, employment, and jobs. In the scientific context, AI can lead us to a crisis of reproducibility spread across several areas of knowledge and guide mathematicians to solve high complexity problems. Both companies and government forward their guidelines, recommendations, and materials combining Ethics and AI. In this paper, we investigate the involvement of the Brazilian academic-scientific community with moral or ethical aspects through its publications, covering the Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS) as the most prominent Brazilian AI conference. Through a Literature Systematic Review method, we answer the main research question: what is the panorama of the explicit occurrence of ethical aspects in the BRACIS, ENIAC, and STIL conference papers? The results indicate a low occurrence of ethical aspects and increasing behavior over the years. Ethical deliberation was fruitful, constructive, and critical among these few occurrences. Whether in the Brazilian or international context, there are spaces to be filled and open opportunities for exploration along this path.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2022.227590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XIX Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2022.227590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人工智能(AI)带来了许多伦理困境,如可解释性、偏见、军事用途、监视资本主义、就业和就业。在科学背景下,人工智能可以导致我们在多个知识领域的可重复性危机,并指导数学家解决高度复杂的问题。公司和政府都提出了结合伦理和人工智能的指导方针、建议和材料。在本文中,我们通过其出版物调查了巴西学术科学界与道德或伦理方面的参与,涵盖了巴西智能系统会议(BRACIS)作为最突出的巴西人工智能会议。通过文献系统综述的方法,我们回答了主要的研究问题:在BRACIS, ENIAC和STIL会议论文中明确出现的伦理方面的全景是什么?结果表明,近年来道德方面的发生率较低,行为越来越多。在这些为数不多的事件中,伦理思考是富有成效的、建设性的和关键的。无论是在巴西还是国际背景下,沿着这条道路都有空间需要填补,也有探索的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics: What is the Research Scenario in the Brazilian Conference BRACIS?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents many ethical dilemmas, such as explainability, bias, military uses, surveillance capitalism, employment, and jobs. In the scientific context, AI can lead us to a crisis of reproducibility spread across several areas of knowledge and guide mathematicians to solve high complexity problems. Both companies and government forward their guidelines, recommendations, and materials combining Ethics and AI. In this paper, we investigate the involvement of the Brazilian academic-scientific community with moral or ethical aspects through its publications, covering the Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS) as the most prominent Brazilian AI conference. Through a Literature Systematic Review method, we answer the main research question: what is the panorama of the explicit occurrence of ethical aspects in the BRACIS, ENIAC, and STIL conference papers? The results indicate a low occurrence of ethical aspects and increasing behavior over the years. Ethical deliberation was fruitful, constructive, and critical among these few occurrences. Whether in the Brazilian or international context, there are spaces to be filled and open opportunities for exploration along this path.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信