{"title":"结论:当代政治艺术电影","authors":"James J. Harvey","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474423786.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By way of conclusion, I once again bring to the foreground debates on art cinema, in order to answer three questions directly: where precisely do political redistributions exist in the films discussed? How do these redistributions relate specifically to consensus politics? Third, how does the discourse of art cinema itself occupy a particular space of political potential? To answer each question, I revisit key points made in each chapter in order to elaborate on how art cinema proposes confrontations with, and developments from, Rancière’s claim that ‘there is no politics of cinema’.","PeriodicalId":126074,"journal":{"name":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion: Contemporary Political Art Cinema\",\"authors\":\"James J. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474423786.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By way of conclusion, I once again bring to the foreground debates on art cinema, in order to answer three questions directly: where precisely do political redistributions exist in the films discussed? How do these redistributions relate specifically to consensus politics? Third, how does the discourse of art cinema itself occupy a particular space of political potential? To answer each question, I revisit key points made in each chapter in order to elaborate on how art cinema proposes confrontations with, and developments from, Rancière’s claim that ‘there is no politics of cinema’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474423786.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jacques Rancière and the Politics of Art Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474423786.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
By way of conclusion, I once again bring to the foreground debates on art cinema, in order to answer three questions directly: where precisely do political redistributions exist in the films discussed? How do these redistributions relate specifically to consensus politics? Third, how does the discourse of art cinema itself occupy a particular space of political potential? To answer each question, I revisit key points made in each chapter in order to elaborate on how art cinema proposes confrontations with, and developments from, Rancière’s claim that ‘there is no politics of cinema’.