回顾数字应用中的反馈——反馈是否支持学习?

Betty Tärning
{"title":"回顾数字应用中的反馈——反馈是否支持学习?","authors":"Betty Tärning","doi":"10.28945/4104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose The goal of this paper is to examine digital applications used in Swedish schools and whether they fulfill their potential as support for learners. This is done by examining the kinds of feedback they provide and discussing if this feedback supports learning or not. Background The paper targets one aspect regarding which educational apps can be of high value for learners and teachers, namely the feedback they provide. The paper also addresses the need for supportive feedback and reviews 242 apps with respect to what types of feedback they provide. Methodology A sample of apps used in primary school was collected via email to schools in Sweden. The author evaluated each app with respect to what kind of feedback it provided. The article concerns both positive and negative feedback, with a focus on negative. The following types of feedback were evaluated; verification feedback, corrective feedback, elaborated feedback, encouraging feedback and result feedback. Contribution This paper contributes to knowledge regarding how most apps only contain verification feedback (telling the student whether their answer was correct or not). In order to help a student while learning, verification feedback is not enough. Rather, previous research has shown that explanatory feedback is more beneficial for learning. Findings Seventy-seven percent of all apps contained verification feedback, and only 12 % provided the student with some type of explanation as to why their answer was incorrect. Looking at previous research, this is not desirable if one wants the app to support learning and not only act as a testing device. Fifty-five percent of all apps also contained some type of encouragement, but none of this encouragement addressed the task or the effort the learners put into the task - something that would be preferable from a learning perspective. Recommendations for Practitioners There is much to be gained for developers of educational software if they would make more use of the feedback in educational apps. As for now, the feedback is primarily suited for testing and not for learning. For users of apps (teachers, parents, and children) this paper shows that feedback can be and is an important factor to evaluate before deciding if the app is \"worth\" spending time on. Recommendation for Researchers The research describes different types of feedback and their (dis)advantages. Impact on Society The paper stresses that most feedback represented in apps today corresponds to a behavioristic approach comparable to instrumental conditioning by means of reinforcement. In essence, most apps miss the opportunity of treating the learner as an active and constructive being who would benefit from more nu-anced feedback. Future Research Previous research has shown that elaborated feedback is more beneficial for learning, but more research needs to be done here, the amount of elaborated feedback will most likely affect varying student groups and varying tasks in dif-ferent ways. And more importantly, how can we make the students pay attention to and act upon the feedback provided to them. (Less)","PeriodicalId":220667,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Feedback in Digital Applications - Does the Feedback They Provide Support Learning?\",\"authors\":\"Betty Tärning\",\"doi\":\"10.28945/4104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim/Purpose The goal of this paper is to examine digital applications used in Swedish schools and whether they fulfill their potential as support for learners. This is done by examining the kinds of feedback they provide and discussing if this feedback supports learning or not. Background The paper targets one aspect regarding which educational apps can be of high value for learners and teachers, namely the feedback they provide. The paper also addresses the need for supportive feedback and reviews 242 apps with respect to what types of feedback they provide. Methodology A sample of apps used in primary school was collected via email to schools in Sweden. The author evaluated each app with respect to what kind of feedback it provided. The article concerns both positive and negative feedback, with a focus on negative. The following types of feedback were evaluated; verification feedback, corrective feedback, elaborated feedback, encouraging feedback and result feedback. Contribution This paper contributes to knowledge regarding how most apps only contain verification feedback (telling the student whether their answer was correct or not). In order to help a student while learning, verification feedback is not enough. Rather, previous research has shown that explanatory feedback is more beneficial for learning. Findings Seventy-seven percent of all apps contained verification feedback, and only 12 % provided the student with some type of explanation as to why their answer was incorrect. Looking at previous research, this is not desirable if one wants the app to support learning and not only act as a testing device. Fifty-five percent of all apps also contained some type of encouragement, but none of this encouragement addressed the task or the effort the learners put into the task - something that would be preferable from a learning perspective. Recommendations for Practitioners There is much to be gained for developers of educational software if they would make more use of the feedback in educational apps. As for now, the feedback is primarily suited for testing and not for learning. For users of apps (teachers, parents, and children) this paper shows that feedback can be and is an important factor to evaluate before deciding if the app is \\\"worth\\\" spending time on. Recommendation for Researchers The research describes different types of feedback and their (dis)advantages. Impact on Society The paper stresses that most feedback represented in apps today corresponds to a behavioristic approach comparable to instrumental conditioning by means of reinforcement. In essence, most apps miss the opportunity of treating the learner as an active and constructive being who would benefit from more nu-anced feedback. Future Research Previous research has shown that elaborated feedback is more beneficial for learning, but more research needs to be done here, the amount of elaborated feedback will most likely affect varying student groups and varying tasks in dif-ferent ways. And more importantly, how can we make the students pay attention to and act upon the feedback provided to them. (Less)\",\"PeriodicalId\":220667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28945/4104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

目的/目的本文的目的是研究瑞典学校使用的数字应用程序,以及它们是否发挥了支持学习者的潜力。这是通过检查他们提供的各种反馈并讨论这些反馈是否支持学习来完成的。本文的目标是教育应用程序对学习者和教师具有高价值的一个方面,即它们提供的反馈。本文还讨论了支持性反馈的需求,并对242款应用提供的反馈类型进行了评估。通过电子邮件向瑞典的学校收集小学使用的应用程序样本。作者评估了每款应用所提供的反馈。这篇文章涉及到积极和消极的反馈,重点是消极的。评估了以下类型的反馈:验证反馈,纠正反馈,阐述反馈,鼓励反馈和结果反馈。这篇论文有助于了解大多数应用程序如何只包含验证反馈(告诉学生他们的答案是否正确)。为了帮助学生一边学习,验证反馈是不够的。相反,先前的研究表明,解释性反馈对学习更有益。77%的应用程序包含验证反馈,只有12%的应用程序为学生提供了某种类型的解释,说明他们的答案为什么是错误的。从之前的研究来看,如果一个人希望应用程序支持学习,而不仅仅是作为测试设备,那么这是不可取的。55%的应用程序还包含某种类型的鼓励,但这些鼓励都没有针对任务或学习者投入任务的努力——从学习的角度来看,这是更可取的。对于教育软件的开发者来说,如果他们能在教育应用中更多地利用反馈,将会收获很多。到目前为止,反馈主要用于测试,而不是用于学习。对于应用用户(教师、家长和孩子)来说,这篇论文表明,在决定应用是否“值得”投入时间之前,反馈是一个重要的评估因素。研究人员的建议该研究描述了不同类型的反馈及其(缺点)优势。这篇论文强调,今天应用程序中的大多数反馈都对应于一种行为主义方法,类似于通过强化手段进行的工具性条件反射。从本质上讲,大多数应用程序都错过了将学习者视为积极和有建设性的人的机会,他们可以从更细致的反馈中受益。未来研究先前的研究表明,详细的反馈对学习更有益,但这里需要做更多的研究,详细反馈的数量很可能会以不同的方式影响不同的学生群体和不同的任务。更重要的是,我们如何让学生注意并采取行动提供给他们的反馈。(少)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of Feedback in Digital Applications - Does the Feedback They Provide Support Learning?
Aim/Purpose The goal of this paper is to examine digital applications used in Swedish schools and whether they fulfill their potential as support for learners. This is done by examining the kinds of feedback they provide and discussing if this feedback supports learning or not. Background The paper targets one aspect regarding which educational apps can be of high value for learners and teachers, namely the feedback they provide. The paper also addresses the need for supportive feedback and reviews 242 apps with respect to what types of feedback they provide. Methodology A sample of apps used in primary school was collected via email to schools in Sweden. The author evaluated each app with respect to what kind of feedback it provided. The article concerns both positive and negative feedback, with a focus on negative. The following types of feedback were evaluated; verification feedback, corrective feedback, elaborated feedback, encouraging feedback and result feedback. Contribution This paper contributes to knowledge regarding how most apps only contain verification feedback (telling the student whether their answer was correct or not). In order to help a student while learning, verification feedback is not enough. Rather, previous research has shown that explanatory feedback is more beneficial for learning. Findings Seventy-seven percent of all apps contained verification feedback, and only 12 % provided the student with some type of explanation as to why their answer was incorrect. Looking at previous research, this is not desirable if one wants the app to support learning and not only act as a testing device. Fifty-five percent of all apps also contained some type of encouragement, but none of this encouragement addressed the task or the effort the learners put into the task - something that would be preferable from a learning perspective. Recommendations for Practitioners There is much to be gained for developers of educational software if they would make more use of the feedback in educational apps. As for now, the feedback is primarily suited for testing and not for learning. For users of apps (teachers, parents, and children) this paper shows that feedback can be and is an important factor to evaluate before deciding if the app is "worth" spending time on. Recommendation for Researchers The research describes different types of feedback and their (dis)advantages. Impact on Society The paper stresses that most feedback represented in apps today corresponds to a behavioristic approach comparable to instrumental conditioning by means of reinforcement. In essence, most apps miss the opportunity of treating the learner as an active and constructive being who would benefit from more nu-anced feedback. Future Research Previous research has shown that elaborated feedback is more beneficial for learning, but more research needs to be done here, the amount of elaborated feedback will most likely affect varying student groups and varying tasks in dif-ferent ways. And more importantly, how can we make the students pay attention to and act upon the feedback provided to them. (Less)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信