{"title":"Analisis Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Tentang Trading in Influence dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia","authors":"M. Rinaldo, Hervin Yoki Pradikta","doi":"10.24042/AS-SIYASI.V1I1.8955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mode of corruption and crime from time to time has undergone a significant change. This can be seen from the various corruption cases managed by law enforcers, both by the Corruption Eradication Commission, the Police and the Attorney General's Office. Influence trading in reality in the United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) has been categorized as a form of corruption. This is regulated in article 18 of the convention. As a country that has ratified the UNCAC, Indonesia still has not regulated this trade of influence. However, if we examine a number of cases handled by law enforcers such as the KPK (Anti-Corruption Comission), it clearly has this dimension of influence. Such as the chairman of a political party and the family of a public official who takes advantage of their position and closeness to public officials. From this influence there is an undue advantage (undue advantage). In the view of Islam, this is one of the deviant behaviors that will result in a poor work ethic because it tends to give an affair or case that is not the expert. The authorship uses the method of research in a normative juridical manner, where the author uses laws, journal articles, books and documents that support in analyzing the interpretation of fiqh siyasah dusturiyah in the formation of regulations on Trading in Influence (trading influence) in positive law, its formation or by updating existing laws by accommodating the delik trading in influence contained in the UNCAC into Law No.31 of 1999 jo Law No.20 of 2001 on Corruption Crimes , with Ijtihad (ra'yu) from the role of Ahlu al halliwal Aqdhi he has the right to form and revise the rule of law in force, Consequently ratified united nation convention against corruption (UNCAC) by Indonesia through Law No. 7 of 2006 on Ratification of UNCAC is a necessity to adopt norms that are considered important into positive law in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":252033,"journal":{"name":"As-Siyasi : Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"As-Siyasi : Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/AS-SIYASI.V1I1.8955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
腐败和犯罪方式不时发生重大变化。这一点可以从执法人员处理的各种腐败案件中看出,这些案件包括根除腐败委员会、警方和总检察长办公室。在现实中,《联合国反腐败公约》将影响力交易归类为一种腐败形式。《公约》第18条对此作了规定。作为一个已批准《联合国反腐败公约》的国家,印度尼西亚仍未对这种影响力交易进行监管。然而,如果我们研究一些由执法机构(如肃贪委员会)处理的案件,它显然具有这种影响。例如政党主席和公职人员的家人,他们利用自己的地位和与公职人员的亲密关系。这种影响带来了不应有的好处。在伊斯兰教看来,这是一种离经叛道的行为,会导致不良的职业道德,因为它往往会给出一个不是专家的事情或案件。作者以规范的司法方式使用了研究方法,其中作者使用了法律、期刊文章、书籍和文件,这些法律、期刊文章、书籍和文件支持分析fiqh siyasah dusturiyah的解释,以形成成法法中的影响力交易条例(影响力交易),其形成或更新现行法律,将《联合国反腐败公约》所载的利益交易纳入1999年第31号法和2001年关于腐败罪的第20号法。随着Ijtihad (ra'yu)从Ahlu al halliwal Aqdhi的角色,他有权形成和修改现行的法治,因此印度尼西亚通过2006年第7号法律批准了联合国反腐败公约(UNCAC),批准UNCAC是必要的,这被认为是印度尼西亚成文法中重要的规范。
Analisis Fiqh Siyasah Dusturiyah dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Tentang Trading in Influence dalam Hukum Positif di Indonesia
The mode of corruption and crime from time to time has undergone a significant change. This can be seen from the various corruption cases managed by law enforcers, both by the Corruption Eradication Commission, the Police and the Attorney General's Office. Influence trading in reality in the United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) has been categorized as a form of corruption. This is regulated in article 18 of the convention. As a country that has ratified the UNCAC, Indonesia still has not regulated this trade of influence. However, if we examine a number of cases handled by law enforcers such as the KPK (Anti-Corruption Comission), it clearly has this dimension of influence. Such as the chairman of a political party and the family of a public official who takes advantage of their position and closeness to public officials. From this influence there is an undue advantage (undue advantage). In the view of Islam, this is one of the deviant behaviors that will result in a poor work ethic because it tends to give an affair or case that is not the expert. The authorship uses the method of research in a normative juridical manner, where the author uses laws, journal articles, books and documents that support in analyzing the interpretation of fiqh siyasah dusturiyah in the formation of regulations on Trading in Influence (trading influence) in positive law, its formation or by updating existing laws by accommodating the delik trading in influence contained in the UNCAC into Law No.31 of 1999 jo Law No.20 of 2001 on Corruption Crimes , with Ijtihad (ra'yu) from the role of Ahlu al halliwal Aqdhi he has the right to form and revise the rule of law in force, Consequently ratified united nation convention against corruption (UNCAC) by Indonesia through Law No. 7 of 2006 on Ratification of UNCAC is a necessity to adopt norms that are considered important into positive law in Indonesia.