使用韩文WordNet、KorLex的语法检查器中错误判断规则的泛化

Gil-Ja So, Seunghee Lee, H. Kwon
{"title":"使用韩文WordNet、KorLex的语法检查器中错误判断规则的泛化","authors":"Gil-Ja So, Seunghee Lee, H. Kwon","doi":"10.3745/KIPSTB.2011.18B.6.405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Korean grammar checkers typically detect context-dependent errors by employing heuristic rules that are manually formulated by a language expert. These rules are appended each time a new error pattern is detected. However, such grammar checkers are not consistent. In order to resolve this shortcoming, we propose new method for generalizing error decision rules to detect the above errors. For this purpose, we use an existing thesaurus KorLex, which is the Korean version of Princeton WordNet. KorLex has hierarchical word senses for nouns, but does not contain any information about the relationships between cases in a sentence. Through the Tree Cut Model and the MDL(minimum description length) model based on information theory, we extract noun classes from KorLex and generalize error decision rules from these noun classes. In order to verify the accuracy of the new method in an experiment, we extracted nouns used as an object of the four predicates usually confused from a large corpus, and subsequently extracted noun classes from these nouns. We found that the number of error decision rules generalized from these noun classes has decreased to about 64.8%. In conclusion, the precision of our grammar checker exceeds that of conventional ones by 6.2%.","PeriodicalId":122700,"journal":{"name":"The Kips Transactions:partb","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalization of error decision rules in a grammar checker using Korean WordNet, KorLex\",\"authors\":\"Gil-Ja So, Seunghee Lee, H. Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.3745/KIPSTB.2011.18B.6.405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Korean grammar checkers typically detect context-dependent errors by employing heuristic rules that are manually formulated by a language expert. These rules are appended each time a new error pattern is detected. However, such grammar checkers are not consistent. In order to resolve this shortcoming, we propose new method for generalizing error decision rules to detect the above errors. For this purpose, we use an existing thesaurus KorLex, which is the Korean version of Princeton WordNet. KorLex has hierarchical word senses for nouns, but does not contain any information about the relationships between cases in a sentence. Through the Tree Cut Model and the MDL(minimum description length) model based on information theory, we extract noun classes from KorLex and generalize error decision rules from these noun classes. In order to verify the accuracy of the new method in an experiment, we extracted nouns used as an object of the four predicates usually confused from a large corpus, and subsequently extracted noun classes from these nouns. We found that the number of error decision rules generalized from these noun classes has decreased to about 64.8%. In conclusion, the precision of our grammar checker exceeds that of conventional ones by 6.2%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Kips Transactions:partb\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Kips Transactions:partb\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTB.2011.18B.6.405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Kips Transactions:partb","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTB.2011.18B.6.405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

韩语语法检查器通常通过使用启发式规则来检测上下文相关的错误,启发式规则由语言专家手动制定。每次检测到新的错误模式时,都会附加这些规则。然而,这样的语法检查器并不一致。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种新的泛化错误决策规则的方法来检测上述错误。为此,我们使用了一个现有的词库KorLex,它是Princeton WordNet的韩文版本。KorLex对名词具有分层的词义,但不包含关于句子中大小写之间关系的任何信息。通过基于信息论的树切模型(Tree Cut Model)和最小描述长度(MDL)模型,从KorLex中提取名词类,并从这些名词类中归纳出错误决策规则。为了在实验中验证新方法的准确性,我们从一个庞大的语料库中提取了通常混淆的四个谓语的宾语,然后从这些名词中提取了名词类。我们发现,从这些名词类中归纳出的错误决策规则的数量已经下降到64.8%左右。总之,我们的语法检查器的精度比传统的语法检查器高出6.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generalization of error decision rules in a grammar checker using Korean WordNet, KorLex
Korean grammar checkers typically detect context-dependent errors by employing heuristic rules that are manually formulated by a language expert. These rules are appended each time a new error pattern is detected. However, such grammar checkers are not consistent. In order to resolve this shortcoming, we propose new method for generalizing error decision rules to detect the above errors. For this purpose, we use an existing thesaurus KorLex, which is the Korean version of Princeton WordNet. KorLex has hierarchical word senses for nouns, but does not contain any information about the relationships between cases in a sentence. Through the Tree Cut Model and the MDL(minimum description length) model based on information theory, we extract noun classes from KorLex and generalize error decision rules from these noun classes. In order to verify the accuracy of the new method in an experiment, we extracted nouns used as an object of the four predicates usually confused from a large corpus, and subsequently extracted noun classes from these nouns. We found that the number of error decision rules generalized from these noun classes has decreased to about 64.8%. In conclusion, the precision of our grammar checker exceeds that of conventional ones by 6.2%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信