{"title":"低视力观察者对动态显示文本的阅读","authors":"E. M. Fine, E. Peli, A. Labianca","doi":"10.1364/vsia.1995.sub4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When compared to the time required to read a normally displayed page of text, low vision observers read faster from a scroll display, in which the text is continuously panned across a computer screen (Legge et al., 1989). They also read faster from a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) display in which each word is presented to the same place on a computer screen (Rubin & Turano, 1994). The views seen from the scroll display are similar to what would be seen when a magnifier or other low vision aid is scanned across a page of text. Readers with low vision are reported to read text displayed in this manner about 15% faster than a static page of text (Legge et al., 1989). As Legge et al. point out, this advantage may be due, in part, to the time saved because no return sweeps are needed to reposition the eyes at the beginning of the next line of text. This return sweep is time consuming for normally sighted observers (Rayner, 1978), and even more so for low vision observers who are known to have difficulty with eye movement control (cf. Peli, 1986; Whittaker et al., 1991). This advantage for scroll displays was not seen for normally sighted observers in Legge et al.'s study. In fact, they read 44% slower on average.","PeriodicalId":428257,"journal":{"name":"Vision Science and its Applications","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading of Dynamically Displayed Text by Low Vision Observers\",\"authors\":\"E. M. Fine, E. Peli, A. Labianca\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/vsia.1995.sub4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When compared to the time required to read a normally displayed page of text, low vision observers read faster from a scroll display, in which the text is continuously panned across a computer screen (Legge et al., 1989). They also read faster from a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) display in which each word is presented to the same place on a computer screen (Rubin & Turano, 1994). The views seen from the scroll display are similar to what would be seen when a magnifier or other low vision aid is scanned across a page of text. Readers with low vision are reported to read text displayed in this manner about 15% faster than a static page of text (Legge et al., 1989). As Legge et al. point out, this advantage may be due, in part, to the time saved because no return sweeps are needed to reposition the eyes at the beginning of the next line of text. This return sweep is time consuming for normally sighted observers (Rayner, 1978), and even more so for low vision observers who are known to have difficulty with eye movement control (cf. Peli, 1986; Whittaker et al., 1991). This advantage for scroll displays was not seen for normally sighted observers in Legge et al.'s study. In fact, they read 44% slower on average.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Science and its Applications\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Science and its Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/vsia.1995.sub4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Science and its Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/vsia.1995.sub4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与阅读正常显示的文本页面所需的时间相比,低视力观察者从滚动显示中阅读更快,其中文本在计算机屏幕上连续平移(Legge et al., 1989)。在快速串行视觉呈现(RSVP)中,每个单词都呈现在电脑屏幕上的相同位置,他们的阅读速度也更快(Rubin & Turano, 1994)。从滚动显示屏上看到的视图类似于用放大镜或其他弱视辅助设备扫描一页文本时看到的视图。据报道,低视力的读者阅读以这种方式显示的文本比阅读静态文本页面快15%左右(Legge et al., 1989)。正如Legge等人指出的那样,这种优势可能部分是由于节省了时间,因为不需要在下一行文本的开头重新定位眼睛。对于正常视力的观察者来说,这种回扫非常耗时(Rayner, 1978),对于那些已知有眼动控制困难的低视力观察者来说更是如此(cf. Peli, 1986;Whittaker et al., 1991)。在Legge等人的研究中,正常视力的观察者没有看到滚动显示的这种优势。事实上,他们的阅读速度平均要慢44%。
Reading of Dynamically Displayed Text by Low Vision Observers
When compared to the time required to read a normally displayed page of text, low vision observers read faster from a scroll display, in which the text is continuously panned across a computer screen (Legge et al., 1989). They also read faster from a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) display in which each word is presented to the same place on a computer screen (Rubin & Turano, 1994). The views seen from the scroll display are similar to what would be seen when a magnifier or other low vision aid is scanned across a page of text. Readers with low vision are reported to read text displayed in this manner about 15% faster than a static page of text (Legge et al., 1989). As Legge et al. point out, this advantage may be due, in part, to the time saved because no return sweeps are needed to reposition the eyes at the beginning of the next line of text. This return sweep is time consuming for normally sighted observers (Rayner, 1978), and even more so for low vision observers who are known to have difficulty with eye movement control (cf. Peli, 1986; Whittaker et al., 1991). This advantage for scroll displays was not seen for normally sighted observers in Legge et al.'s study. In fact, they read 44% slower on average.