{"title":"光学互连处理器的比较:折叠完美洗牌与三维蝴蝶","authors":"M. Iftekharuddin, K. Jemili, M. A. Karim","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.1993.290788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study has been carried out to quantify the differences between folded perfect shuffle and three-dimensional (3-D) multi-channel butterfly optical interconnection architecture. An application of 3-D butterfly network to implement Hartley transform is also presented.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":183796,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference-NAECON 1993","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between optical interconnection processors: folded perfect-shuffle versus 3-D butterfly\",\"authors\":\"M. Iftekharuddin, K. Jemili, M. A. Karim\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAECON.1993.290788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative study has been carried out to quantify the differences between folded perfect shuffle and three-dimensional (3-D) multi-channel butterfly optical interconnection architecture. An application of 3-D butterfly network to implement Hartley transform is also presented.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":183796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference-NAECON 1993\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference-NAECON 1993\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1993.290788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1993 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference-NAECON 1993","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1993.290788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between optical interconnection processors: folded perfect-shuffle versus 3-D butterfly
A comparative study has been carried out to quantify the differences between folded perfect shuffle and three-dimensional (3-D) multi-channel butterfly optical interconnection architecture. An application of 3-D butterfly network to implement Hartley transform is also presented.<>