通过主动学习构建有效的测试集

Md. Mustafizur Rahman, Mucahid Kutlu, T. Elsayed, Matthew Lease
{"title":"通过主动学习构建有效的测试集","authors":"Md. Mustafizur Rahman, Mucahid Kutlu, T. Elsayed, Matthew Lease","doi":"10.1145/3409256.3409837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test collection, it would be useful to be able to do so without needing to run an entire shared task. Toward this end, we investigate multiple active learning strategies which, without reliance on system rankings: 1) select which documents human assessors should judge; and 2) automatically classify the relevance of additional unjudged documents. To assess our approach, we report experiments on five TREC collections with varying scarcity of relevant documents. We report labeling accuracy achieved, as well as rank correlation when evaluating participant systems based upon these labels vs. full pool judgments. Results show the effectiveness of our approach, and we further analyze how varying relevance scarcity across collections impacts our findings. To support reproducibility and follow-on work, we have shared our code online\\footnote\\urlhttps://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIR_AL_TestCollection_2020/ .","PeriodicalId":430907,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient Test Collection Construction via Active Learning\",\"authors\":\"Md. Mustafizur Rahman, Mucahid Kutlu, T. Elsayed, Matthew Lease\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3409256.3409837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test collection, it would be useful to be able to do so without needing to run an entire shared task. Toward this end, we investigate multiple active learning strategies which, without reliance on system rankings: 1) select which documents human assessors should judge; and 2) automatically classify the relevance of additional unjudged documents. To assess our approach, we report experiments on five TREC collections with varying scarcity of relevant documents. We report labeling accuracy achieved, as well as rank correlation when evaluating participant systems based upon these labels vs. full pool judgments. Results show the effectiveness of our approach, and we further analyze how varying relevance scarcity across collections impacts our findings. To support reproducibility and follow-on work, we have shared our code online\\\\footnote\\\\urlhttps://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIR_AL_TestCollection_2020/ .\",\"PeriodicalId\":430907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409256.3409837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3409256.3409837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

为了以低成本创建新的红外测试集,仔细选择哪些文档值得人类相关性判断是有价值的。共享任务活动,如NIST TREC,汇集来自许多参与系统的文档排名(通常也是交互式运行),以确定最可能的相关文档供人类判断。然而,如果一个人的主要目标仅仅是构建一个测试集合,那么能够在不运行整个共享任务的情况下这样做将是有用的。为此,我们研究了多种主动学习策略,这些策略不依赖于系统排名:1)选择人类评估者应该判断哪些文档;2)自动对其他未判断文件的相关性进行分类。为了评估我们的方法,我们报告了五个具有不同稀缺性的TREC集合的实验。我们报告了标签准确性的实现,以及在评估参与者系统时基于这些标签与全池判断的排名相关性。结果显示了我们方法的有效性,我们进一步分析了不同集合之间的相关性稀缺性如何影响我们的发现。为了支持可重复性和后续工作,我们在网上分享了我们的代码\footnote\urlhttps://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIR_AL_TestCollection_2020/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficient Test Collection Construction via Active Learning
To create a new IR test collection at low cost, it is valuable to carefully select which documents merit human relevance judgments. Shared task campaigns such as NIST TREC pool document rankings from many participating systems (and often interactive runs as well) in order to identify the most likely relevant documents for human judging. However, if one's primary goal is merely to build a test collection, it would be useful to be able to do so without needing to run an entire shared task. Toward this end, we investigate multiple active learning strategies which, without reliance on system rankings: 1) select which documents human assessors should judge; and 2) automatically classify the relevance of additional unjudged documents. To assess our approach, we report experiments on five TREC collections with varying scarcity of relevant documents. We report labeling accuracy achieved, as well as rank correlation when evaluating participant systems based upon these labels vs. full pool judgments. Results show the effectiveness of our approach, and we further analyze how varying relevance scarcity across collections impacts our findings. To support reproducibility and follow-on work, we have shared our code online\footnote\urlhttps://github.com/mdmustafizurrahman/ICTIR_AL_TestCollection_2020/ .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信