软件维护管理策略:从现场观察

G. Stark, P. Oman
{"title":"软件维护管理策略:从现场观察","authors":"G. Stark, P. Oman","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199711/12)9:6%3C365::AID-SMR160%3E3.0.CO;2-J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is much literature describing software maintenance process models, but few comparative studies on the approaches used by managers in the field. This paper describes three software maintenance management strategies currently implemented by six organizations. The strategies are compared on the attributes of performance, economics, efficiency and end-product quality. The paper defines operational measurements for each attribute and describes the data collected over the past two years. \n \n \n \nThe three strategies investigated were labelled the fixed staff/variable schedule, variable staff/fixed schedule and the variable staff/variable schedule. Each strategy has attributes that make it appealing for implementation by a software maintenance project manager. The fixed staff/variable schedule strategy had the fastest priority change response time, the variable staff/fixed schedule strategy had the highest throughput and the best on-schedule performance, and the variable staff/variable schedule had the lowest cost and highest quality. Thus, the key task for a manager is defining the attribute that they would most like to optimize and choosing a strategy that supports that goal. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":383619,"journal":{"name":"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software maintenance management strategies: observations from the field\",\"authors\":\"G. Stark, P. Oman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199711/12)9:6%3C365::AID-SMR160%3E3.0.CO;2-J\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is much literature describing software maintenance process models, but few comparative studies on the approaches used by managers in the field. This paper describes three software maintenance management strategies currently implemented by six organizations. The strategies are compared on the attributes of performance, economics, efficiency and end-product quality. The paper defines operational measurements for each attribute and describes the data collected over the past two years. \\n \\n \\n \\nThe three strategies investigated were labelled the fixed staff/variable schedule, variable staff/fixed schedule and the variable staff/variable schedule. Each strategy has attributes that make it appealing for implementation by a software maintenance project manager. The fixed staff/variable schedule strategy had the fastest priority change response time, the variable staff/fixed schedule strategy had the highest throughput and the best on-schedule performance, and the variable staff/variable schedule had the lowest cost and highest quality. Thus, the key task for a manager is defining the attribute that they would most like to optimize and choosing a strategy that supports that goal. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199711/12)9:6%3C365::AID-SMR160%3E3.0.CO;2-J\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-908X(199711/12)9:6%3C365::AID-SMR160%3E3.0.CO;2-J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

描述软件维护过程模型的文献很多,但对管理人员在该领域使用的方法的比较研究很少。本文描述了目前由六个组织实施的三种软件维护管理策略。从性能、经济性、效率和最终产品质量等方面对两种策略进行了比较。本文定义了每个属性的操作度量,并描述了过去两年中收集的数据。所调查的三种策略被标记为固定人员/可变时间表,可变人员/固定时间表和可变人员/可变时间表。每个策略都有一些属性,使其对软件维护项目经理的实现具有吸引力。固定人员/可变进度策略具有最快的优先级变更响应时间,可变人员/固定进度策略具有最高的吞吐量和最佳的准时性,可变人员/可变进度策略具有最低的成本和最高的质量。因此,管理者的关键任务是定义他们最想优化的属性,并选择支持该目标的策略。©1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software maintenance management strategies: observations from the field
There is much literature describing software maintenance process models, but few comparative studies on the approaches used by managers in the field. This paper describes three software maintenance management strategies currently implemented by six organizations. The strategies are compared on the attributes of performance, economics, efficiency and end-product quality. The paper defines operational measurements for each attribute and describes the data collected over the past two years. The three strategies investigated were labelled the fixed staff/variable schedule, variable staff/fixed schedule and the variable staff/variable schedule. Each strategy has attributes that make it appealing for implementation by a software maintenance project manager. The fixed staff/variable schedule strategy had the fastest priority change response time, the variable staff/fixed schedule strategy had the highest throughput and the best on-schedule performance, and the variable staff/variable schedule had the lowest cost and highest quality. Thus, the key task for a manager is defining the attribute that they would most like to optimize and choosing a strategy that supports that goal. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信