捐赠基金是否应该继续致力于私人投资的实际应用?

Dennis R. Hammond
{"title":"捐赠基金是否应该继续致力于私人投资的实际应用?","authors":"Dennis R. Hammond","doi":"10.3905/pa.9.2.443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Should Endowments Continue to Commit to Private Investments?, from the December 2020 issue of The Journal of Investing, author Dennis Hammond (of Veriti Management in Boston) analyzes whether private equity, venture capital, and private real estate provide superior investment returns for nonprofit endowment funds. Endowments have increasingly allocated assets to private investments, due to their superior historical returns. However, these returns have slowed over the past 10 years–leading the author to question whether private investments are still worth it. Hammond uses publicly available data to calculate whether endowments have earned higher net returns from private or public investments–and whether private investments held by large or average endowments (those with more or less than $1 billion) have done better or worse. He finds that large endowments’ private investments have outperformed those of average endowments and have outperformed the S&P 500 stock index, while average-size endowments’ private investments have underperformed the S&P 500. He says this difference stems from the fact that only large endowments can afford to hire the best private investment managers. He says average-size endowments therefore should consider reallocating assets to publicly traded investments–and offers reasons why large endowments might do the same. TOPICS: Private equity, equity portfolio management, foundations & endowments, volatility measures, fundamental equity analysis, real estate, manager selection","PeriodicalId":179835,"journal":{"name":"Practical Application","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Applications of Should Endowments Continue to Commit to Private Investments?\",\"authors\":\"Dennis R. Hammond\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/pa.9.2.443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Should Endowments Continue to Commit to Private Investments?, from the December 2020 issue of The Journal of Investing, author Dennis Hammond (of Veriti Management in Boston) analyzes whether private equity, venture capital, and private real estate provide superior investment returns for nonprofit endowment funds. Endowments have increasingly allocated assets to private investments, due to their superior historical returns. However, these returns have slowed over the past 10 years–leading the author to question whether private investments are still worth it. Hammond uses publicly available data to calculate whether endowments have earned higher net returns from private or public investments–and whether private investments held by large or average endowments (those with more or less than $1 billion) have done better or worse. He finds that large endowments’ private investments have outperformed those of average endowments and have outperformed the S&P 500 stock index, while average-size endowments’ private investments have underperformed the S&P 500. He says this difference stems from the fact that only large endowments can afford to hire the best private investment managers. He says average-size endowments therefore should consider reallocating assets to publicly traded investments–and offers reasons why large endowments might do the same. TOPICS: Private equity, equity portfolio management, foundations & endowments, volatility measures, fundamental equity analysis, real estate, manager selection\",\"PeriodicalId\":179835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Application\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/pa.9.2.443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/pa.9.2.443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《捐赠基金应该继续致力于私人投资吗?》在《投资杂志》2020年12月刊上,作者丹尼斯·哈蒙德(来自波士顿Veriti Management)分析了私募股权、风险资本和私人房地产是否能为非营利捐赠基金提供卓越的投资回报。捐赠基金越来越多地将资产分配给私人投资,因为它们的历史回报更高。然而,这些回报在过去10年里有所放缓——这让作者质疑私人投资是否仍然值得。哈蒙德使用公开数据来计算捐赠基金从私人或公共投资中获得的净回报是否更高,以及大型捐赠基金或一般捐赠基金(超过或少于10亿美元的捐赠基金)持有的私人投资是做得更好还是更差。他发现,大型捐赠基金的私人投资表现优于一般捐赠基金,并优于标准普尔500指数,而中等规模捐赠基金的私人投资表现低于标准普尔500指数。他说,这种差异源于这样一个事实,即只有大型捐赠基金才有能力聘请最好的私人投资经理。他说,中等规模的捐赠基金因此应该考虑将资产重新配置到公开交易的投资中,并给出了大型捐赠基金可能也会这么做的理由。主题:私募股权,股票投资组合管理,基金会和捐赠基金,波动率措施,基本股票分析,房地产,经理选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical Applications of Should Endowments Continue to Commit to Private Investments?
In Should Endowments Continue to Commit to Private Investments?, from the December 2020 issue of The Journal of Investing, author Dennis Hammond (of Veriti Management in Boston) analyzes whether private equity, venture capital, and private real estate provide superior investment returns for nonprofit endowment funds. Endowments have increasingly allocated assets to private investments, due to their superior historical returns. However, these returns have slowed over the past 10 years–leading the author to question whether private investments are still worth it. Hammond uses publicly available data to calculate whether endowments have earned higher net returns from private or public investments–and whether private investments held by large or average endowments (those with more or less than $1 billion) have done better or worse. He finds that large endowments’ private investments have outperformed those of average endowments and have outperformed the S&P 500 stock index, while average-size endowments’ private investments have underperformed the S&P 500. He says this difference stems from the fact that only large endowments can afford to hire the best private investment managers. He says average-size endowments therefore should consider reallocating assets to publicly traded investments–and offers reasons why large endowments might do the same. TOPICS: Private equity, equity portfolio management, foundations & endowments, volatility measures, fundamental equity analysis, real estate, manager selection
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信