儿童唾液药物排泄:治疗药物监测的理论和实践问题。

R Gorodischer, G Koren
{"title":"儿童唾液药物排泄:治疗药物监测的理论和实践问题。","authors":"R Gorodischer,&nbsp;G Koren","doi":"10.1159/000457481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies suggest that saliva could be used instead of blood in the therapeutic monitoring of many drugs. This has distinct advantages in pediatrics and neonatology as saliva sampling is painless and spares blood. Stimulation of saliva secretion with a chemical stimulus (i.e. citric acid applied over the tongue) facilitates the study of younger patients. Secretory and reabsorptive processes which take place in the ductal system of the salivary glands, and the rate of flow of the secretion play major roles in the determination of the concentration of solutes in saliva. Drug passage into saliva follows the general principles of movement of drugs across biologic membranes. Only the unbound fraction of the drug in plasma is available for diffusion into saliva and a relationship exists between saliva pH and the saliva/plasma concentration ratio of many polar drugs (tolbutamide, propranolol, procainamide, etc.). However, deviations from the pH theory exist and the inter -and intra-individual variations in saliva/plasma concentration ratios of salicylate and procainamide cannot be explained solely on the basis of fluctuations of salivary pH; on the other hand, a useful relationship exists between plasma and saliva phenobarbital concentrations with no need to correct for saliva pH. The use of stimulated saliva has several advantages over resting saliva: a larger volume of the sample is obtained, the pH gradient between plasma and saliva is smaller, the variability in saliva/plasma concentration ratios of some drugs is narrowed, and less specimens are too viscous or discolored to allow drug analysis. Thorough rinsing of the mouth is required prior to saliva sampling as remnants of orally administered medicines may contaminate saliva specimens and give spuriously high values. Deviation from a simple but strict methodology accounts for some of the discrepancies found in the literature. Studies in children uniformly recommend saliva for therapeutic monitoring of phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital. Saliva sampling for therapeutic monitoring of ethosuximide, primidone and digoxin in infants and children, and of theophylline and caffeine in the neonate is promising, but little pediatric experience is available as yet. The value of saliva in therapeutic monitoring of theophylline in children is still controversial. Little of highly polar compounds such as aminoglycosides, and of polar highly protein bound drugs such as valproic acid is present in saliva. More data are still needed on the excretion of drugs in saliva in infants and in acutely ill children, and few data exist in the premature and full-term neonate.</p>","PeriodicalId":11160,"journal":{"name":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457481","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary excretion of drugs in children: theoretical and practical issues in therapeutic drug monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"R Gorodischer,&nbsp;G Koren\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000457481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies suggest that saliva could be used instead of blood in the therapeutic monitoring of many drugs. This has distinct advantages in pediatrics and neonatology as saliva sampling is painless and spares blood. Stimulation of saliva secretion with a chemical stimulus (i.e. citric acid applied over the tongue) facilitates the study of younger patients. Secretory and reabsorptive processes which take place in the ductal system of the salivary glands, and the rate of flow of the secretion play major roles in the determination of the concentration of solutes in saliva. Drug passage into saliva follows the general principles of movement of drugs across biologic membranes. Only the unbound fraction of the drug in plasma is available for diffusion into saliva and a relationship exists between saliva pH and the saliva/plasma concentration ratio of many polar drugs (tolbutamide, propranolol, procainamide, etc.). However, deviations from the pH theory exist and the inter -and intra-individual variations in saliva/plasma concentration ratios of salicylate and procainamide cannot be explained solely on the basis of fluctuations of salivary pH; on the other hand, a useful relationship exists between plasma and saliva phenobarbital concentrations with no need to correct for saliva pH. The use of stimulated saliva has several advantages over resting saliva: a larger volume of the sample is obtained, the pH gradient between plasma and saliva is smaller, the variability in saliva/plasma concentration ratios of some drugs is narrowed, and less specimens are too viscous or discolored to allow drug analysis. Thorough rinsing of the mouth is required prior to saliva sampling as remnants of orally administered medicines may contaminate saliva specimens and give spuriously high values. Deviation from a simple but strict methodology accounts for some of the discrepancies found in the literature. Studies in children uniformly recommend saliva for therapeutic monitoring of phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital. Saliva sampling for therapeutic monitoring of ethosuximide, primidone and digoxin in infants and children, and of theophylline and caffeine in the neonate is promising, but little pediatric experience is available as yet. The value of saliva in therapeutic monitoring of theophylline in children is still controversial. Little of highly polar compounds such as aminoglycosides, and of polar highly protein bound drugs such as valproic acid is present in saliva. More data are still needed on the excretion of drugs in saliva in infants and in acutely ill children, and few data exist in the premature and full-term neonate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457481\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

研究表明,唾液可以代替血液用于许多药物的治疗监测。这在儿科和新生儿中具有明显的优势,因为唾液取样无痛且不需要血液。用化学刺激刺激唾液分泌(如柠檬酸涂在舌头上)有助于年轻患者的研究。唾液腺导管系统的分泌和重吸收过程以及分泌物的流动速度在决定唾液中溶质的浓度中起主要作用。药物进入唾液遵循药物穿过生物膜运动的一般原则。血浆中只有药物的未结合部分可扩散到唾液中,唾液pH值与许多极性药物(甲苯丁胺、心得安、普鲁卡因胺等)的唾液/血浆浓度比存在关系。然而,存在与pH理论的偏差,唾液/血浆中水杨酸盐和普鲁卡因胺浓度比的个体间和个体内变化不能仅仅根据唾液pH的波动来解释;另一方面,血浆和唾液苯巴比妥浓度之间存在有用的关系,无需校正唾液pH。与静息唾液相比,使用刺激唾液有几个优点:获得的样品体积更大,血浆和唾液之间的pH梯度更小,唾液/血浆中某些药物浓度比的变异性缩小,并且较少的样品过于粘稠或变色而无法进行药物分析。在唾液取样之前,需要彻底冲洗口腔,因为口服药物的残留物可能会污染唾液样本并给出虚假的高值。偏离简单但严格的方法论解释了文献中发现的一些差异。对儿童的研究一致推荐唾液用于苯妥英、卡马西平和苯巴比妥的治疗性监测。唾液取样用于监测婴儿和儿童中乙氧亚胺、primidone和地高辛的治疗性,以及新生儿中茶碱和咖啡因的治疗性,是有希望的,但目前儿科的经验还很少。唾液在儿童茶碱治疗监测中的价值仍然存在争议。唾液中几乎没有氨基糖苷等高极性化合物和丙戊酸等高极性蛋白结合药物。关于婴儿和急病儿童唾液中药物排泄的数据还需要更多的数据,关于早产儿和足月新生儿的数据很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salivary excretion of drugs in children: theoretical and practical issues in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Studies suggest that saliva could be used instead of blood in the therapeutic monitoring of many drugs. This has distinct advantages in pediatrics and neonatology as saliva sampling is painless and spares blood. Stimulation of saliva secretion with a chemical stimulus (i.e. citric acid applied over the tongue) facilitates the study of younger patients. Secretory and reabsorptive processes which take place in the ductal system of the salivary glands, and the rate of flow of the secretion play major roles in the determination of the concentration of solutes in saliva. Drug passage into saliva follows the general principles of movement of drugs across biologic membranes. Only the unbound fraction of the drug in plasma is available for diffusion into saliva and a relationship exists between saliva pH and the saliva/plasma concentration ratio of many polar drugs (tolbutamide, propranolol, procainamide, etc.). However, deviations from the pH theory exist and the inter -and intra-individual variations in saliva/plasma concentration ratios of salicylate and procainamide cannot be explained solely on the basis of fluctuations of salivary pH; on the other hand, a useful relationship exists between plasma and saliva phenobarbital concentrations with no need to correct for saliva pH. The use of stimulated saliva has several advantages over resting saliva: a larger volume of the sample is obtained, the pH gradient between plasma and saliva is smaller, the variability in saliva/plasma concentration ratios of some drugs is narrowed, and less specimens are too viscous or discolored to allow drug analysis. Thorough rinsing of the mouth is required prior to saliva sampling as remnants of orally administered medicines may contaminate saliva specimens and give spuriously high values. Deviation from a simple but strict methodology accounts for some of the discrepancies found in the literature. Studies in children uniformly recommend saliva for therapeutic monitoring of phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital. Saliva sampling for therapeutic monitoring of ethosuximide, primidone and digoxin in infants and children, and of theophylline and caffeine in the neonate is promising, but little pediatric experience is available as yet. The value of saliva in therapeutic monitoring of theophylline in children is still controversial. Little of highly polar compounds such as aminoglycosides, and of polar highly protein bound drugs such as valproic acid is present in saliva. More data are still needed on the excretion of drugs in saliva in infants and in acutely ill children, and few data exist in the premature and full-term neonate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信